Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Clin Biochem ; 55(1): 100-106, 2018 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28068806

RESUMO

Introduction The ASSIST-CKD project is a national quality improvement programme, aiming to decrease the number of patients presenting late to renal services by enabling laboratories to review up to five years of estimated glomerular filtration rate results graphically and report deteriorating patients to their general practitioner. Aim To assess the impact of the project on the laboratory, and of patient reporting on general practitioner management and the local renal service. Method Each week two searches were performed (Search A: maximum age 65 years, maximum eGFR 50 ml/min/1.73 m2 and Search B: Age 66-120 years, maximum eGFR 40 ml/min/1.73 m2) on patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate requested by their general practitioner within the previous seven days. Patients showing deterioration in estimated glomerular filtration rate had a printed graph sent to their general practitioner. Feedback on the graphs and their impact on patient management were obtained from the general practitioners via a questionnaire. Results A median of 37 patients/week were listed for review for Search A, with 32% reported; and Search B a median of 227 patients/week listed, 32% reported. General practitioner surgery questionnaires (29) showed the reports were well received. Of general practitioners responding to the questionnaire, 67% had reviewed a patient earlier than intended, 54% had reviewed local guidance, 48% had emailed the renal team and 48% had referred a patient on receipt of a graph; 34% had shown a graph to their patients, of whom 70% found that useful. Conclusion There is some evidence that ASSIST-CKD reporting has enhanced patient care; however, further long-term assessment is still required.


Assuntos
Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Medicina Geral , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Monitorização Fisiológica , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reino Unido
2.
Nephron ; 130(3): 175-81, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26111637

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Publications on acute kidney injury (AKI) have concentrated on the inpatient population. We wanted to determine the extent of AKI in the community, its follow-up and patient impact. METHOD: Primary Care creatinine results for May 2012-April 2013 from Cornwall, United Kingdom, were screened for AKI. RESULTS: Over 12 months, 991 AKI episodes were identified (0.4% of all Primary Care creatinine requests); 51% were AKI1, 29% AKI2 and 10% AKI3. Of these, 51% AKI1s, 72% AKI2s and 77% AKI3s had a repeat creatinine requested within 14 days as per National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines. Admissions (May 2012-July 2013) were identified on 46% AKI1s, 58% AKI2s and 65% AKI3s (p < 0.05). The median time from AKI identification to hospital admission was 33 days for AKI1, 12 days for AKI2 and 1 day for AKI3 (p < 0.05); with a median length of stay of 2, 4 and 7 days, respectively (p < 0.05). The 90-day mortality from AKI identification for the admitted patients was 12% AKI1s, 20% AKI2s and 27% AKI3s (p < 0.05) vs. 11, 21 and 65% (p < 0.05) for those that were not admitted. There was no significant difference in mortality for admitted patients vs. non-admitted patients, except for the AKI3s. CONCLUSION: AKI is associated with increased admission and mortality rates; although a large proportion of patients had repeat creatinine testing within 14 days, there was still a significant number with delayed follow-up. Education within Primary Care is required on how to prevent, identify, follow-up and manage AKI.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Creatinina/sangue , Injúria Renal Aguda/sangue , Injúria Renal Aguda/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Causas de Morte , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Risco , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
3.
Clin Med (Lond) ; 14(1): 22-6, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24532738

RESUMO

Early intervention in the management of acute kidney injury (AKI) has been shown to improve outcomes. To facilitate early review we have introduced real time reporting for AKI. An algorithm using the laboratory computer system was implemented to report AKI for inpatients. Over 6 months there were 1,906 AKI reports in 1,518 patients: 56.3% AKI1, 26.9% AKI2 and 16.8% AKI3. 51.0% were male. Median age was 78 (interquartile range [IQR] 17) years. 62.6% were from general medical wards, 16.9% from surgical wards, 6.9% from orthopaedic wards and 5.3% from specialty wards. 8.3% were from peripheral hospitals. 31% of patients with AKI reports were clinically coded for AKI. 9% (n = 139) showed progression of AKI (mortality 42%). Patients with AKI had a significantly higher length of stay and mortality than those that did not. 4% of patients with AKI received acute renal replacement therapy (RRT). An e-alert system is feasible, allowing early identification of inpatients with AKI.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Injúria Renal Aguda/mortalidade , Algoritmos , Sistemas de Informação em Laboratório Clínico , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Injúria Renal Aguda/classificação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Alarmes Clínicos , Creatinina/sangue , Progressão da Doença , Diagnóstico Precoce , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Terapia de Substituição Renal/estatística & dados numéricos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...