Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 70(8): 2862-2865, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35918931

RESUMO

Purpose: Phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is the standard of care for cataractous eyes. Monofocal IOLs are spherical or aspheric. The aspheric design of IOLs reduces the spherical and higher-order aberrations and impacts contrast sensitivity post cataract surgery. There are some studies, but data in the Indian setting with the IOLs we used is lacking. We aimed to compare the effect of implantation of spheric and aspheric foldable intraocular lenses on postoperative quality of vision, spherical aberration, and contrast sensitivity. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital with an ophthalmology specialty, data collection from January 2017 to May 2018 in 100 patients. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria were selected. Their preoperative and postoperative data were collected and divided into groups based on whether spherical or aspheric IOL was implanted after cataract surgery. Variables assessed were visual acuity on days 7 and 30, spherical aberrations, and contrast sensitivity was assessed at 1-month postoperative. Results: The mean age of the patients in this study was 64 ± 8 years with a majority of patients (60%) being females. There is no significant difference in postoperative visual acuity between the two groups. Internal SA was significantly lower (~50%) in eyes implanted with aspheric IOLs (P value = 0.004, 0.0001) compared with the spherical group. Contrast sensitivity of patients of the aspheric group was significantly better (P value <0.05). Conclusion: The optical design of the aspheric IOLs reduced spherical aberrations and increased contrast sensitivity.


Assuntos
Catarata , Lentes Intraoculares , Facoemulsificação , Idoso , Sensibilidades de Contraste , Feminino , Humanos , Implante de Lente Intraocular , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Desenho de Prótese , Pseudofacia
2.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 69(6): 1409-1413, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34011710

RESUMO

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative visual outcome after a Day 0 examination in patients with two follow-ups, one between Day 3 to Day 7 and other between Day 25 to Day 30 to those with a single ophthalmic follow-up directly after 25-30 Days and to assess the safety of deferral of the first follow-up visit at 1 week. Methods: Randomized Controlled Trial was conducted at a tertiary eye care hospital, with 848 patients enrolled for the study. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria were selected. Their pre-operative and post-operative data was collected and the patients were divided into groups based on the type of cataract surgery and the postoperative follow-up protocol through randomization. Results: No significant difference was observed in the postoperative visual outcome in patients that underwent postoperative review at Day 3-7 and Day 25-30 as opposed to those that followed up directly at Day 25-30 after a mandatory Day 0 examination for all patients. Conclusion: In patients with no preexisting ocular or systemic comorbidity undergoing an uneventful cataract surgery, the postoperative follow-up visit can be safely deferred until 4 weeks, without any impact on the postoperative visual outcome, thereby conserving the available resources which can be deviated towards better eye care services.


Assuntos
Extração de Catarata , Catarata , Seguimentos , Humanos , Período Pós-Operatório
3.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 68(11): 2421-2426, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33120631

RESUMO

PURPOSE: : To assess feasibility, acceptability, and outcome of multifocal intraocular lenses (IOL) in patients with bilateral immature cataract. METHODS: 1691 patients with bilateral immature cataract were included in the study. The feasibility of these IOLs was calculated by studying ocular parameters using Visionix VX120 and subjective characteristics. A prospective study was then conducted in 148 eyes of 74 patients in which multifocal IOLs were implanted. Their visual outcome was assessed using LogMAR for distance and Snellen's chart for near vision, contrast sensitivity by Pelli-Robson chart, and satisfaction using visual function-7 questionnaire. RESULTS: Considering ocular and subjective characteristics, it was feasible to implant the lens in 920 patients (54.40%) and the acceptability rate was 8.04%, most common reason for decreased acceptability was cost (85%) of IOL. The median distance uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) at day 7 and at 30 days was LogMAR 0.2 (0.1-0.3) and 0.15 (0.1-0.2), respectively, which was statistically significant compared to preoperative distance UCVA (P < 0.001). The median near UCVA at day 7 and 30 days was N6 for both and statistically significant (P < 0.001) compared to preoperative near UCVA. 77.02% patients had distance UCVA of LogMAR (0.0-0.2) and 91.8% had near UCVA of N6-N8 at 30 days. The contrast sensitivity was decreased in all patients. CONCLUSION: Appropriately selected patients can achieve spectacle independence and good visual satisfaction which begins with proper patient education, lifestyle and personality dynamics, and individualized weighing of benefits and side effects of multifocal IOLs.


Assuntos
Catarata , Lentes Intraoculares , Lentes Intraoculares Multifocais , Facoemulsificação , Sensibilidades de Contraste , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Implante de Lente Intraocular , Satisfação do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Desenho de Prótese
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...