Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide as an Inflammatory Biomarker in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with or without Concurrent Diagnosis of Asthma: The Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease (CanCOLD).

We studied whether fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) can differentiate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with concurrent diagnosis of asthma from COPD-only as well as its ability to predict disease severity and progression. This study was embedded in the Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease (CanCOLD). Subjects of ≥40 years old completed FENO measurements were subdivided into four groups, including COPD (N = 86 [COPD-only (N = 35) and COPD with concurrent diagnosis of asthma (N = 51)], healthy (N = 72), and at risk (N = 151). Three of the most common clinical definitions were used for characterizing COPD with concurrent diagnosis of asthma: 1) atopy and self-reported physician diagnosis of asthma, 2) ≥12% and ≥200 ml post-bronchodilator FEV1; 3) self-reported physician diagnosis of asthma. FENO values were classified using quartiles and the American Thoracic Society (ATS) guideline 2011. Compared to COPD-only, more COPD with concurrent diagnosis of asthma had a significant FENO50 level of [Formula: see text] 33.5 ppb (fourth quartile) than COPD-only (p = 0.045, 0.011, and 0.006, for definition 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Considering the ATS guideline 2011, fewer COPD with concurrent diagnosis of asthma had FENO50 < 25 than COPD-only, which was statistically significant with definition 1 and 3 (p = 0.038 and 0.026, respectively). FENO as a biomarker has the potential to be used as a complementary value for differentiating COPD with concurrent diagnosis of asthma from COPD-only. Further studies should be conducted on validated definitions of COPD with concurrent diagnosis of asthma, which may include a reference to the type of airway inflammation in addition to the clinical definition.

Undiagnosed Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Contributes to the Burden of Health Care Use. Data from the CanCOLD Study.

RATIONALE: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains undiagnosed in many individuals with persistent airflow limitation. These individuals may be susceptible to exacerbation-like respiratory events that consume health care resources. OBJECTIVES: To compare exacerbation-like respiratory events, event prevalence, and differences in the odds of using medication and/or health services between subjects with diagnosed and undiagnosed COPD. METHODS: Subjects sampled from the general population participating in the CanCOLD (Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease) study, with at least 12 months of exacerbation-event follow-up who were classified as having physician-diagnosed or undiagnosed COPD were assessed. Exacerbation-like respiratory events were captured using a questionnaire administered every 3 months. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 355 subjects were undiagnosed and 150 were diagnosed with COPD. Undiagnosed subjects were less symptomatic and functionally impaired, had been prescribed fewer respiratory medications, and had better health status. The incidence of reported exacerbation-like events was higher in diagnosed subjects and increased in both groups with the severity of airflow obstruction. Although subjects with diagnosed COPD were more often prescribed medication for exacerbation events, health service use for exacerbation events was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Most subjects with COPD in Canada remain undiagnosed. These subjects are less symptomatic and impaired, which may partly explain lack of diagnosis. Although patients with undiagnosed COPD experience fewer exacerbations than those with diagnosed COPD, they use a similar amount of health services for exacerbation events; thus, the overall health system burden of exacerbations in those with undiagnosed COPD is considerable.