Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Res Cardiol ; 112(9): 1212-1219, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36602598

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Currently, less than 20% of patients at very high-risk achieve ESC/EAS dyslipidemia guideline-recommended LDL-C target levels in Europe. "Jena auf Ziel-JaZ" is a prospective cohort study in which early combination therapy with atorvastatin 80 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg was initiated on admission in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and lipid-lowering therapy was escalated during follow-up with bempedoic acid and PCSK9 inhibitors to achieve recommended LDL-C targets in all patients. Moreover, we evaluated side-effects of lipid-lowering therapy. METHODS: Patients admitted with STEMI at Jena University Hospital were started on atorvastatin 80 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg on admission. Patients were followed for EAS/ESC LDL-C target achievement during follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 85 consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. On discharge, 32.9% achieved LDL-C targets on atorvastatin 80 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg. After 4-6 weeks, 80% of all patients on atorvastatin 80 mg and ezetimibe started at the index event were on ESC/EAS LDL-C targets. In 20%, combined lipid-lowering therapy was escalated with either bempedoic acid or PCSK9 inhibitors. All patients achieved LDL-C levels of or below 55 mg/dL during follow-up on triple lipid-lowering therapy. Combined lipid-lowering therapy was well-tolerated with rare side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Early combination therapy with a high-intensity statin and ezetimibe and escalation of lipid-lowering therapy with either bempedoic acid or PCSK9 inhibitors gets potentially all patients with STEMI on recommended ESC/EAS LDL-C targets without significant side effects.


Assuntos
Anticolesterolemiantes , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST , Humanos , Pró-Proteína Convertase 9/uso terapêutico , Atorvastatina/efeitos adversos , Anticolesterolemiantes/efeitos adversos , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/tratamento farmacológico , LDL-Colesterol , Inibidores de PCSK9 , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/efeitos adversos , Ezetimiba/efeitos adversos
2.
J Vis Exp ; (190)2022 12 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36622019

RESUMO

A patent foramen ovale (PFO) persists in about one-quarter of people and is the source of up to 25% of all ischemic strokes, especially strokes in young adults. PFO can be easily diagnosed by transthoracic contrast and/or transesophageal echocardiography. Interventional closure of the PFO via the femoral vein is a commonly used cardiological procedure since several trials have demonstrated the superiority of PFO closure over standard medical therapy in patients with PFO and who have experienced post ischemic, cardioembolic, or cryptogenic stroke. The current paper and video show the procedure of PFO closure in a step-by-step manner.


Assuntos
Forame Oval Patente , AVC Isquêmico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Adulto Jovem , Humanos , Forame Oval Patente/diagnóstico por imagem , Forame Oval Patente/cirurgia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Herz ; 46(5): 445-451, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34463786

RESUMO

Closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) in patients after cryptogenic/cardioembolic stroke is recommended by current guidelines for patients who are 16-60 years of age with a high-risk PFO (class of recommendation A, level of evidence I). The use of double-disk occlusion devices followed by antiplatelet therapy is recommended. The procedure of interventional PFO closure compared with other interventions in cardiology is rather easy to learn. However, it should be performed carefully to avoid postinterventional complications. The number needed to treat (NNT) to avoid one stroke in 5 years in the RESPECT trial was 42, in the CLOSE trial even lower with 20. In the REDUCE trial, the NNT was 28 at 2 years. This can be reduced by longer follow-up, e.g., at 10 years the NNT is 18. While other conditions such as migraine are currently under investigation with respect to the impact of PFO closure, sufficiently powered trials are lacking so that closure in diseases other than stroke should always be individualized.


Assuntos
Forame Oval Patente , Dispositivo para Oclusão Septal , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Forame Oval Patente/complicações , Forame Oval Patente/diagnóstico , Forame Oval Patente/cirurgia , Humanos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária , Recidiva , Prevenção Secundária , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...