Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 7(12): e52339, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23272239

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are commonly prescribed for epilepsy and bipolar disorder but little is known about their use in pregnancy. We examined secular trends in AED prescribing in pregnancy and pregnancy as a determinant for stopping AED prescribing. METHODS: We identified 174,055 pregnancies from The Health Improvement Network UK primary care database. Secular trends in AED prescribing during pregnancy were examined between 1994 and 2009. We used Cox's regression analyses to compare time to discontinuation of AED prescriptions between pregnant and non-pregnant women and to identify predictors of discontinuation of AEDs in pregnancy. RESULTS: Prescribing of carbamazepine and sodium valproate have declined since 1994 despite being the most commonly prescribed AEDs in pregnancy up to 2004. Prescribing of lamotrigine in pregnancy has steadily increased and has been the most popular AED prescribed in pregnancy since 2004. Pregnant women with epilepsy were twice as likely to stop receiving AEDs (Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.00, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.62-2.47) when compared to non-pregnant women and for women with bipolar disorder this was even higher (HR 3.07, 95% CI 2.04-4.62). For pregnant women with epilepsy, those receiving AEDs less regularly before pregnancy were more likely to stop receiving AEDs in pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Lamotrigine has been increasingly prescribed in pregnancy over older AEDs namely carbamazepine and sodium valproate. Pregnancy is a strong determinant for the discontinuation of AED prescribing particularly for women with bipolar disorder.


Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Adulto , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Bipolar/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos de Coortes , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez
2.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 72(7): 979-85, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21457681

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Potential adverse effects of antidepressants during pregnancy have caused concern about their use. There are, however, very limited detailed data on patterns of antidepressant prescribing in pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: To examine secular trends in prescribing during pregnancy, to assess whether pregnancy is a major determinant for stopping antidepressants, and to identify characteristics of those who stopped antidepressants during pregnancy. METHOD: In this cohort study, we obtained data on 114,999 pregnant women (median age at delivery, 30.5 years [interquartile range, 26-34 years]) who had a live birth between 1992 and 2006 and 22,677 nonpregnant women from The Health Improvement Network primary care database, one of the largest sources of continuous anonymized primary care data in the United Kingdom and broadly representative of UK general practice. This database includes information on age, sex, medical diagnosis and symptoms, health promotion activities, referrals to secondary care, and prescriptions for each registered individual. The database also holds information about social deprivation as measured using quintiles of the Townsend score. We used Cox regression analysis to compare time to last prescription in pregnant versus nonpregnant women and to identify characteristics of those women who stopped antidepressants during pregnancy. RESULTS: Antidepressant prescribing in pregnancy increased nearly 4-fold from 1992 to 2006 (relative risk = 3.87; 95% CI, 1.73-8.66; P < .001). Since 2001, approximately 3% of the cohort received antidepressants at some stage during pregnancy. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors accounted for approximately 80% of the prescribed antidepressants. Antidepressants were more likely to be stopped in pregnant than in nonpregnant women, in particular during the first 6 weeks of pregnancy (hazard ratio = 5.19; 95% CI, 4.85-5.56; P < .001). Only 10% of women treated before pregnancy still received antidepressants at the start of the third trimester. In contrast, 35% of nonpregnant women were still treated after a similar time period. CONCLUSIONS: Although antidepressant prescribing in pregnancy increased nearly 4-fold from 1992 to 2006, pregnancy was a major determinant of cessation of antidepressant medication, and most women did not receive further antidepressant prescriptions beyond 6 weeks of gestation. This finding may be explained by concerns about potential adverse effects of the medications, even though these concerns need to be balanced against the potential harm of inadequate treatment of depression during pregnancy.


Assuntos
Antidepressivos/administração & dosagem , Antidepressivos/efeitos adversos , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Estudos de Coortes , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/psicologia , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Feminino , Medicina Geral , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Adesão à Medicação , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Complicações na Gravidez/psicologia , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/administração & dosagem , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/efeitos adversos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Reino Unido , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...