Elevation in serum uric acid levels predicts favourable response to erlotinib treatment in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Erlotinib is a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor which blocks the activation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a transmembrane receptor that is upregulated in many cancer types. Inhibition of angiogenesis with consequent impairments in intratumoral microcirculation is one of the mechanisms through which EGFR inhibition halts the progression of cancer. A consequence of impaired microcirculation is intratumoral hypoxia, which results in increases in serum uric acid levels. The goal of this study was to investigate the relationship between serum uric acid levels and response to erlotinib in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A total of 56 patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer who received erlotinib for a duration of at least 3 months were included in this retrospective cohort study. Demographic characteristics, progression status, baseline serum uric levels and 3-month serum uric acid levels were recorded and analysed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Of the study population, 21 (37.5%) were female and 35 (62.5%) were male patients. No significant difference in above demographic characteristics was observed among exitus, survivor with progression and survivor without progression groups. Patients who responded favourably to erlotinib with no progression of their disease had significantly increased uric acid levels at 3-month follow-up (P = .01). Such a correlation was not observed if the patient was exitus (P = .47) or had progressed on erlotinib therapy (P = .19). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study is the first to demonstrate significant increases in serum uric acid levels in patients with metastatic NSCLC who responded favourably to erlotinib and had no progression under erlotinib therapy. Further studies are required to confirm and characterize serum uric acid as a novel biomarker in predicting the outcome in those with metastatic NSCLC.

Nine weeks versus 1 year adjuvant trastuzumab in patients with early breast cancer: an observational study by the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG).

BACKGROUND: Optimal duration of adjuvant trastuzumab in early breast cancer is an unresolved issue. In this observational study, we compared the outcome of 9 weeks and 1 year adjuvant trastuzumab in early breast cancer patients in Turkey. METHODS: Records of 680 patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer who received adjuvant trastuzumab plus chemotherapy were obtained and patients were followed up to compare the disease-free survival (DFS) outcome of 9 weeks versus 1 year trastuzumab. RESULTS: Nine weeks and 1 year trastuzumab was given to 202 (29.7 %) and 478 (70.3 %) patients, respectively. There was a significantly lower rate of patients with negative lymph nodes in the 9-week trastuzumab group. At median 3 years of follow-up from the date of starting trastuzumab, the DFS rates were 88.6 and 85.6 %, respectively (p = 0.670). When adjusted for all the prognostic factors that were significant on univariate analysis, again there was no significant difference in DFS between the groups (HR 0.675; 95 % CI 0.370-1.231; p = 0.200). Cardiac toxicity defined as a ≥15 % decrease in LVEF was significantly higher in the 1-year trastuzumab group (1.88 % versus none for 1-year and 9-week trastuzumab groups, respectively; p = 0.050). CONCLUSION: The results of this observational study suggest that DFS outcome of 9 weeks of adjuvant trastuzumab may be comparable to 1 year adjuvant trastuzumab: this needs confirmation by randomized trials.