Scleral Buckling for Primary Retinal Detachment: Outcomes of Scleral Tunnels versus Scleral Sutures.

PURPOSE: There are primarily two techniques for affixing the scleral buckle (SB) to the sclera in the repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD): scleral tunnels or scleral sutures. METHODS: This retrospective study examined all patients with primary RRD who were treated with primary SB or SB combined with vitrectomy from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 across six sites. Two cohorts were examined: SB affixed using scleral sutures versus scleral tunnels. Pre- and postoperative variables were evaluated including visual acuity, anatomic success, and postoperative strabismus. RESULTS: The mean preoperative logMAR VA for the belt loop cohort was 1.05 ± 1.06 (Snellen 20/224) and for the scleral suture cohort was 1.03 ± 1.04 (Snellen 20/214, p = 0.846). The respective mean postoperative logMAR VAs were 0.45 ± 0.55 (Snellen 20/56) and 0.46 ± 0.59 (Snellen 20/58, p = 0.574). The single surgery success rate for the tunnel cohort was 87.3% versus 88.6% for the suture cohort (p = 0.601). Three patients (1.0%) in the scleral tunnel cohort developed postoperative strabismus, but only one patient (0.1%) in the suture cohort (p = 0.04, multivariate p = 0.76). All cases of strabismus occurred in eyes that underwent SB combined with PPV (p = 0.02). There were no differences in vision, anatomic success, or strabismus between scleral tunnels versus scleral sutures in eyes that underwent primary SB. CONCLUSION: Scleral tunnels and scleral sutures had similar postoperative outcomes. Combined PPV/SB in eyes with scleral tunnels might be a risk for strabismus post retinal detachment surgery.

Impact of contact versus non-contact wide-angle viewing systems on outcomes of primary retinal detachment repair (PRO study report number 5).

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Vitrectomy to repair retinal detachment is often performed with either non-contact wide-angle viewing systems or wide-angle contact viewing systems. The purpose of this study is to assess whether the viewing system used is associated with any differences in surgical outcomes of vitrectomy for primary non-complex retinal detachment repair. METHODS: This is a multicenter, interventional, retrospective, comparative study. Eyes that underwent non-complex primary retinal detachment repair by either pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) alone or in combination with scleral buckle/PPV in 2015 were evaluated. The viewing system at the time of the retinal detachment repair was identified and preoperative patient characteristics, intraoperative findings and postoperative outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 2256 eyes were included in our analysis. Of those, 1893 surgeries used a non-contact viewing system, while 363 used a contact lens system. There was no statistically significant difference in single surgery anatomic success at 3 months (p=0.72), or final anatomic success (p=0.40). Average postoperative visual acuity for the contact-based cases was logMAR 0.345 (20/44 Snellen equivalent) compared with 0.475 (20/60 Snellen equivalent) for non-contact (p=0.001). After controlling for numerous confounding variables in multivariable analysis, viewing system choice was no longer statistically significant (p=0.097). CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant difference in anatomic success achieved for primary retinal detachment repair when comparing non-contact viewing systems to contact lens systems. Postoperative visual acuity was better in the contact-based group but this was not statistically significant when confounding factors were controlled for.

Surgical Outcomes of Primary RRD With and Without Concurrent Full-Thickness Macular Hole (PRO Study Report No. 7).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Non-causal macular holes (MHs) can occur concurrently with rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs). The visual outcomes and surgical approach for these eyes are variable. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multi-institutional, retrospective review of all primary retinal detachment surgeries from January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2015. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative metrics were recorded. RESULTS: There were 2,242 eyes that had pars plana vitrectomy for primary RRD, 43 (1.9%) of which had a MH at the time of surgery. The mean postoperative logMAR visual acuity (VA) for the MH cohort was 0.87 ± 0.64 (20/148) and for eyes without a MH was 0.47 ± 0.63 (20/59; P < .0001). The single-surgery re-attachment rate for the MH cohort and no MH cohort was 86.1% and 84.9%, respectively (P = 1.0000). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with noncausal MHs and RRD had significantly worse VA than patients without a MH. Preoperative counseling is imperative in patients with both RRD and MH. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2020;51:500-505.].

CHOROIDAL NEVUS TRANSFORMATION INTO MELANOMA PER MILLIMETER INCREMENT IN THICKNESS USING MULTIMODAL IMAGING IN 2355 CASES: The 2019 Wendell L. Hughes Lecture.

PURPOSE: To analyze risk of nevus transformation into melanoma per millimeter increment. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 3,806 choroidal nevi for transformation into melanoma per incremental millimeter thickness (flat [≤1.0 mm], thin [1.1-2.0 mm], thicker [2.1-3.0 mm], and thickest [>3.0 mm]) RESULTS:: The median nevus thickness was 1.4 mm, and nevi were categorized (flat, thin, thicker, and thickest) in 1,140 (30%), 2052 (54%), 555 (15%), and 59 (<1%), respectively. There were differences in tumor diameter (2.5, 4.8, 7.5, and 9.3 mm; P < 0.01), optical coherence tomography detection of overlying subretinal fluid (<1, 4, 15, and 11%; P < 0.01), overlying retinal edema (<1, 3, 14, and 25%; P < 0.01), overlying drusen (23, 49, 64, and 64%; P < 0.01), overlying retinal pigment epithelial detachment (1, 4, 4, and 9%; P < 0.01), and overlying lipofuscin hyperautofluoresence (<1, 3, 6, and 7%; P < 0.01). Choroidal nevus transformation into melanoma (n = 90/2,355 cases, 3.8%) was found by Kaplan-Meier 7-year estimates (2.2, 6.1, 31.7, and 34.5%; P < 0.0001) and by hazard ratio (HR) compared with nevus ≤1.0 mm (not available, 4.7 [P = 0.01], 35.7 [P < 0.0001], and 52.0 [P < 0.0001]). For all thicknesses, those with growth displayed increase in mean basal diameter of 2.4 mm and thickness of 1.1 mm, optical coherence tomography increase in subretinal fluid (65%), autofluorescence increase in lipofuscin (40%), and ultrasonography increase in hollowness (30%). Multivariable risk factors, recalled by the mnemonic "To Find Small Ocular Melanoma Doing IMaging" (TFSOM-DIM) representing Thickness >2 mm (ultrasonography), Fluid subretinal (optical coherence tomography), Symptom vision loss (Va), Orange pigment (autofluorescence), Melanoma hollow (ultrasonography), and DIaMeter >5 mm, revealed factors per incremental thickness category (compared with flat) including thin (Fluid overlying, HR 6.1; DIaMeter >5 mm, HR 3.3), thicker (Fluid subretinal ≤3 mm from nevus, HR 5.7; Melanoma acoustic hollowness, HR 2.7), and thickest (Orange pigment, HR 9.1). CONCLUSION: Each incremental increase in choroidal nevus thickness demonstrated risk of growth into melanoma with HR (compared with flat) 4.7 for thin, 35.7 for thicker, and 52.0 for thickest. The increase from ≤2.0 mm to >2.0 mm thickness conferred the greatest rise for transformation.

Combination of multimodal imaging features predictive of choroidal nevus transformation into melanoma.

AIM: To characterise combinations of multimodal imaging risk factors and predictive value for choroidal nevus transformation into melanoma. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of multimodal imaging features for 3806 choroidal nevi from 1 January 2007 through 1 January 2017. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression analyses were used to calculate 5-year percentages of growth to melanoma and HR. RESULTS: Using multimodal imaging, six risk factors predictive of choroidal nevus transformation into melanoma were identified, namely tumour thickness >2 mm, subretinal fluid, symptoms of visual acuity loss to 20/50 or worse, orange pigment, hollow acoustic density and tumour largest basal diameter >5 mm. Kaplan-Meier 5-year estimated tumour growth was found in 1% of nevi with no risk factors, 11% (range 9%-37%) with one factor, 22% (12%-68%) with two factors, 34% (21%-100%) with three factors, 51% (0%-100%) with four factors and 55% (0%-100%) with five factors. HR for growth was 0.1 with no factor, 2.1-7.8 with one factor, 1.8-12.1 with two factors, 4.0-24.4 with three factors, 4.6-170.0 with four factors and 12.0-595.0 with five factors. The highest HR with each combination of two, three, four or five risk factors always included symptoms of visual acuity loss and orange pigment. CONCLUSION: Six risk factors for choroidal nevus transformation into melanoma by multimodal imaging have been identified. Risk for transformation into melanoma is 1% when no factors are present, and approaches 100% with specific combinations of three or more risk factors. Understanding how combinations of factors influence risk of transformation into melanoma can guide counselling and treatment decisions.