Impact of genotype on clinical course in sickle cell disease and the utility of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio: a ten-year single-institution experience.

BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a diverse group of blood disorders with significant global disease burden. Contemporary interest in the underlying inflammatory paradigm of SCD has emphasized the role of the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a prognostic inflammatory marker. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 268 hospitalized patients with SCDs of different genotypes (HbSS, HbSß0 thalassemia, HbSß+ thalassemia, and HbSC), totaling 3329 hospital admissions over a 10-year period. Patients were stratified into SS/Sß0 and Sß+/SC groups for statistical analysis of parameters collected at steady state and at hospital admission. RESULTS: At steady state, per unit increase of hemoglobin values was associated with reduced odds of ≥ 2 hospital admissions per year in SS/Sß0 and Sß+/SC groups; per unit increase in platelet count and white blood cell count was associated with increased odds only in the SS/Sß0 group. The NLR had no association in either group. During admission, a cutoff of NLR = 3.5 discerned infection with a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 57%. Performance improved when excluding patients on outpatient hydroxyurea therapy (cutoff of NLR = 3.5; sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 64%). CONCLUSION: This study supports the utility of NLR as an accessible adjunctive clinical tool in SCD prognostication.

Variations in Awareness of Association Between Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Cardiovascular Risk by Specialty.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death among women. Adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs), including pre-eclampsia (PE), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and pre-term birth (PTB) are associated with future maternal CVD risk. However, data on awareness of the association between APOs and long-term CVD risk among physicians in different specialties are lacking. This study assessed awareness of this association and whether this knowledge varies by specialty. METHODS: An anonymous web-based voluntary survey was sent to physicians in internal medicine (IM), family medicine (FM), obstetrics-gynecology (Ob-Gyn) and cardiology. The questions aimed to assess a physician's knowledge regarding identification of APOs and their association with future CVD risk and knowledge of CVD risk factor screening in women with APOs and future CVD risk. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 53 physicians, of whom 21% were in IM, 26% in FM, 23% in Ob-Gyn and 30% in cardiology. Based on the responses, cardiologists screened most frequently for APOs, with 56% always screening a female patient and 31% often screening. Only half of the IM and FM physicians acknowledged awareness of the association between APOs and CVD risk. Respondents in all specialties recognized PE and GDM as APOs linked to long-term maternal CVD risk, but failed to associate PTB as an APO. The majority of physicians in IM, FM and cardiology also lacked the knowledge of how often to appropriately screen for CVD risk factors associated with APOs. CONCLUSION: Awareness of the association between APO and future maternal CVD risk varies by specialty. A significant percentage of the physicians who responded to the survey did not routinely ask about APOs when assessing CVD risk and failed to identify PTB as a risk factor for APOs. Education on this topic and targeted efforts to improve screening for APOs are needed within all specialties to help reduce CVD morbidity and mortality.