RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The predictive value of the risk stratification scales in elderly patients with IPAH might differ from that in younger patients. It is unknown whether young and older IPAH patients have the same survival dependence on PAH-specific therapy numbers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic relevance of risk stratification scales and PAH medication numbers in elderly IPAH patients in comparison with young IPAH patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 119 patients from a prospective single-center PAH registry were divided into group I < 60 years old (n = 89) and group II ≥ 60 years old (n = 30). ESC/ERS, REVEAL, and REVEAL 2.0 risk stratification scores were assessed at baseline, as well as H2FpEF score and survival at follow-up. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up period of 2.9 years (1.63; 6.0), 42 (35.3%) patients died; at 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10 years, survival was 95%, 88.6%, 78.5%, 61.7%, 48.5%, and 33.7%, respectively. No survival differences were observed between the two groups, despite the use of monotherapy in the elderly patients. The best predictive REVEAL value in elderly patients (IPAH patients ≥ 60 years) was AUC 0.73 (0.56-0.91), p = 0.03; and in patients with LHD comorbidities in the entire cohort, it was AUC 0.73 (0.59-0.87), p < 0.009. Factors independently associated with death in the entire cohort were CKD (p = 0.01, HR 0.2), the right-to-left ventricle dimension ratio (p = 0.0047, HR 5.97), and NT-proBNP > 1400 pg/mL (p = 0.008, HR 3.18). CONCLUSION: Risk stratification in the elderly IPAH patients requires a fundamentally different approach than that of younger patients, taking into account the initial limitations in physical performance and comorbidities that interfere with current assessment scores. The REVEAL score reliably stratifies patients at any age and LHD comorbidities. The initial monotherapy seems to be reasonable in patients over 60 years. Selection tools for initial combination PAH therapy in older IPAH patients with comorbidities need to be validated in prospective observational studies.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recently, transcatheter pulmonary artery (PA) ablation aiming at sympathetic denervation has been proposed in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). This pilot feasibility study aimed to assess the feasibility of selective radiofrequency PA ablation based on response to high-frequency stimulation mapping. METHODS: The study comprised 3 female patients with idiopathic PAH (IPAH). The following reactions to PA stimulation were noted and marked by color points on the three-dimensional map: sinus bradycardia (heart rate decrease ≥15%), tachycardia (heart rate increase ≥15%), phrenic nerve capture, and cough. Since the most appropriate ablation strategy was unknown, two approaches were suggested, according to stimulation results: ablation at points with any heart rate response (either bradycardia or tachycardia)-this approach was applied in patient #1 (IPAH long-term responder to calcium channel blockers); segmental ablation at points with no response and with tachycardia response (one IPAH long-term responder to calcium channel blockers patient and one-IPAH with negative vasoreactive testing). Hemodynamic measurements were performed before and after denervation. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: Six-months follow-up was uneventful for patients #1 and 3; patient #2 had one syncope and reduced 6-minute walk test distance and peak VO2 consumption. At 12 months, there was a normalization of mean PA pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) in patient #1. Patient #2 had no change in PA pressure and PVR at 12 months. Patient #3 remained in II functional class; however, there was an increase in mean PA pressure and loss of vasoreactivity. CONCLUSIONS: Electrical high-frequency stimulation of the PA identifies several types of evoked reactions: heart rate slowing, acceleration, phrenic nerve capture, and cough. The improvement in clinical and hemodynamic parameters following targeted PA ablation in the IPAH patient with positive vasoreactive testing should be confirmed in larger studies.
