Exosomal tumor microRNA modulates premetastatic organ cells.

Tumor exosomes educate selected host tissues toward a prometastatic phenotype. We demonstrated this for exosomes of the metastatic rat adenocarcinoma BSp73ASML (ASML), which modulate draining lymph nodes and lung tissue to support settlement of poorly metastatic BSp73ASML-CD44v4-v7 knockdown (ASML-CD44v(kd)) cells. Now, we profiled mRNA and microRNA (miRNA) of ASML(wt) and ASML-CD44v(kd) exosomes to define the pathway(s), whereby exosomes prepare the premetastatic niche. ASML exosomes, recovered in draining lymph nodes after subcutaneous injection, preferentially are taken up by lymph node stroma cells (LnStr) and lung fibroblasts (LuFb) that were chosen as exosome targets. ASML(wt) and ASML-CD44v(kd) exosomes contain a restricted mRNA and miRNA repertoire that differs significantly between the two lines and exosomes thereof due to CD44v6 influencing gene and miRNA transcription/posttranscriptional regulation. Exosomal mRNA and miRNA are recovered in target cells, where transferred miRNA significantly affected mRNA translation. Besides others, this was exemplified for abundant ASML(wt)-exosomal miR-494 and miR-542-3p, which target cadherin-17 (cdh17). Concomitantly, matrix metalloproteinase transcription, accompanying cdh17 down-regulation, was upregulated in LnStr transfected with miR-494 or miR-542-3p or co-cultured with tumor exosomes. Thus, tumor exosomes target non-transformed cells in premetastatic organs and modulate premetastatic organ cells predominantly through transferred miRNA, where miRNA from a metastasizing tumor prepares premetastatic organ stroma cells for tumor cell hosting. Fitting the demands of metastasizing tumor cells, transferred exosomal miRNA mostly affected proteases, adhesion molecules, chemokine ligands, cell cycle- and angiogenesis-promoting genes, and genes engaged in oxidative stress response. The demonstration of function-competent exosomal miRNA in host target cells encourages exploiting exosomes as a therapeutic gene delivery system.

Interleukin-6 trans-signalling differentially regulates proliferation, migration, adhesion and maspin expression in human prostate cancer cells.

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is suggested to have a pathogenic role in the progression of prostate cancer (PC), therefore representing an attractive target for new therapies. However, due to the pleiotropy of this cytokine, targeting IL-6 results in different and unpredictable responses. In order to better understand the mechanisms underlying the different responses to the cytokine, we focused our attention on IL-6 receptors (IL-6Rs) that represent the first element in the cascade of cytokine-activated signalling pathways. IL-6 signal transduction may indeed occur through the membrane IL-6R (classical signalling) and/or through the less studied soluble IL-6R (sIL-6R; IL-6 trans-signalling (IL-6TS)). We provide the first evidence how responses to IL-6 may depend on the different content of IL-6Rs in PC. In particular, the studies of (3)H-thymidine incorporation and exploitation of different approaches (i.e. activation or inhibition of IL-6TS in sIL-6R-negative and -positive cell lines and transfection of IL-6R siRNA) allowed us to demonstrate that IL-6TS specifically accounts for an anti-proliferative effect of the cytokine in three PC cell lines that are known to respond differently to IL-6. Additionally, by applying migration-, scratch- and adhesion assays, we show that IL-6TS increases motility and migration and decreases adhesion of prostate cells facilitating thereby processes that determine metastasis initiation and spread. Finally, by western analyses, we uncovered an IL-6- and sIL-6R-dependent downregulation of the tumour suppressor maspin. Collectively, these data suggest that selective targeting of IL-6TS might allow to refine the currently available experimental anti-IL-6 therapies against PC.

Identification of mu-crystallin as an androgen-regulated gene in human prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Androgen receptor (AR) signaling is implicated in prostate cancer progression. Therefore, identification of AR downstream genes is potentially important for selection of novel markers and therapy targets in prostate cancer. METHODS: Expression of a thyroid hormone T3-binding protein mu-crystallin (CRYM) mRNA and protein in cell lines was evaluated by real-time PCR and Western blot, respectively. CRYM expression in vivo was analyzed in patients' samples by immunohistochemistry. The effects of androgen and T3 on proliferation of MDA PCa 2b cells were assessed by (3)H-thymidine uptake assay. RESULTS: CRYM expression was detected in AR-positive LNCaP and MDA PCa 2b cells. In MDA PCA 2b cells, CRYM was regulated by androgens. Androgen-induced CRYM expression was diminished by antiandrogens or AR siRNA. Inhibition of transcription by alpha-amanitin caused a reduction in CRYM mRNA. The lack of CRYM expression was noted in LAPC-4 cells and in AR-negative prostate cancer cell lines PC-3 and DU-145. CRYM protein was increased in cancer tissue and decreased in samples from patients after hormonal therapy. In samples from patients with therapy-refractory cancer CRYM was not detectable. We also found that androgens and T3 have additive effects on stimulation of MDA PCa 2b cells proliferation. CONCLUSION: CRYM is a novel androgen-regulated gene whose expression is elevated in prostate cancer but down-regulated in castration therapy-resistant tumors.

Interleukin-6 stimulation of growth of prostate cancer in vitro and in vivo through activation of the androgen receptor.

It is hypothesized that ligand-independent activation of the androgen receptor is one of the mechanisms implicated in tumour progression. However, supportive evidence is limited to the effect of HER-2/neu that stimulates prostate cancer progression through activation of the androgen receptor. In the present study, we have asked whether the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6), which is known to stimulate androgen receptor activity and expression of its downstream target genes, may also induce growth of androgen-sensitive cells. We have found that IL-6 differentially regulates proliferation of LAPC-4 and MDA PCa 2b cells. In MDA PCa 2b cells, growth stimulation by IL-6 was reversed by administration of either the non-steroidal anti-androgen bicalutamide or the inhibitor of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway PD98059. Neither cell line was found to express endogenous IL-6. Interestingly, the treatment of those prostate cancer cells did not increase phosphorylation of STAT3. The effect of IL-6 on stimulation of androgen receptor activity in MDA PCa 2b cells was lower than that of androgen, comparable with findings reported by other researchers. However, growth of MDA PCa 2b xenografts in castrated animals treated with IL-6 was similar to that in non-castrated animals. In addition, bicalutamide showed an inhibitory effect on IL-6-regulated growth in vivo. Taken together, data in the present study demonstrate that IL-6 may cause growth of androgen receptor-positive tumours in vitro and in vivo through activation of the androgen receptor.

The androgen receptor pathway is by-passed in prostate cancer cells generated after prolonged treatment with bicalutamide.

BACKGROUND: Experimental work in various prostate cancer models revealed that the androgen receptor is frequently upregulated and implicated in tumor progression. However, little attention has been paid to the androgen receptor-signaling pathway in the development of therapy resistance in patients who receive chronic treatment with a non-steroidal anti-androgen. METHODS: We have generated a novel subline, LNCaP-Bic, after prolonged treatment with androgen and bicalutamide in vitro. Proliferation of LNCaP-Bic cells in the absence or presence of androgen, tocopherol succinate, and/or bicalutamide was assessed by cell counting. Androgen receptor expression was determined by Western blot. Luciferase activity was measured in cells transfected with an androgen-responsive reporter. RESULTS: In basal conditions, proliferation of LNCaP-Bic cells increased more than threefold over that of control LNCaP cells. Neither synthetic androgen R1881 nor bicalutamide showed any effect on LNCaP-Bic growth in vitro. Androgen receptor expression did not differ between the cell subline generated in the presence of bicalutamide and parental LNCaP cells. The ability of R1881 to induce reporter gene activity in LNCaP-Bic cells was reduced by 56%. Tocopherol succinate caused inhibition of proliferation only in the parental cell line although the androgen receptor and prostate-specific antigen were down regulated by the vitamin E derivative in both parental LNCaP and LNCaP-Bic cells. CONCLUSIONS: Androgen receptor-mediated signal transaction is not enhanced in cells selected in the presence of bicalutamide. Our data may suggest that a more differentiated approach in targeting the androgen receptor is needed in prostate cancers that become resistant to classic endocrine treatment.