FAPI PET uptake patterns after invasive medical interventions: a single center retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: Fibroblast activation protein (FAP)-inhibitor (FAPI)-PET tracers allow imaging of the FAP-expressing cancer associated fibroblasts (CAF) and also the normal activated fibroblasts (NAF) involved in inflammation/fibrosis that may be present after invasive medical interventions. We evaluated [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 uptake patterns post-medical/invasive non-systemic interventions. METHODS: This single-center retrospective analysis was conducted in 79 consecutive patients who underwent [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT. Investigators reviewed prior patient medical/invasive interventions (surgery, endoscopy, biopsy, radiotherapy, foreign body placement (FBP) defined as implanted medical/surgical material present at time of scan) and characterized the anatomically corresponding FAPI uptake intensity both visually (positive if above surrounding background) and quantitatively (SUVmax). Interventions with missing data/images or confounders of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 uptake (partial volume effect, other cause of increased uptake) were excluded. Available correlative FDG, DOTATATE and PSMA PET/CTs were analyzed when available. RESULTS: 163 medical/invasive interventions (mostly surgeries (49%), endoscopies (18%) and non-surgical biopsies (10%)) in 60 subjects were included for analysis. 43/163 (26%) involved FBP. FAPI uptake occurred in 24/163 (15%) of interventions (average SUVmax 3.2 (mild), range 1.5-5.1). The median time-interval post-intervention to FAPI-PET was 47.5 months and was shorter when FAPI uptake was present (median 9.5 months) than when absent (median 60.1 months; p = 0.001). Cut-off time beyond which no FAPI uptake would be present post-intervention without FBP was 8.2 months, with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 82, 90, 99 and 31% respectively. No optimal cutoff point could be determined when considering interventions with FBP. No significant difference was detected between frequency of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 and [18F]FDG uptake in intervention sites. Compared to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 revealed more frequent and intense post-interventional tracer uptake. CONCLUSION: [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 uptake from medical/invasive interventions without FBP appears to be time dependent, nearly always absent beyond 8 months post-intervention, but frequently present for years with FBP.

Characterizing Normal Variant [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 Uptake in the Epididymis.

The biodistribution of fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET tracers includes the kidneys, bladder, uterus, breast, muscles, and bone marrow. We describe its occasional uptake patterns in the epididymis. Methods: Epididymal [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 uptake was retrospectively analyzed in 55 PET/CT studies of 55 men. Uptake intensity (SUV), pattern (diffuse, focal, or multifocal), laterality, and location (epididymal head with or without body/tail) were analyzed. Electronic medical records were reviewed to determine the presence of epididymis-related disease. Results: Epididymal [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 uptake was observed in 8 of 55 (15%) subjects, with bilateral epididymal head uptake in all cases and epididymal body/tail uptake in 6 of 8 (75%) cases, 5 of 6 (83%) bilaterally and 1 of 6 (17%) unilaterally. The average SUVmax was greater in the epididymal heads than in the epididymal bodies/tails, with an SUVmax of 4.1 versus 3.0 (P < 0.001). No subject had epididymal disease related to the uptake. Conclusion: [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 uptake in the epididymis occurs occasionally and does not appear related to epididymal disease.

Comparing digital to analog prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted piflufolastat 18 F PET/CT in prostate cancer patients in early biochemical failure.

PURPOSE: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computer tomography (PET/CT) in prostate cancer patients with biochemical failure(BCF) showslimited sensitivity when the prostate-specific antigen(PSA) <0.5 ng/mL. The development of digital PET/CT has greatly improved smaller lesion detection. This study's goal was to compare the performance and clinical value of PSMA-targeted piflufolastat PET/CT for prostate cancer BCF with digital versus analog PET/CT. METHODS: In this retrospective study, all piflufolastat PET/CT scans in subjects with PSA ≤ 3.0 ng/mL who were referred for prostate cancer BCF were included. The performance characteristics of 171 analog PET/CT studies in 155 subjects from May 2017 to January 2020 and 106 digital PET/CT studies in 103 subjects from February 2020 to December 2020 were compared. Lesions were considered malignant if they did not match the known physiological distribution of piflufolastat and did not represent uptake in benign lesions. PSMA PET/CT studies were considered positive if at least one malignant lesion was detected and negative if none were detected. RESULTS: Digital piflufolastat PET/CT outperformed analog piflufolastat PET/CT in subjects with PSA < 0.5 ng/mL with a positivity rate of 69% versus 37%, respectively. In patients with PSA ≥ 0.5 ng/mL, both technologies performed similarly. There was no statistically significant difference between the number or size of piflufolastat-avid lesions detected per PET/CT study. CONCLUSION: In prostate cancer patients with BCF and PSA < 0.5 ng/mL, digital piflufolastat PET/CT has a higher detection rate of malignant lesions than analog piflufolastat PET/CT.

Physiologic prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted 18F-DCFPyL uptake in the epididymis head newly appreciated on digital PET/CT.

PURPOSE: The published physiological distribution of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET ligands includes normal uptake in the lacrimal glands, salivary glands, bowel, liver, spleen, kidneys and parasympathetic ganglia but does not include the epididymis. METHODS: Retrospective review of 134 PSMA-targeted 2-(3-(1-carboxy-5-[(6-[18F]fluoropyridine-3-carbonyl)-amino]-pentyl)-ureido)-pentanedioic acid (18F-DCFPyL) PET/CT scans performed on a latest generation digital scanner for radiotracer uptake in the epididymal head region was correlated with multiple clinical and laboratory factors. RESULTS: Physiologic PSMA radiotracer uptake in the epididymal head region was present in 57% of all subjects, including 29% in those with a total serum testosterone ≤ 5 nmol/L and 65% of patients with serum testosterone > 5 nmol/L, odds ratio of 0.21 (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Epididymal head uptake is physiologic and very common on digital PSMA PET/CT and is more frequent in patients with higher serum testosterone levels. The enhanced small structure detection of digital PET/CT is the most likely explanation for the novel visualization of this normal variant.

Weight loss as primary indication for FDG-PET/CT.

PURPOSE: Some consider fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) clinically useful in patients presenting with nonspecific symptoms of malignancy, weight loss most commonly encountered. However, the appropriateness of such FDG-PET/CT studies remains to be clarified. This study evaluated the clinical value of FDG-PET/CT in patients referred primarily for weight loss. METHODS: From 2010 to 2017 in one academic center, 252 subjects underwent 254 FDG-PET/CT studies for weight loss as primary indication and retrospectively studied. Eighteen subjects were excluded due to ongoing active malignancy, weight loss not ultimately being the main indication for the FDG-PET/CT, technically inadequate FDG-PET/CT and insufficient follow-up. The FDG-PET/CT scans were considered clinically beneficial when true positive for the cause of weight loss that other investigations missed or would have missed, clinically neutral when true negative and clinically detrimental when false positive leading to additional investigations or false negative. RESULTS: Ultimately 234 unique subjects (236 FDG-PET/CT studies) were included. The average subject weight loss prior to the PET was 12 kg and average follow-up time post FDG-PET/CT scan was 3.4 years. The FDG-PET/CT scans were true positive in 24 studies (10%) with 8 studies (3%) clinically beneficial; false positive in 38 studies (16%) of which 26 led to 35 additional procedures and false negative in 13 studies (6%). In total, 39 (17%) FDG-PET/CT studies were clinically detrimental. The other 149 (63%) studies were true negative, clinically neutral. CONCLUSION: FDG-PET/CT appears to have limited value in assessing subjects with weight loss as the leading clinical indication, proving to be five times more often detrimental than beneficial.