Staged vs. simultaneous bilateral nephrectomy and kidney transplantation in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: Outcomes and costs.

INTRODUCTION: We sought to compare cost and safety outcomes of patients who received a kidney transplant and bilateral nephrectomy in either a simultaneous or staged approach. METHODS: We reviewed all adult patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) who received a kidney transplant and underwent bilateral nephrectomy between 2008 and 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: staged (nephrectomy prior to transplant) and simultaneous (nephrectomy at the time of transplant). The primary outcome was cumulative cost of nephrectomy and transplantation ($CAD). We analyzed several secondary outcomes, including 90-day Clavien-Dindo complication rates. RESULTS: A total of 114 patients with ADPKD received a kidney transplant over 11 years. Of these, 28 patients underwent both nephrectomy and transplantation (10 staged, 18 simultaneous). More patients in the simultaneous group had a living donor transplant (83% vs. 0%, p<0.001). Creatinine clearance at one year/last followup did not differ between groups (p=0.12). With similar overall complication rates between groups, the transfusion rate was also similar between groups (simultaneous 50% vs. staged 40%, p=0.91). Total cost was lower in the simultaneous group ($23 775.33 CAD vs. $35 048.83 CAD, p<0.001), largely owing to a longer total length of stay in the staged group as compared to the simultaneous group (8.1 vs. 14.5 days, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that a simultaneous approach to bilateral nephrectomy and kidney transplantation provides potential cost savings with no adverse outcomes. This provides a rationale to investigate simultaneous nephrectomy and transplantation in the deceased donor setting.

Evaluating the Effects of Subnormothermic Perfusion with AP39 in a Novel Blood-Free Model of Ex Vivo Kidney Preservation and Reperfusion.

The use of blood for normothermic and subnormothermic kidney preservation hinders the translation of these approaches and promising therapeutics. This study evaluates whether adding hydrogen sulfide donor AP39 to Hemopure, a blood substitute, during subnormothermic perfusion improves kidney outcomes. After 30 min of renal pedicle clamping, porcine kidneys were treated to 4 h of static cold storage (SCS-4 °C) or subnormothermic perfusion at 21 °C with Hemopure (H-21 °C), Hemopure + 200 nM AP39 (H200nM-21 °C) or Hemopure + 1 µM AP39 (H1µM-21 °C). Then, kidneys were reperfused with Hemopure at 37 °C for 4 h with metabolic support. Perfusate composition, tissue oxygenation, urinalysis and histopathology were analyzed. During preservation, the H200nM-21 °C group exhibited significantly higher urine output than the other groups and significantly higher tissue oxygenation than the H1µM-21 °C group at 1 h and 2h. During reperfusion, the H200nM-21 °C group exhibited significantly higher urine output and lower urine protein than the other groups. Additionally, the H200nM-21 °C group exhibited higher perfusate pO2 levels than the other groups and significantly lower apoptotic injury than the H-21 °C and the H1µM-21 °C groups. Thus, subnormothermic perfusion at 21 °C with Hemopure + 200 nM AP39 improves renal outcomes. Additionally, our novel blood-free model of ex vivo kidney preservation and reperfusion could be useful for studying other therapeutics.

Unusual suspects: Real-time physiological evaluation of stressors during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to document the variability of faculty surgeon electrodermal activity (EDA) peaks during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) to determine the effect of case difficulty and learner expertise on the stress response. METHODS: EDA for a single faculty surgeon was captured over 15 LDN cases using an Empatica E4 wristband. During each case, one of three transplant fellows (novice, intermediate, or expert level LDN expertise) participated. Difficulty was rated preoperatively as "low/moderate/high" by the faculty. EDA peaks were collected and analyzed; the frequency and magnitude of EDA peaks, case difficulty, and fellow expertise were compared using a two-way factorial ANOVA. RESULTS: The main effects of learner expertise (F[2, 308]=11.27, p<0.001) and difficulty rating (F[2, 414]=15.13, p<0.001) were significant. The interaction between difficulty and expertise on faculty EDA peaks was also significant (F[3, 391]=14.29, p<0.001). The novice fellow resulted in higher faculty EDA levels compared to intermediate and expert fellows on low-difficulty cases, but not moderate- or high-difficulty cases. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report examining faculty surgeon EDA across cases of varying difficulty and varying learner expertise during a high-stakes operation. EDA levels were inversely proportional to the expertise of the learner and case difficulty, suggestive of a significant impact of learner autonomy on faculty stress response.