The Hidden Risks of Perioperative Transfusions in Traumatic Lower Extremity Free Flap Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Blood transfusions have been associated with surgical complications; however, these studies are not specific to lower extremity (LE) reconstruction. We evaluated the effect of perioperative packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions on LE free flap outcomes in trauma patients. METHODS: Patients undergoing LE free flap reconstruction following acute injuries from 2016 to 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The perioperative period for transfusions was defined as ± 3 days from the procedure. Parameters included demographics, perioperative characteristics, and outcomes. Major complications were complications requiring reoperation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify associations. RESULTS: Of the 205 patients, 48% received PRBCs perioperatively. There was a trend toward higher major complications rate in the transfusion group (19 vs. 10%, p = 0.09). Wound size, injury severity score (ISS), and intraoperative estimated blood loss were greater in the transfusion group (p < 0.01). Preoperative hemoglobin/hematocrit were lower in the transfusion group (p < 0.001). Units of PRBCs transfused were independently associated with major complications on multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.34, confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-1.70, p = 0.015) and length of hospital stay (LOS; OR = 1.05, CI: 1.02-1.08, p = 0.002). Infection, wound size, ISS, and preoperative hemoglobin/hematocrit were independently associated with increased LOS (p < 0.05) but not with major complications. CONCLUSION: The number of units of PRBCs given perioperatively was the only variable independently associated with major complications on multivariate analysis and was one of many variables associated with increased LOS. These findings suggest the usage of restrictive transfusion protocols in trauma patients requiring LE reconstruction.

Cross-institutional Virtual Mock Oral Examination: A New Paradigm?

Mock oral examinations (MOEs) are shown to be valuable in preparation for national board oral examinations. Although traditionally conducted in-person, improved technological advances have supported exploring virtual alternatives. Furthermore, the cornoavirus disease 2019 pandemic has necessitated virtual learning. We hypothesized that the virtual platform would improve and expand the MOE experience to include collaborative institutions while approximating a board examination environment. Methods: Sixteen senior plastic surgery residents and 14 faculty from three separate programs participated in a cross-institutional virtual MOE. Over a single day, each trainee was evaluated by two faculty from a separate institution on six scenarios, including digitally interactive photographs. Immediate postexamination debriefing with feedback was performed. All participants were subsequently invited to complete an anonymous survey regarding MOE experience, accuracy, and stress level, with responses graded on a Likert scale (1-5). Results: Twenty-three participants completed the survey, with 87% having prior MOE experience; however, only 26.1% of participants had virtual MOE experience. Most found the virtual platform more convenient (4.18 + 1.18; 5-far more convenient, 1-far less convenient) and less stressful (2.32 + 0.65; 5-far more stressful, 1-far less stressful) than in-person. All participants found the examination fair, and participants found the examination valuable (4.65 + 0.57) in preparing trainees for the American Board of Plastic Surgery oral examination. Conclusions: The majority of participants found the virtual MOE experience valuable and comparable to in-person. These results reinforce that a virtual MOE provides an acceptable alternative with greater convenience and improved cross-institutional collaborative efforts.

Physician Loans: Understanding and Overcoming an Epidemic.

BACKGROUND: Plastic surgeons face increasing financial pressure from debt, largely in two forms: education and practice loans. The authors aim to provide perspective and context when assessing their individual situations while providing straightforward and evidence-based guidance for plastic surgeons to effectively manage their physician loan burden. METHODS: Data from the Association of American Medical Colleges Medical School Graduation Questionnaire were used and analyzed. Resources for physician loans (both public and private) were also explored to determine options available to physicians. RESULTS: By graduation, the education debt for the average medical graduate is roughly $200,000. Medical school debt makes up the majority of education debt, with the 4-year cost of attendance for the class of 2020 at over $275,000 for over half of all medical schools. Over the past decade, the median cost of attendance has grown at a faster rate than median debt levels at a rate double that of inflation. CONCLUSIONS: The two major forms of debt facing plastic surgeons are educational and practice debt. Through financial education and the enactment of sound financial strategies, these debts can be effectively managed, improving physician well-being and bringing the focus more squarely back on patient care.