Training Programs on Endoscopic Scoring Systems for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Lead to a Significant Increase in Interobserver Agreement Among Community Gastroenterologists.

Background and Aims: Endoscopic outcomes are increasingly used in clinical trials and in routine practice for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] in order to reach more objective patient evaluations than possible using only clinical features. However, reproducibility of endoscopic scoring systems used to categorize endoscopic activity has been reported to be suboptimal. The aim of this study was to analyse the inter-rated agreement of non-dedicated gastroenterologists on IBD endoscopic scoring systems, and to explore the effects of a dedicated training programme on agreement. Methods: A total of 237 physicians attended training courses on IBD endoscopic scoring systems, and they independently scored a set of IBD endoscopic videos for ulcerative colitis [with Mayo endoscopic subscore], post-operative Crohn's disease [with Rutgeerts score] and luminal Crohn's disease (with the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease [SESCD] and Crohn's Endoscopic Index of Severity [CDEIS]). A second round of scoring was collected after discussion about determinants of discrepancy. Interobserver agreement was measured by means of the Fleiss' kappa [kappa] or intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] as appropriate. Results: The inter-rater agreement increased from kappa 0.51 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.48-0.55) to 0.76 [95% CI 0.72-0.79] for the Mayo endoscopic subscore, and from 0.45 [95% CI 0.40-0.50] to 0.79 [0.74-0.83] for the Rutgeerts score before and after the training programme, respectively, and both differences were significant [P < 0.0001]. The ICC was 0.77 [95% CI 0.56-0.96] for SESCD and 0.76 [0.54- 0.96] for CDEIS, respectively, with only one measurement. Discussion: The basal inter-rater agreement of inexperienced gastroenterologists focused on IBD management is moderate; however, a dedicated training programme can significantly impact on inter-rater agreement, increasing it to levels expected among expert central reviewers.

Inter-observer agreement in endoscopic scoring systems: preliminary report of an ongoing study from the Italian Group for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD).

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic activity has become a therapeutic endpoint in inflammatory bowel disease. Aim of this study was to evaluate inter-observer agreement for endoscopic scores in a real-life setting. METHODS: 14 gastroenterologists with experience in inflammatory bowel disease care and endoscopic scoring reviewed videos of ulcerative colitis (n=13) and postoperative (n=10) and luminal (n=8) Crohn's disease. The Mayo subscore for ulcerative colitis, Rutgeerts score for postoperative Crohn's disease, Crohn's disease endoscopic index of severity (CDEIS), and the simple endoscopic score-Crohn's disease (SES-CD) for luminal Crohn's disease were calculated. A subset of five endoscopic clips were assessed by 30 general gastroenterologists without specific experience in endoscopic scores. Kappa statistics and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to measure agreement. RESULTS: Mayo subscore agreement was suboptimal: kappas were 0.53 (95% confidence interval 0.47-0.56) and 0.71 (0.67-0.76) for the two groups. Rutgeerts score agreement was fair: kappas were 0.57 (0.51-0.65) and 0.67 (0.60-0.72). Agreements for CDEIS and SES-CD were good: intraclass correlation coefficients for the two groups were 0.83 (0.54-1.00) and 0.67 (0.36-0.97) for CDEIS and 0.93 (0.76-1.00) and 0.68 (0.35-0.97) for SES-CD, respectively. CONCLUSION: The reproducibility of endoscopic scores in inflammatory bowel disease remains suboptimal, which could potentially have major effects on therapeutic choices.

Different cardiovascular responses to hemodialysis-induced fluid depletion and blood pressure compliance.

BACKGROUND: On the basis of cardiovascular compliance, hemodialysis (HD) patients can be classified as hypotension prone (HP) or hypotension resistant (HR). METHODS: We compare the hemodynamic behavior and myocardial performances in 6 HP and 6 HR patients before and after an isolated ultrafiltration (IU) session removing 3% of total body water. RESULTS: HP show higher basal plasma angiotensin II levels during IU (p<0.01), whereas angiotensin II remained unchanged in HR patients (p<0.001 between groups). The percentage changes of plasma volume (PV) was similar in the 2 groups. A significant reduction of cardiac index was observed only in the HP group (p<0.001 between groups). The mean values of heart rate remained significantly higher, whereas total peripheral resistances significantly fell in the HP in comparison with the HR group (p<0.001 between groups). During IU, the mean arterial pressure (MAP) changes were -10 +/- 3 mm Hg in the HP vs. -3.3 +/- 2 mm Hg in the HR group (p<0.001). Echocardiography data were collected before and after IU. All enrolled patients presented left ventricular hypertrophy; following IU, HP patients showed a reduction of mean left ventricular diameter (p<0.01), left atrial diameters and right atrial diameter, and a change in percentage of right atrium ejection fraction (p<0.001, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with HR patients, HP patients before and after IU showed a defective arteriovenous tone adjustment to the PV changes, with a hemodynamic picture of abnormal sympathetic stimulation. Moreover, a reduced cardiac preload with both atrial and ventricular underfilling in these patients is at risk for a sudden drop in MAP.