RESUMO
Background: Craniopharyngiomas (CPs) are rare, low-grade tumors characterized by a range of debilitating symptoms. Most of the existing literature reports postoperative outcomes of the different treatment modalities of childhood CP. However, few studies have reported the impact of these different treatment methods on the quality of life (QoL) of survivors of childhood CP. Therefore, we aim to assess the correlation between different surgical modalities on the QoL of patients with childhood CP from a lower-middle-income country. Methods: Twenty-nine survivors who underwent treatment for CP were included in the study. The selected patients had either been managed with complete resection, debulking, or placement of an Ommaya reservoir. QoL was assessed by the pediatric quality of life (PedsQL) questionnaire. The effect of the different treatment modalities on the QoL was assessed. Results: Mean follow-up was 4.4 ± 2.19 years. The type of surgery was significantly related to the mean PedsQL scores for the total score as well as each of the individual domain scores (P < 0.001). Complete resection of the tumor resulted in the lowest mean (standard deviation) PedsQL total score of 56.6 ± 7.12 compared to the Ommaya reservoir with biopsy (83.3 ± 5.69) and debulking (93.8 ± 3.37) (P < 0.001). Conclusion: There was a significant effect of the type of surgical treatment on the QoL of the survivors of childhood CP. It is important to consider the long-term outcomes in addition to immediate postoperative outcomes when deciding on a treatment strategy while managing children with CP.
RESUMO
Background: Low-field magnetic resonance imaging (LF-MRI) has become a valuable tool in the diagnosis of brain tumors due to its high spatial resolution and ability to acquire images in a short amount of time. However, the use of LF-MRI for intraoperative imaging during brain tumor surgeries has not been extensively studied. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the impact of low-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (LF-IMRI) on the duration of brain tumor surgery and the extent of tumor resection. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar from February 2000 to December 2022. The studies were selected based on the inclusion criteria and reviewed independently by two reviewers. The gathered information was organized and analyzed using Excel. Results: Our review of 21 articles found that low-field intraoperative MRI (LF-IMRI) with a field below 0.3T was used in most of the studies, specifically 15 studies used 0.15T LF-IMRI. The T1-weighted sequence was the most frequently reported, and the average scanning time was 24.26 min. The majority of the studies reported a positive impact of LF-IMRI on the extent of tumor resection, with an increase ranging from 11% to 52.5%. Notably, there were no studies describing the use of ultra-low-field (ULF) intraoperative MRI. Conclusion: The results of this systematic review will aid neurosurgeons and neuroradiologists in making informed decisions about the use of LF-MRI in brain tumor surgeries. Further, research is needed to fully understand the impact of LF-MRI in brain tumor surgeries and to optimize its use in the clinical setting. There is an opportunity to study the utility of ULF-MRI in brain tumor surgeries.
