New Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Atrial Fibrillation After Early Postoperative Period in Patients With Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of novel nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) to prevent stroke is well assessed, but NOACs use in AF that occurs after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR) is not endorsed. This retrospective real-world study evaluated the efficacy and safety of NOACs prescribed no earlier than 4 months after AVR as an alternative to warfarin in patients with AF. METHODS: We pooled 1032 patients from the databases of 5 centers. Ischemic/embolic events and major bleeding rates were compared between 340 patients assuming NOACs and 692 prescribed warfarin. Propensity score matching was performed to avoid the bias between groups. RESULTS: The NOACs vs warfarin embolic/ischemic rate was 13.5% (46 of 340) vs 22.7% (157 of 692), respectively, (hazard ratio [HR], 0.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37-0.75; P < .001), and the incidence rate was 3.7% vs 6.9% patients/year, respectively (log-rank test P = .009). The major bleeding rate was 7.3% (25 of 340) vs 13% (90 of 692) (HR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.33-0.84; P = .007), and the incidence rate was 2% vs 4% patients/year (log-rank test P = .002.) After propensity score matching, the NOACs vs warfarin embolic/ischemic rate was 13.1% (42 of 321) vs 21.8% (70 of 321) (HR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9; P = .02), and the incidence rate was 4.1% vs 6.7% patients/year (log rank test P = .01). The major bleeding rate was 7.8% (25 of /321) vs 13.7% (44 of 321) (HR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.31-0.86; P = .01), and the incidence rate was 2.4% vs 4.2% patients/year (log-rank P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: In a real-word study, NOACs use overcomes the indications provided by guidelines. This study evidenced that NOACs use in patients who developed AF after bioprosthetic AVR was more effective in prevention of thromboembolism and safe in reduction of major bleeding events compared with warfarin.

Status of coronary disease and results from early endovascular aneurysm repair after preventive percutaneous coronary revascularization.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of coronary artery disease (CAD) is high in patients with an aortic aneurysm but preoperative routine coronary angiography and preventive coronary revascularization are not recommended to reduce cardiac events in patients with severe CAD. AIM: This study evaluated the safeness and efficacy of preventive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with severe CAD scheduled for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: All patients with descending thoracic aneurysm (DTA) or abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) scheduled for EVAR underwent preliminary coronary angiography. Based on coronary angiography results, 917 patients (40.7%) had significant CAD and were treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; CAD group) and 1337 patients (59.3%) were without or with mild/moderate CAD and were considered as controls (no-CAD group). To evaluate the safeness and efficacy of preventive PCI in patients with severe CAD undergoing EVAR, groups were compared for hospital and 12-month cardiac adverse events. RESULTS: CAD was present in 1210 patients (53.6%): significant in 917 patients (38%) and mild to moderate in 293 patients (5.3%). Hospital and 12-month cardiac events occurred in 15 (1.6%) and 13 (1.4%) CAD group patients and in 9 (0.7%) and 8 (0.4%) no-CAD group patients (p = .05 and p = .08), respectively. Hospital and 12-month cardiac deaths occurred in 3 (0.3%) and 2 (0.2%) CAD group patients and in 3 (0.2%) and 2 (0.2%) no-CAD group patients (p = .9 and p = .9), respectively. CONCLUSION: The strategy to treat severe CAD preoperatively by PCI and early subsequent EVAR brings a similar outcome to that in patients without or with mild/moderate CAD.

Safety of aortic aneurysm repair 8 weeks after percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary artery disease: a cohort study.

Guidelines advice against dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) discontinuation less than 12 months after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents (DES-PCI). However, any delay of necessary surgery in patients with descending thoracic (DTA) or abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), treated by DES-PCI, increases the risk of aneurysm rupture/dissection. We evaluated the safety of 8-week waiting time between DES-PCI and endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). 1152 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) needing elective DTA or AAA repair were enrolled and divided into two groups. Group A included 830 patients treated by DES-PCI for significant CAD who underwent surgery 8 weeks after implantation. Group B included 322 patients treated by DES-PCI at least 6 months before with no residual significant CAD and treated by elective EVAR. Groups were compared according to a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, cerebrovascular events and bleeding. No aneurysm rupture/dissection occurred while waiting for surgery. Hospital averse events occurred in 6.2% (52/830) group A patients versus 6.5% (21/322) group B patients (p = 0.8). Mortality was 0.7% (6/830) in group A and 0.9% (3/322) in group B (p = 0.7). Multivariate predictors of events were triple vessel DES-PCI (p < 0.001), > 3 stents implanted (p < 0.001), early-generation stents (p < 0.001), diabetes insulin requiring (p = 0.01), stent diameter < 3.0 mm (p = 0.009) and total stented length > 30 mm (p = 0.02). Eight weeks of waiting after DES-PCI in addition to an adequate management of DAPT were safe in terms of cardiac morbidity and bleeding complications. No aneurysm rupture occurred in the interval before surgery.

Endovascular Treatment of Distal Aortic Arch Aneurysm Associated with Coarctation of Aorta in a Jehovah's Witness.

Late aneurysm formation in the proximal aorta or distal aortic arch is a recognized sequela of untreated stenosis of the aortic isthmus and is associated with substantial risk of aortic rupture. We describe the case of a 44-year-old man with untreated coarctation of the aorta who presented with a prestenotic dissecting thoracic aortic aneurysm. He declined surgery because he was a Jehovah's Witness. Instead, we performed emergency endovascular aortic repair in which 2 stent-grafts were placed in the descending aorta. Our experience suggests that this procedure is a useful and safe alternative to open surgery in patients who have aneurysms associated with coarctation of the aorta.

Impact of different values of prosthesis-patient mismatch on outcome in male patients with aortic valve replacement.

AIMS: Mortality and left ventricular mass (LVM) recovery/regression after aortic valve replacement in patients with prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) is controversial. This study evaluated the impact of different values of indexed effective orifice area (EOAi) in male patients on mortality and indexed LVM (ILVM) recovery/regression. METHOD: The study recruited 376 male patients with and without PPM after aortic valve replacement with different EOAi cut-off values. RESULTS: At EOAi 0.85 cm/m or less, 295 patients had PPM (78.5%). ILVM recovery occurred in 60.5% of no-PPM patients versus 46.1% of patients with PPM (P = 0.003), and ILVM regression was 35 versus 25% (P < 0.001). Time for ILVM regression was shorter in no-PPM group. At EOAi 0.75 cm/m or less, 201 patients had PPM (53.4%). ILVM recovery occurred in 55.4% of no-PPM patients versus 45.2% of patients with PPM (P = 0.06), regression was 32 versus 29% (P = 0.09). Time for ILVM regression was similar between groups. Regardless the cut-off value for PPM definition, mortality was similar. CONCLUSION: LVM recovery/regression, but not mortality, was different at different EOAi. The cut-off value at EOAi 0.75 cm/m or less guaranteed a more balanced patient distribution between groups and the best compromise between specificity and sensitivity.

64-slice multidetector computed tomographic evaluation of arterial conduit patency after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

We set out to evaluate the accuracy of 64-slice multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) in the evaluation of graft patency in 25 unselected patients who underwent off-pump revascularization with arterial conduits. A total of 73 coronary artery bypass grafts were examined by means of 64-slice MDCT. Postoperative clinical outcomes were also evaluated as indicators of early coronary bypass malfunction. Serial data from cardiac-specific biomarkers and from hemodynamic results were obtained in all patients. Two radiologists analyzed the MDCT images and reached consensus.No patients had evidence of postoperative acute myocardial infarction. Transient postoperative reduction of 5% to 8% in left ventricular ejection fraction was detected in 4 patients, independently of elevated biomarker serum levels. A total of 73 conduits were available for the analysis. Two grafts were judged not evaluable because of poor visualization due to irregular heartbeat. The image quality was excellent in all other scanned grafts and anastomoses.We conclude that 64-slice MDCT technology enables accurate and reliable visualization of coronary bypass grafts with arterial conduits. We believe that it can be performed in large populations of postoperative bypass patients as a realistic alternative to coronary angiography.

Effect of rosuvastatin pretreatment on myocardial damage after coronary surgery: a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: Myocardial disease without evidence of myocardial infarction is a frequent complication after cardiac surgery during cardiopulmonary bypass. Statins might be protective, but their efficacy has not been established in randomized trials. METHODS: Two hundred patients undergoing coronary surgery were enrolled. They were randomized to rosuvastatin (20 mg/d, n = 100) or placebo (n = 100) starting 1 week before the operation. Troponin I, myoglobin, creatine kinase-MB mass, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were used as markers of myocardial injury, and their values were determined at baseline and at regular intervals after the operation. Electrocardiography and echocardiography were performed before and after the operation. RESULTS: Myocardial disease was diagnosed when troponin I, myoglobin, and creatine kinase-MB mass values were above the upper normal limit without evidence of electrocardiographic changes, echocardiographic changes, or both. The percentages of marker level increase indicative of myocardial disease were determined in the placebo versus statin groups and were as follows: troponin I, 35% versus 65% (P < .0001); myoglobin, 39% versus 72% (P < .0001); creatine kinase-MB mass, 22% versus 40% (P = .0002). Peak postoperative values of troponin I (0.16 +/- 0.15 vs 0.32 +/- 0.26 ng/mL, P = .0008), myoglobin (72.25 +/- 25 vs 98.31 +/- 31 ng/mL, P < .0001), and creatine kinase-MB mass (3.9 +/- 3.3 vs 9.3 +/- 8.1 ng/mL, P < .0001) were significantly higher in the placebo group. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein values were increased in 58% of pretreated versus 88% of the control patients (15.4 +/- 2.5 vs 17.2 +/- 3.4 mg/L, P < .0001). In high-risk patients myocardial disease was observed more frequently but significantly less in statin-pretreated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Statin pretreatment reduces myocardial damage after coronary surgery and could improve both short- and long-term results.