Navigating the Impact of the Dobbs Decision: Perspectives from Pediatric Surgeons on Reproductive Health Care.

SUMMARY: Nationwide abortion restrictions resulting from the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022) decision have generated confusion and uncertainty among healthcare professionals, with concerns for liability impacting clinical decision-making and outcomes. The impact on pediatric surgery can be seen in prenatal counseling for fetal anomaly cases, counseling for fetal intervention, and recommendations for pregnant children and adolescents who seek termination. It is essential that all physicians and healthcare team members understand the legal implications on their clinical practices, engage with resources and organizations which can help navigate these circumstances, and consider advocating for patients and themselves. Pediatric surgeons must consider the impact of these changing laws on their ability to provide comprehensive and ethical care and counseling to all patients.

Bridging the Knowledge Gap: A Toolkit on Reproductive Rights for Pediatric Surgeons in the Post-Dobbs Era.

BACKGROUND: The ripple effect of the Supreme Court ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization has impacted physicians and patients across numerous medical specialties. In pediatric surgery, the patient population ranges from fetus to the pregnant patient. There is a gap in the knowledge of pediatric surgeons regarding abortion laws and access. This project aims to bridge the gap by creating access to reliable resources which may be used to optimize patient care and support physicians. METHODS: We collaborated with the Reproductive Health Coalition, co-founded by the American Medical Women's Association and Doctors for America, to curate a list of resources beneficial to pediatric surgeons. RESULTS: We created a web-based toolkit with the purpose of providing easily accessible and reliable information on reproductive rights in the United States. We identified up-to-date resources on state-by-state abortion laws, legal resources, patient-centered information on obtaining abortion care, and resources for physicians interested in getting involved in advocacy. CONCLUSION: Pediatric surgery rests at a critical juncture with respect to reproductive rights in the United States. Our toolkit enables users to understand the current climate and identify next steps to advocate for patients and physicians amidst a formidable legal environment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Pathophysiology and Management of Postoperative Ileus in Adults and Neonates: A Review.

Postoperative ileus (POI) is caused by enteric neural dysfunction and inflammatory response to the stress of surgery as well as the effect of anesthetics and opioid pain medications. POI results in prolonged hospital stays, increased medical costs, and diminished enteral nutrition, rendering it a problem worth tackling. Many cellular pathways are implicated in this disease process, creating numerous opportunities for targeted management strategies. There is a gap in the literature in studies exploring neonatal POI pathophysiology and treatment options. It is well known that neonatal immune and enteric nervous systems are immature, and this results in gut physiology which is distinct from adults. Neonates undergoing abdominal surgery face similar surgical stressors and exposure to medications that cause POI in adults. In this review, we aim to summarize the existing adult and neonatal literature on POI pathophysiology and management and explore applications in the neonatal population.

Transversus Abdominis Plane Block VS. Local Wound Infiltration for Elective Minimally Invasive Cholecystectomy in Children: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus local anesthetic wound infiltration (LWI) in pediatric laparoscopic surgery is largely unknown. The objective of this study was to prospectively analyze this in minimally invasive cholecystectomy. We hypothesized that TAP block would be superior to LWI in terms of pain control and post-operative complications. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial between 2017 and 2022 after obtaining Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval. After randomization, patients received a standard amount of ropivacaine via either 1) ultrasound-guided TAP block after general anesthesia induction or 2) local injection at port insertion by the operating surgeon. We collected data including operative time, pain scores, and medication usage post-operatively. We used descriptive statistics to report all endpoints and compared data with t-tests and Fisher's exact tests. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: We enrolled 85 patients (43 LWI, 42 TAP). Mean [standard deviation] age and body mass index (BMI) in the LWI and TAP groups were 14.8 [1.9] and 14.7 [2] years and 29.9 [7.2] and 27.4 [8.2] kilogram/meter2 (kg/m2) respectively. We did not find any significant differences in postoperative opioid use, pain scores, and gastrointestinal symptoms. TAP patients had significantly longer time between anesthesia-start and procedure-start (p < 0.001), although total time under anesthesia was not significantly different (p = 0.540). CONCLUSION: There are no significant differences between equal administration of local anesthetic by TAP block and surgeon administered LWI during minimally invasive cholecystectomy. TYPE OF STUDY: Randomized clinical trial. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.