RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Minor surgical procedures under general anaesthesia require a patent airway without the use of muscle relaxant. Supraglottic airway devices have been widely used for airway management. A study was undertaken to compare first-time insertion success rate, insertion time, sealing pressure and complications between the Baska® mask and I-gel. METHODS: After approval from the institutional ethical committee, a randomised single-blinded study was conducted on 50 American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status I and II female patients aged 18-40 years who underwent minor surgical procedures under general anaesthesia. Patients were randomly categorized into two groups of 25 each; group Baska® mask and group I-gel, and the first-time success rate, mean insertion time and sealing pressure were measured. The results were analysed using unpaired t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square test and ANOVA. A p value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: The first-time insertion success rate of the Baska® mask was 21/24 (88%) when compared with the I-gel, which was 23/25 (92%) (p=0.585). The insertion time of the Baska® mask was 14.9±6.2 s, whereas that of the I-gel was 14.7±4.4 s (p=0.877). The mean sealing pressure of the Baska® mask was significantly higher when compared with the I-gel (28.9±3.5 vs. 25.9±2.5 cmH2O) (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: The Baska® mask had a similar first-time insertion success rate and insertion time as the I-gel. The sealing pressure of the Baska® mask was significantly greater than that of the I-gel. Both devices had complications that were comparable.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Epidural administrations of α2 agonists are being used as adjuvants as they lead to anxiolysis, sedation, analgesia, and hypnosis. AIM: This study aims to evaluate the analgesic effects of epidural α2 agonists-dexmedetomidine and clonidine in conjunction with intrathecal levobupivacaine in combined spinal epidural anesthesia (CSEA). METHODS: A prospective, randomized controlled study was done to assess and compare the efficacy and clinical profile of two α2 adrenergic agonists, clonidine, and dexmedetomidine administered epidurally in combination with intrathecal levobupivacaine in CSEA. The study was conducted for 1 year. Sixty adult patients physical status Class I and II undergoing below umbilical surgeries under CSEA were included in the study after a valid consent. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups, to receive either epidural dexmedetomidine (1.5 µg/kg) or clonidine (2 µg/kg) in 10 ml normal saline along with 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine 15 mg (3 ml). Block characteristics, ability to provide sedation, duration, and quality of analgesia and side effects were studied and compared between the groups. RESULTS: The characteristics of intraoperative block were comparable among two groups. As compared to clonidine, dexmedetomidine provided a better sedation and prolonged analgesia, evidenced by the distribution of visual analog scale scores and requirement rescue analgesic among two groups. The side effect profile of the two drugs was comparable. CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine at 1.5 µg/kg epidurally with intrathecal levobupivacaine is a better adjuvant compared to clonidine at 2 µg/kg epidurally in CSEA because of better sedation, prolonged analgesia, and safe side-effect profile.