A circadian-informed lighting intervention accelerates circadian adjustment to a night work schedule in a submarine lighting environment.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Night work has detrimental impacts on sleep and performance, primarily due to misalignment between sleep-wake schedules and underlying circadian rhythms. This study tested whether circadian-informed lighting accelerated circadian phase delay, and thus adjustment to night work, compared to blue-depleted standard lighting under simulated submariner work conditions. METHODS: Nineteen healthy sleepers (12 males; mean±SD aged 29 ±10 y) participated in two separate 8-day visits approximately one month apart to receive, in random order, circadian-informed lighting (blue-enriched and dim, blue-depleted lighting at specific times) and standard lighting (dim, blue-depleted lighting). After an adaptation night (day 1), salivary dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) assessment was undertaken from 18:00-02:00 on days 2-3. During days 3-7, participants completed simulated night work from 00:00-08:00 and a sleep period from 10:00-19:00. Post-condition DLMO assessment occurred from 21:00-13:00 on days 7-8. Ingestible capsules continuously sampled temperature to estimate daily core body temperature minimum (Tmin) time. Tmin and DLMO circadian delays were compared between conditions using mixed effects models. RESULTS: There were significant condition-by-day interactions in Tmin and DLMO delays (both p<0.001). After four simulated night shifts, circadian-informed lighting produced a mean [95%CI] 4.3 [3.3 to 5.4] h greater delay in Tmin timing and a 4.2 [3 to 5.6] h greater delay in DLMO timing compared to standard lighting. CONCLUSIONS: Circadian-informed lighting accelerates adjustment to shiftwork in a simulated submariner work environment. Circadian lighting interventions warrant consideration in any dimly lit and blue-depleted work environments where circadian adjustment is relevant to help enhance human performance, safety, and health.

Tripolar concentric ring electrodes for capturing localised electroencephalography signals during sleep.

By design, tripolar concentric ring electrodes (TCRE) provide more focal brain activity signals than conventional electroencephalography (EEG) electrodes placed further apart. This study compared spectral characteristics and rates of data loss to noisy epochs with TCRE versus conventional EEG signals recorded during sleep. A total of 20 healthy sleepers (12 females; mean [standard deviation] age 27.8 [9.6] years) underwent a 9-h sleep study. Participants were set up for polysomnography recording with TCRE to assess brain activity from 18 sites and conventional electrodes for EEG, eyes, and muscle movement. A fast Fourier transform using multitaper-based estimation was applied in 5-s epochs to scored sleep. Odds ratios with Bonferroni-adjusted 95% confidence intervals were calculated to determine the proportional differences in the number of noisy epochs between electrode types. Relative power was compared in frequency bands throughout sleep. Linear mixed models showed significant main effects of signal type (p < 0.001) and sleep stage (p < 0.001) on relative spectral power in each power band, with lower relative spectral power across all stages in TCRE versus EEG in alpha, beta, sigma, and theta activity, and greater delta power in all stages. Scalp topography plots showed distinct beta activation in the right parietal lobe with TCRE versus EEG. EEG showed higher rates of noisy epochs compared to TCRE (1.3% versus 0.8%, p < 0.001). TCRE signals showed marked differences in brain activity compared to EEG, consistent with more focal measurements and region-specific differences during sleep. TCRE may be useful for evaluating regional differences in brain activity with reduced muscle artefact compared to conventional EEG.

Regular snoring is associated with uncontrolled hypertension.

Snoring may be a risk factor for cardiovascular disease independent of other co-morbidities. However, most prior studies have relied on subjective, self-report, snoring evaluation. This study assessed snoring prevalence objectively over multiple months using in-home monitoring technology, and its association with hypertension prevalence. In this study, 12,287 participants were monitored nightly for approximately six months using under-the-mattress sensor technology to estimate the average percentage of sleep time spent snoring per night and the estimated apnea-hypopnea index (eAHI). Blood pressure cuff measurements from multiple daytime assessments were averaged to define uncontrolled hypertension based on mean systolic blood pressure≥140 mmHg and/or a mean diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg. Associations between snoring and uncontrolled hypertension were examined using logistic regressions controlled for age, body mass index, sex, and eAHI. Participants were middle-aged (mean ± SD; 50 ± 12 y) and most were male (88%). There were 2467 cases (20%) with uncontrolled hypertension. Approximately 29, 14 and 7% of the study population snored for an average of >10, 20, and 30% per night, respectively. A higher proportion of time spent snoring (75th vs. 5th; 12% vs. 0.04%) was associated with a ~1.9-fold increase (OR [95%CI]; 1.87 [1.63, 2.15]) in uncontrolled hypertension independent of sleep apnea. Multi-night objective snoring assessments and repeat daytime blood pressure recordings in a large global consumer sample, indicate that snoring is common and positively associated with hypertension. These findings highlight the potential clinical utility of simple, objective, and noninvasive methods to detect snoring and its potential adverse health consequences.

Estimating vigilance from the pre-work shift sleep using an under-mattress sleep sensor.

Predicting vigilance impairment in high-risk shift work occupations is critical to help to reduce workplace errors and accidents. Current methods rely on multi-night, often manually entered, sleep data. This study developed a machine learning model for predicting vigilance errors based on a single prior sleep period, derived from an under-mattress sensor. Twenty-four healthy volunteers (mean [SD] age = 27.6 [9.5] years, 12 male) attended the laboratory on two separate occasions, 1 month apart, to compare wake performance and sleep under two different lighting conditions. Each condition occurred over an 8 day protocol comprising a baseline sleep opportunity from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m., a 27 h wake period, then daytime sleep opportunities from 10 a.m. to 7 p.m. on days 3-7. From 12 a.m. to 8 a.m. on each of days 4-7, participants completed simulated night shifts that included six 10 min psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) trials per shift. Sleep was assessed using an under-mattress sensor. Using extra-trees machine learning models, PVT performance (reaction times <500 ms, reaction, and lapses) during each night shift was predicted based on the preceding daytime sleep. The final extra-trees model demonstrated moderate accuracy for predicting PVT performance, with standard errors (RMSE) of 19.9 ms (reaction time, 359 [41.6]ms), 0.42 reactions/s (reaction speed, 2.5 [0.6] reactions/s), and 7.2 (lapses, 10.5 [12.3]). The model also correctly classified 84% of trials containing ≥5 lapses (Matthews correlation coefficient = 0.59, F1 = 0.83). Model performance is comparable to current fatigue prediction models that rely upon self-report or manually entered data. This efficient approach may help to manage fatigue and safety in non-standard work schedules.

Are we getting enough sleep? Frequent irregular sleep found in an analysis of over 11 million nights of objective in-home sleep data.

OBJECTIVES: Evidence-based guidelines recommend that adults should sleep 7-9 h/night for optimal health and function. This study used noninvasive, multinight, objective sleep monitoring to determine average sleep duration and sleep duration variability in a large global community sample, and how often participants met the recommended sleep duration range. METHODS: Data were analyzed from registered users of the Withings under-mattress Sleep Analyzer (predominantly located in Europe and North America) who had ≥28 nights of sleep recordings, averaging ≥4 per week. Sleep durations (the average and standard deviation) were assessed across a ∼9-month period. Associations between age groups, sex, and sleep duration were assessed using linear and logistic regressions, and proportions of participants within (7-9 hours) or outside (<7 hours or >9 hours) the recommended sleep duration range were calculated. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 67,254 adults (52,523 males, 14,731 females; aged mean ± SD 50 ± 12 years). About 30% of adults demonstrated an average sleep duration outside the recommended 7-9 h/night. Even in participants with an average sleep duration within 7-9 hours, about 40% of nights were outside this range. Only 15% of participants slept between 7 and 9 hours for at least 5 nights per week. Female participants had significantly longer sleep durations than male participants, and middle-aged participants had shorter sleep durations than younger or older participants. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that a considerable proportion of adults are not regularly sleeping the recommended 7-9 h/night. Even among those who do, irregular sleep is prevalent. These novel data raise several important questions regarding sleep requirements and the need for improved sleep health policy and advocacy.

Multi-night measurement for diagnosis and simplified monitoring of obstructive sleep apnoea.

Substantial night-to-night variability in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) severity has raised misdiagnosis and misdirected treatment concerns with the current prevailing single-night diagnostic approach. In-home, multi-night sleep monitoring technology may provide a feasible complimentary diagnostic pathway to improve both the speed and accuracy of OSA diagnosis and monitor treatment efficacy. This review describes the latest evidence on night-to-night variability in OSA severity, and its impact on OSA diagnostic misclassification. Emerging evidence for the potential impact of night-to-night variability in OSA severity to influence important health risk outcomes associated with OSA is considered. This review also characterises emerging diagnostic applications of wearable and non-wearable technologies that may provide an alternative, or complimentary, approach to traditional OSA diagnostic pathways. The required evidence to translate these devices into clinical care is also discussed. Appropriately sized randomised controlled trials are needed to determine the most appropriate and effective technologies for OSA diagnosis, as well as the optimal number of nights needed for accurate diagnosis and management. Potential risks versus benefits, patient perspectives, and cost-effectiveness of these novel approaches should be carefully considered in future trials.

Emerging applications of objective sleep assessments towards the improved management of insomnia.

Self-reported sleep difficulties are the primary concern associated with diagnosis and treatment of chronic insomnia. This said, in-home sleep monitoring technology in combination with self-reported sleep outcomes may usefully assist with the management of insomnia. The rapid acceleration in consumer sleep technology capabilities together with their growing use by consumers means that the implementation of clinically useful techniques to more precisely diagnose and better treat insomnia are now possible. This review describes emerging techniques which may facilitate better identification and management of insomnia through objective sleep monitoring. Diagnostic techniques covered include insomnia phenotyping, better detection of comorbid sleep disorders, and identification of patients potentially at greatest risk of adverse outcomes. Treatment techniques reviewed include the administration of therapies (e.g., Intensive Sleep Retraining, digital treatment programs), methods to assess and improve treatment adherence, and sleep feedback to address concerns about sleep and sleep loss. Gaps in sleep device capabilities are also discussed, such as the practical assessment of circadian rhythms. Proof-of-concept studies remain needed to test these sleep monitoring-supported techniques in insomnia patient populations, with the goal to progress towards more precise diagnoses and efficacious treatments for individuals with insomnia.

The Good Sleeper Scale-15 items: a questionnaire for the standardised assessment of good sleepers.

Research with 'good sleepers' is ubiquitous, yet there are no standardised criteria to identify a 'good sleeper'. The present study aimed to create and validate a questionnaire for identifying good sleepers for use in research studies known as the Good Sleeper Scale-15 items (GSS-15). Data were derived from a population-based survey of Australian adults (n = 2,044). A total of 23 items were chosen for possible inclusion. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on ~10% of the survey dataset (n = 191) for factor identification and item reduction. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted on the remaining data (n = 1,853) to test model fit. Receiver operating characteristic curves and correlations were conducted to derive cut-off scores and test associations with sleep, daytime functioning, health, and quality-of-life. The EFA identified six factors: 'Sleep Difficulties', 'Timing', 'Duration', 'Regularity', 'Adequacy', and 'Perceived Sleep Problem'. The CFA showed that model fit was high and comparable to other sleep instruments, χ2 (63) = 378.22, p < 0.001, root mean square error of approximation = 0.05, with acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.76). Strong correlations were consistently found between GSS-15 global scores and outcomes, including 'a good night's sleep' (r = 0.7), 'feeling un-refreshed' (r = -0.59), and 'experienced sleepiness' (r = -0.51), p < 0.001. Cut-off scores were derived to categorise individuals likely to be a good sleeper (GSS-15 score ≥40) and those very likely to be a good sleeper (GSS-15 score ≥45). The GSS-15 is a freely available, robust questionnaire that will assist in identifying good sleepers for the purpose of sleep research. Future work will test relationships with other sleep measures in community and clinical samples.