Canadian midwives' perspectives on the clinical impacts of point of care ultrasound in obstetrical care: A concurrent mixed-methods study.

Introduction: Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) is used globally in obstetrics to conduct real time bedside ultrasound scans to answer a clinical question, and it may be conducted by a non-sonography healthcare practitioner. The College of Midwives of Ontario expanded the scope of practice in 2018 to allow registered midwives to perform POCUS during clinical assessments. In response, a POCUS training curriculum for practicing midwives was developed. This paper reports on the perceptions of learners about the impact of this training on their clinical practice. Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study to understand learner perceptions. Data collection included surveys at four time points over a year, and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed through descriptive statistics, and qualitative analyses used a constructivist approach to grounded theory. Results: The frequency of POCUS use within antenatal care increased among learners, with common applications including assessment of fetal presentation and confirmation of viability. POCUS was seen to holistically aid practitioners care by providing additional skills and knowledge to improve care quality and access to care, particularly for remote areas where ultrasounds are not easily available. However, participants articulated a need for clearer regulatory guidelines outlining how this technology should be applied in midwifery. Equipment purchasing and maintaining costs were a barrier for many midwives. Conclusions: Participants who had access to a device are continuing to use sonography within their clinics to provide comprehensive midwifery care informed by real-time ultrasound assessments. POCUS scans were seen to offer many benefits to improve patient care.

Mediating expectations and experiences that influence birth experiences in Canada's first Alongside Midwifery Unit.

BACKGROUND: Globally, midwifery-led birthing units are associated with excellent maternal and neonatal outcomes, and positive childbirth experiences. However, little is known about what aspects of midwife-led units contribute to favorable experiences and overall satisfaction. Our aim was to explore and describe midwifery service user experiences at Canada's first Alongside Midwifery Unit (AMU). METHODS: We used a qualitative, grounded theory approach using semi-structured interviews with recipients of midwifery care at the AMU. FINDINGS: Data were collected from twenty-eight participants between September 2018 and March 2020. Our generated theory explains how birth experiences and satisfaction were influenced by how well the AMU aligned with expectations or desired experiences related to the following four themes: (1) maintaining the midwifery model of care, (2) emphasizing control and choice, (3) facilitating interprofessional relationships, and (4) appreciating the unique AMU birthing environment. CONCLUSION: Canada's first AMU met or exceeded service-user expectations, resulting in high levels of satisfaction with their birth experience. Maintaining core elements of the midwifery model of care, promoting high levels of autonomy, and facilitating positive interprofessional interactions are crucial elements contributing to childbirth satisfaction in the AMU environment.

Making Space for Midwifery in a Hospital: Exploring the Built Birth Environment of Canada's First Alongside Midwifery Unit.

BACKGROUND: Canada's first alongside midwifery unit (AMU) was intentionally informed by evidence-based birth environment design principals, building on the growing evidence that the built environment can shape experiences, satisfaction, and birth outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of the built environment of the AMU for both service users and midwives. This study aimed to explore the meanings that individuals attribute to the built environment and how the built environment impacted people's experiences. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study using a grounded theory methodology for data collection and analysis. Our research question and data collection tools were underpinned by a sociospatial conceptual approach. All midwives and all those who received midwifery care at the unit were eligible to participate. Data were collected through a structured online survey, interviews, and focus group. RESULTS: Fifty-nine participants completed the survey, and interviews or focus group were completed with 28 service users and 14 midwives. Our findings demonstrate high levels of satisfaction with the birth environment. We developed a theoretical model, where "making space" for midwifery in the hospital contributed to positive birth experiences and overall satisfaction with the built environment. The core elements of this model include creating domestic space in an institutional setting, shifting the technological approach, and shared ownership of the unit. CONCLUSIONS: Our model for creating, shifting, and sharing as a way to make space for midwifery can serve as a template for how intentional design can be used to promote favorable outcomes and user satisfaction.

Promoting safety and role clarity among health professionals on Canada's First Alongside Midwifery Unit (AMU): A mixed-methods evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: Globally, midwife-led units are associated with improved clinical outcomes and childbirth satisfaction, but little is known about the impact of the model on health professionals themselves and interprofessional collaboration. The aim of this research was to describe the experiences of health professionals providing care in Canada's first Alongside Midwifery Unit. DESIGN: A mixed-methods evaluation exploring healthcare provider's experiences using an online survey and qualitative semi-structured interviews and focus groups. SETTING: Canada's first Alongside Midwifery Unit, opened at X in 2018. In the Ontario context, the model reorganizes the way in which midwifery services are integrated in the hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Midwives, obstetricians, nurses, pediatricians, anesthetists, and other healthcare providers participated. MEASUREMENTS & FINDINGS: 82 online surveys, 17 semi-structured interviews and one focus group were completed. Providers agreed that they perceived the Alongside Midwifery Unit was a success (89%) and perceived satisfaction among those receiving care on the unit(93%). The majority of providers were satisfied working on the unit (82%) and reported greater role clarity in the new model (85%) compared to the traditional model of midwifery services. Four main themes emerged from the health professionals' perspectives regarding how the unit impacted care: promoting safety, clarifying roles, facilitating collaboration, and managing change. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Overall, healthcare professionals had positive experiences working on the AMU, including improved role clarity and interprofessional relationships, and they perceived high levels of satisfaction among those giving birth on the unit. Our findings indicate the Alongside Midwifery Unit model can be beneficial for health professionals, women and birthing people.

Lessons learned from the implementation of Canada's first alongside midwifery unit: A qualitative explanatory study.

BACKGROUND: In July 2018, Canada's first midwife-led alongside midwifery unit (AMU) opened at Markham Stouffville Hospital (MSH) in Markham, Ontario. Our objectives were to examine how the conditions at MSH made it possible for the hospital to create the first AMU in Canada and to identify lessons to inform spread by examining how characteristics of the intervention, the inner and outer settings, the individuals involved, and the processes used influenced the MSH-AMU implementation process. METHODS: We conducted key informant interviews and document analysis using Yin's research methods. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to conceptualize the study and develop semi-structured interview guides. We recruited key informants, including midwives and other health professionals, hospital leaders, leaders of midwifery organizations, and consumers, by email using both purposive and respondent driven sampling. Interviews were digitally recorded and professionally transcribed. We identified documents through key informants and searches of Nexis Uni, Hansard, and Google databases. We analyzed the data using a coding framework based on Greenhalgh et al.'s evidence-informed theory of the diffusion of innovations. RESULTS: Between November 2018 and February 2019, we conducted fifteen key informant interviews. We identified thirteen relevant documentary sources of evidence, including news media coverage, website content, Ontario parliamentary records, and hospital documents. Conditions that influenced implementation of the AMU fell within the following domains from Greenhalgh's diffusion of innovations theory: the innovation, the outer context, the inner context - system antecedents for innovation and system readiness for innovation, communication and influence, linkage - design phase and implementation stage, and the implementation process. While several unique features of MSH supported innovation, factors that could be adopted elsewhere include organizational investment in the development of midwifery leadership skills, intentional use of change management theory, broad stakeholder involvement in the design and implementation processes, and frequent, open communication. CONCLUSIONS: The example of the MSH-AMU illustrates the value of utilizing best practices with respect to change management and system transformation and demonstrates the potential value of using implementation theory to drive the successful implementation of AMUs. Lessons learned from the MSH-AMU can inform successful spread of this innovative service model.

A Survey of University Students' Preferences for Midwifery Care and Community Birth Options in 8 High-Income Countries.

INTRODUCTION: Midwifery care is associated with positive birth outcomes, access to community birth options, and judicious use of interventions. The aim of this study was to characterize and compare maternity care preferences of university students across a range of maternity care systems and to explore whether preferences align with evidence-based recommendations and options available. METHODS: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was completed in 2014 and 2015 by a convenience sample of university students in 8 high-income countries across 4 continents (N = 4569). In addition to describing preferences for midwifery care and community birth options across countries, this study examined sociodemographic characteristics, psychological factors, knowledge about pregnancy and birth, and sources of information that shaped students' attitudes toward birth in relation to preferences for midwifery care and community birth options. RESULTS: Approximately half of the student respondents (48.2%) preferred midwifery-led care for a healthy pregnancy; 9.5% would choose to give birth in a birthing center, and 4.5% preferred a home birth. Preference for midwifery care varied from 10.3% among women in the United States to 78.6% among women in the United Kingdom. Preferences for home birth varied from 0.3% among US women to 18.3% among Canadian women. Women, health science students, those with low childbirth fear, those who learned about pregnancy and birth from friends (compared with other sources, eg, the media), and those who responded from Europe were significantly more likely to prefer midwifery care and community birth. High confidence in knowledge of pregnancy and birth was linked to significantly higher odds of community birth preferences and midwifery care preferences. DISCUSSION: It would be beneficial to integrate childbirth education into high school curricula to promote knowledge of midwifery care, pregnancy, and childbirth and to reduce fear among prospective parents. Community birth options need to be expanded to meet demand among the next generation of maternity service users.

A cross-country survey of attitudes toward childbirth technologies and interventions among university students.

PROBLEM & AIM: Cultural beliefs that equate birth technology with progress, safety and convenience contribute to widespread acceptance of childbirth technology and interventions. Little is known about attitudes towards childbirth technology and interventions among the next generation of maternity care users and whether attitudes vary by country, age, gender, childbirth fear, and other factors. METHODS: Data were collected via online survey in eight countries. Students who had never had children, and who planned to have at least one child were eligible to participate. FINDINGS: The majority of participants (n=4569) were women (79.3%), and the median age was 22 years. More than half of students agreed that birth technology makes birth easier (55.8%), protects babies from harm (49.1%) and that women have a right to choose a medically non-indicated cesarean (50.8%). Respondents who had greater acceptance of childbirth technology and interventions were from countries with higher national caesarean birth rates, reported higher levels of childbirth fear, and were more likely to report that visual media or school-based education shaped their attitudes toward birth. Positive attitudes toward childbirth technology and interventions were also associated with less confidence in knowledge of birth, and more common among younger and male respondents. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Educational strategies to teach university students about pregnancy and birth in ways that does not frighten them and promotes critical reflection about childbirth technology are needed. This is especially true in countries with high rates of interventions that reciprocally shape culture norms, attitudes, and expectations.

A scoping review of how new midwifery practitioners transition to practice in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, United Kingdom and The Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: contemporary knowledge related to the experiences of new midwifery practitioners is limited to countries that run hospital-based transition to practice programmes within an employment contract arrangement, such as the United Kingdom, and Australia. Less is known of the experiences of New Midwifery Practitioners (NMPs) who transition into autonomous private practice in New Zealand, Canada and the Netherlands. PURPOSE: the purpose of this paper is to report on a scoping review of the way NMPs are transitioned to practice in the first year of registered practice across the selected countries. METHODS: this review accessed literature and government and professional sites to make comparisons between the transition to practice processes within five countries, and discusses the benefits and issues, associated with public hospital employment programs versus community based government funded midwifery group practices. FINDINGS: comparison of the way in which NMPs are transitioned to practice in the first year of registered practice between the selected countries shows important differences based on occupational organisation. Funding of maternity services influences how NMPs in each country are orientated and supported in their transition to registered practice. Direct comparisons between countries were difficult. More research is recommended to investigate NMPs' experiences of transition to practice in private practice.

Cross-cultural development and psychometric evaluation of a measure to assess fear of childbirth prior to pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of childbirth fear, in advance of pregnancy, and early identification of modifiable factors contributing to fear can inform public health initiatives and/or school-based educational programming for the next generation of maternity care consumers. We developed and evaluated a short fear of birth scale that incorporates the most common dimensions of fear reported by men and women prior to pregnancy, fear of: labour pain, being out of control and unable to cope with labour and birth, complications, and irreversible physical damage. METHODS: University students in six countries (Australia, Canada, England, Germany, Iceland, and the United States, n = 2240) participated in an online survey to assess their fears and attitudes about birth. We report internal consistency reliability, corrected-item-to-total correlations, factor loadings and convergent and discriminant validity of the new scale. RESULTS: The Childbirth Fear - Prior to Pregnancy (CFPP) scale showed high internal consistency across samples (α > 0.86). All corrected-item-to total correlations exceeded 0.45, supporting the uni-dimensionality of the scale. Construct validity of the CFPP was supported by a high correlation between the new scale and a two-item visual analogue scale that measures fear of birth (r > 0.6 across samples). Weak correlations of the CFPP with scores on measures that assess related psychological states (anxiety, depression and stress) support the discriminant validity of the scale. CONCLUSION: The CFPP is a short, reliable and valid measure of childbirth fear among young women and men in six countries who plan to have children.

Models of organization of maternity care by midwives in Canada: a descriptive review.

Most provinces in Canada now offer regulated midwifery, but the way services are delivered across the country varies. The Canadian Midwifery Regulators Consortium has identified a need to examine the different ways in which care is being organized; this is to determine what elements are essential to maintain and where flexibility is desirable, in order to promote growth of the profession and maximize the contribution of midwifery to the provision of services. In April 2012 a planning meeting (funded by Canadian Institutes of Health Research) brought together midwifery leaders, researchers, regulators, and lead clinicians of several maternity service programs across Canada. The various approaches to organizing care were discussed and three of the programs presented were selected for this descriptive review because of their unique approaches and ability to respond to the needs of communities and of care providers within those communities who strive to deliver sustainable maternity care. The programs include an interprofessional group-care approach in British Columbia, an expanded scope of practice in an underserved community in the Northwest Territories, and an interprofessional collaboration of primary maternity caregivers in Nova Scotia. Each is discussed in terms of the population served, the program itself, and the fit of that microsystem within the larger health care system. The organization of maternity care must address the needs of communities and providers alike to make the greatest contribution. Through collaborative and creative organizational approaches, midwives have an opportunity to contribute in a meaningful way and increase their impact on the provision of services.

Why home birth? A qualitative study exploring women's decision making about place of birth in two Canadian provinces.

OBJECTIVE: the aim of this study was to increase our understanding of why Canadian women choose to give birth at home. Despite on-going debate regarding the safety of home birth, a small number of Canadian women choose home as a place to give birth. The factors influencing a woman's decision to plan a home birth remain poorly understood. DESIGN: a qualitative, grounded theory approach using semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS: a purposive sample of women from two Canadian provinces, who planned to give birth at home in their current pregnancy or who had planned a home birth within the last 2 years. FINDINGS: thematic analysis highlighted key motivating factors as well as a decision-making framework by which women chose home birth. The decision making process includes an exploration of internal motivators for wanting home birth, a phase of information gathering and taking ownership for the decision to give birth at home. KEY CONCLUSIONS: the study showed that women in two geographically distinct parts of Canada approach decision making around home birth in a similar fashion and provides a framework for decision making for choosing to birth at home. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: improved understanding of the decision making process for choice of birth place is useful for midwives for the provision of information to their clients and for midwifery policy and practice within Canada.

Women's experiences of participating in the early external cephalic version 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: The international, multicenter External Cephalic Version 2 (ECV2) Trial compared early external cephalic version at 34(0/7) to 35(6/7) weeks with that at greater than 37 weeks. A total of 1,543 women were randomized from 68 centers in 21 countries. The goal of this component of the trial was to understand women's views about participation in a research trial and timing of external cephalic version. METHODS: A postpartum questionnaire was completed containing a 5-point Likert scale examining contact and availability of staff, choice of timing of external cephalic version, preference of randomization, convenience of participating, and overall satisfaction. Participants also completed two open-ended questions related to timing of external cephalic version and satisfaction with the trial. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were used to analyze data. RESULTS: A total of 1,458 women completed the questionnaire, of whom 86 percent said "yes"-they would participate in the trial again. Themes influencing decisions about participating were perceptions of the external cephalic version experience, preferred mode of delivery, preferred timing of external cephalic version, and perceptions of the effectiveness of external cephalic version and of the trial environment. Many participants preferred the early timing of the procedure offered through the trial because of perceived advantages of a smaller baby being easier to turn and the opportunity for repeat procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Women were positive about their participation in the trial. Early external cephalic version was preferred over the traditional timing as it was perceived to afford both physiologic and practical advantages.

Comparison of midwifery, family medicine, and obstetric patients' understanding of weight gain during pregnancy: a minority of women report correct counselling.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that differences in models of care between health care providers would result in variations in patients' reports of counselling. Our objective was to compare what women reported being advised about weight gain during pregnancy and the risks of inappropriate weight gain according to their type of health care provider. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a self-administered questionnaire at obstetric, midwifery, and family medicine clinics in Hamilton, Ontario. Women were eligible to participate if they had had at least one prenatal visit, could read English, and had a live, singleton pregnancy. RESULTS: Three hundred and eight women completed the survey, a 93% response rate. Care for 90% of the group was divided approximately evenly between midwives, family physicians, and obstetricians. A minority of women looked after by any of the types of care providers reported being counselled correctly about how much weight to gain during pregnancy (16.3%, 10.3%, 9.2%, and 5.7% of patients of midwives, family physicians, obstetricians, or other types of care providers, respectively, P = 0.349). A minority of women with any category of care provider was planning to gain an amount of weight that fell within the guidelines or reported being told that there were risks to themselves or their babies with inappropriate gain. CONCLUSION: In this study comparing reported counselling between patients of obstetricians, midwives, family physicians, and other health care providers, low rates of counselling about gestational weight gain were universally reported. There is a common need for more effective counselling.

Midwifery care in eight industrialized countries: how does Canadian midwifery compare?

OBJECTIVES: Much has been written about the status of midwifery in developing countries, yet there is limited knowledge and analysis of the role of midwifery in the provision of maternity care in the developed world. The purpose of this study was to better understand how midwifery in Canada compares with midwifery in other developed countries with particular attention to educational preparation, scope of practice, and the contribution of midwives to the overall provision of maternity care. METHODS: Eight countries were selected on the basis of comparably low maternal mortality rates (defined as < 10/100,000 live births). Document analysis and a survey of key informants were used to develop an understanding of the role of midwifery in the various jurisdictions. We then undertook an analysis of similarities and differences among models. RESULTS: Variations in models of midwifery exist within and among the countries studied. Midwifery in Canada is most similar to midwifery in the Netherlands and New Zealand with regard to the model of practice, continuity of care, choice of birth place and degree of autonomy. CONCLUSION: Midwifery in Canada is growing, but offers a relatively small contribution to the national provision of maternity services in comparison with other countries. The growth of midwifery in Canada may play a key role in lowering intervention rates and strengthening maternity care as is evidenced in other industrialized nations where midwifery care is an integral part of maternity services.