Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Biomech ; 37(6): 947-52, 2004 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15111084

RESUMO

Instrumented bone staples were first introduced as an alternative to surface-mounted strain gauges for use in human in vivo bone strain measurements because their fixation to bone is secure and requires not only minimally invasive surgery. Bench-top bone bending models have shown that the output from strain gauged bone staples compares favorably to that of traditional mounted gauges. However their within- and across-subject performance at sites typically instrumented in vivo has never been examined. This study used seven human cadaver lower extremities with an age range of 23-81 years old and a dynamic gait simulator to examine and compare axial strains in the mid tibial diaphysis and on the dorsal surface of the second metatarsal as measured simultaneously with strain gauged bone staples and with traditional surface-mounted gauges. Rosette configurations were used at the tibial site for deriving principal compression and tension, and shear strains. Axial outputs from the two gauge types demonstrated strong linear relationships for the tibia (r(2)=0.78-0.94) and the second metatarsal (r(2)=0.96-0.99), but coefficients (slopes) for the relationship were variable (range 7-20), across subjects and across sites. The apparent low reliability of strain gauged staples may be explained by the fact that both strain gauged staples and surface strain gauges are inexact to some degree, do not measure strains from exactly the same areas and strain gauged staples reflect surface strains as well as deformations within the cortex. There were no relationships for the principal tibia compression, tension or shear strain measurements derived from the two rosette gauge types, reflecting the very different anatomical areas measured by each of the constructs in this study. Strain gauged bone staples may be most useful in comparing relative axial intra-subject differences between activities, but inter-subject variability may require larger sample sizes to detect differences between populations.


Assuntos
Ossos do Pé/fisiologia , Suturas , Tíbia/fisiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cadáver , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estresse Mecânico
2.
Foot Ankle Int ; 23(3): 230-5, 2002 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11934065

RESUMO

Human in vivo tibial strains during vigorous walking have not been found to exceed 1200 microstrains. These values are below those found in ex vivo studies (>3000 microstrains) to cause cortical bone fatigue failure, suggesting that an intermediate bone remodeling response may be associated with tibial stress fractures. Metatarsal stress fractures, however, often develop before there is time for such a response to occur. Simultaneous in vivo axial strains were measured at the mid diaphysis of the second metatarsal and the tibia in two subjects. Peak axial metatarsal compression strains and strain rates were significantly higher than those of the tibia during treadmill walking and jogging both barefoot and with running shoes and during simple calisthenics. During barefoot treadmill walking metatarsal compression strains were greater than 2500 microstrains. During one- and two-leg vertical jumps and broad jumping, both metatarsal compression and tension strains were >3000 microstrains. Compression and tension strains in the metatarsus unlike those of the tibia may be sufficiently high even during moderate exertional activities to cause fatigue failure of bone secondary to the number of loading cycles without an intermediate bone remodeling response.


Assuntos
Fraturas de Estresse/fisiopatologia , Ossos do Metatarso/fisiopatologia , Tíbia/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Remodelação Óssea , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos de Pesquisa , Sapatos , Estresse Mecânico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA