Expanded Access Study of Palbociclib Plus Letrozole for Postmenopausal Women with HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer in Latin America for Whom Letrozole Therapy is Deemed Appropriate.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Palbociclib is a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor that is approved in the United States for the treatment of hormone receptor‒positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor‒2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). The objectives of this expanded access trial were to provide palbociclib in combination with letrozole to patients with HR+/HER2- ABC in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico who were candidates for letrozole therapy before commercial availability of palbociclib, and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of palbociclib plus letrozole. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal women aged ≥ 18 years with HR+/HER2- ABC were eligible to participate in this study. Patients received palbociclib 125 mg once daily (3/1 schedule) and letrozole 2.5 mg once daily (continuous schedule). Safety, objective response rate (ORR), and duration of treatment were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 130 patients were treated with palbociclib plus letrozole (Argentina, n = 33; Brazil, n = 35; Colombia, n = 28; Mexico, n = 34). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade were neutropenia (70.0%), leukopenia (34.6%), anemia (33.8%), decreased neutrophil count (27.7%), and thrombocytopenia (24.6%); 22.3% of patients required a palbociclib dose reduction due to adverse events (AEs). Serious AEs were reported in 32 patients (24.6%). The ORR was 24.8% (95% confidence interval 17.6‒33.2), and the median duration of treatment was 10.6 months (range 0.1‒29.3). CONCLUSION: Palbociclib in combination with letrozole was generally well tolerated with a clinically manageable safety profile; the observed ORR supported treatment benefit in Latin American women with HR+/HER2- ABC. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02600923.

This study was done to learn more about the safety of 2 medicines together for women with advanced breast cancer after menopause. All 130 women in the study had the most common kind of breast cancer and were from Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico. Everyone took 2 oral medicines called palbociclib and letrozole during the study. The researchers looked for any side effects experienced by the women while taking these medicines together. Another goal of the study was to see how well the treatment worked. Blood tests showed 70.0% of women had a side effect where they had a lower number of a type of white blood cell called a neutrophil. In total, 34.6% of women had low levels of another white blood cell called a leukocyte. These blood test results can mean a person is more likely to get infections. Serious side effects were experienced by 24.6% of the women, which meant these were life-threatening, caused lasting problems, or they needed hospital care. To cope with their side effects, 22.3% of the women switched to a lower palbociclib dose; 24.8% of the women had an overall response, which meant they either had a decrease in their tumor size or all cancer signs disappeared from their body. The most common length of time in the study was 10.6 months and the longest time was 29.3 months. The results of this study support using palbociclib plus letrozole to treat women who live in Latin America with advanced breast cancer after menopause.

Results of a survey study on health professionals' perceptions of tumor boards in Brazil.

Background: Tumor boards (TB) are synonymous with quality of care but have been occasionally misunderstood and underutilized. This survey aimed to evaluate health professionals' perceptions of TBs in Brazil. Materials & methods: The survey was sent electronically. Results: Of 206 respondents, 67.8% attended TBs at least once and 82.4% dedicated at least 1 h weekly to them; 64.2% preferred a more &educational' model over case discussions only; 63.1% had institutional leadership capable of promoting multidisciplinarity; 21.1 and 32.7% of the physicians and nonphysicians, respectively, felt intimidated to express their opinions; 91.6% believed that TBs improve cancer outcomes. Postpandemic, 52.7% preferred a hybrid (virtual/face-to-face) model. Conclusion: This study provides a glimpse of the reality of TBs in Brazil, with potential implications for clinical practice.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cancer Staging: An Analysis of Patients With Breast Cancer From a Community Practice in Brazil.

PURPOSE: A nationwide lockdown was enforced in Brazil starting in March 2020 because of the COVID-19 pandemic when cancer screening activities were reduced. In this study, we evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer (BC) diagnosis. METHODS: We extracted data from the medical records of patients age older than 18 years who were diagnosed with BC and started treatment or follow-up in private oncology institutions in Brazil between 2018 and 2021. The primary objective was to compare the stage distribution during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021) with a historical prepandemic control cohort (2018-2019). Early BC was defined as stage I-II and advanced disease as stage IV. RESULTS: We collected data for 11,753 patients with an initial diagnosis of BC, with 6,493 patients in the pandemic (2020-2021) and 5,260 patients in the prepandemic period (2018-2019). We observed a lower prevalence of early-stage BC (63.6% v 68.4%) and a higher prevalence of advanced-stage BC (16.9 v 12.7%), after the onset of the pandemic (both P < .01). This pattern was similar for both estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive tumors: significantly decreased in the early stage from 69% to 67% and 68% to 58%, respectively, and a considerable increase in advanced-stage disease from 13% to 15% and 13% to 20%, respectively. For triple-negative BC, there was a significantly higher percentage of patients with advanced-stage disease during the pandemic (17% v 11%). Overall, age 50 years or older and postmenopausal status were associated with a greater risk of advanced stage at diagnosis during the pandemic period. CONCLUSION: We observed a substantial increase in the number of cases of advanced-stage BC in Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Telehealth, Social Media, Patient Empowerment, and Physician Burnout: Seeking Middle Ground.

The digital revolution is an ongoing process that has nevertheless profoundly affected century-old medical practice. Digitalization has many facets, ranging from telehealth to social media and even new instant communication devices, each of which affect both patients' and physicians' realities. Although the benefits of developments such as telehealth and novel applications of social media to medicine are more easily perceived by all stakeholders, they still have their own hurdles and risks, such as coldness and impersonal treatment in telehealth, and misinformation on social media. The widespread digitalization of health records has greatly facilitated patient access to health information, becoming a major patient empowerment tool; however, some forms of unrestricted access, such as to test results-in particular, prior to consultations-have unclear benefits to patients with cancer and have also become a hurdle for care teams. In addition, the advent of instant messaging, which is revolutionizing personal communication in many cultures, is gradually affecting patient-physician communication and, combined with unrestricted patient access to test results, is creating new challenges for physicians. How these transformations are affecting patients themselves and physicians' well-being and mental health are matters addressed in this text. Last, to address potential biases in an article written by two oncologists, and in line with this year's ASCO presidential theme of including a diversity of voices, we decided to give voice to patients with cancer by collecting the opinions of high-profile patient advocates about the controversial topics addressed in this text.

Breast Cancer Treatment Delay in SafetyNet Health Systems, Houston Versus Southeast Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer outcomes among patients who use safety-net hospitals in the highly populated Harris County, Texas and Southeast Brazil are poor. It is unknown whether treatment delay contributes to these outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with non-metastatic breast cancer diagnosed between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2011 at Harris Health Texas and Unicamp's Women's Hospital, Barretos Hospital, and Brazilian National Institute of Cancer, Brazil. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to evaluate association of time to treatment and risk of recurrence (ROR) or death. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred ninety-one patients were included. Women in Brazil were more frequently diagnosed with stage III disease (32.3% vs. 21.1% Texas; P = .002). Majority of patients in both populations had symptom-detected disease (63% in Brazil vs. 59% in Texas). Recurrence within 5 years from diagnosis was similar 21% versus 23%. Median time from diagnosis to first treatment defined as either systemic therapy (chemotherapy or endocrine therapy) or surgery, were comparable, 9.9 weeks versus 9.4 weeks. Treatment delay was not associated with increased ROR or death. Higher stage at diagnosis was associated with both increased ROR and death. CONCLUSION: Time from symptoms to treatment was considerably long in both populations. Treatment delay did not affect outcomes. IMPACT: Access to timely screening and diagnosis of breast cancer are priorities in these populations.

Pre-treatment MRI tumor features and post-treatment mammographic findings: may they contribute to refining the prediction of pathologic complete response in post-neoadjuvant breast cancer patients with radiologic complete response on MRI?

PURPOSE: Radiologic complete response (rCR) in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) does not necessarily correlate with pathologic complete response (pCR), a marker traditionally associated with better outcomes. We sought to verify if data extracted from two important steps of the imaging workup (tumor features at pre-treatment MRI and post-treatment mammographic findings) might assist in refining the prediction of pCR in post-NAC patients showing rCR. METHODS: A total of 115 post-NAC women with rCR on MRI (2010-2016) were retrospectively assessed. Pre-treatment MRI (lesion morphology, size, and distribution) and post-treatment mammographic findings (calcification, asymmetry, mass, architectural distortion) were assessed, as well as clinical and molecular variables. Bivariate and multivariate analyses evaluated correlation between such variables and pCR. Post-NAC mammographic findings and their correlation with ductal in situ carcinoma (DCIS) were evaluated using Pearson's correlation. RESULTS: Tumor distribution at pre-treatment MRI was the only significant predictive imaging feature on multivariate analysis, with multicentric lesions having lower odds of pCR (p = 0.035). There was no significant association between tumor size and morphology with pCR. Mammographic residual calcifications were associated with DCIS (p = 0.009). The receptor subtype remained as a significant predictor, with HR-HER2 + and triple-negative status demonstrating higher odds of pCR on multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Multicentric lesions on pre-NAC MRI were associated with a lower chance of pCR in post-NAC rCR patients. The receptor subtype remained a reliable predictor of pCR. Residual mammographic calcifications correlated with higher odds of malignancy, making the correlation between mammography and MRI essential for surgical planning. Key Points • The presence of a multicentric lesion on pre-NAC MRI, even though the patient reaches a radiologic complete response on MRI, is associated with a lower chance of pCR. • Molecular status of the tumor remained the only significant predictor of pathologic complete response in such patients in the present study. • Post-neoadjuvant residual calcifications found on mammography were related to higher odds of residual malignancy, making the correlation between mammography and MRI essential for surgical planning.

Implementing multidisciplinary tumor boards in oncology: a narrative review.

The healthcare industry compares unfavorably with other ultra-safe industries such as aviation and nuclear power plants, which address complexity by reducing the vulnerability of a single person and promoting teams and strong systems. A multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) is an evidence-based organizational approach to implementing a more effective concept in oncology practice. Studies addressing the correlation between MTBs and cancer outcomes show promising results, and other potential benefits are also addressed. The objectives of this article are to define and characterize MTBs in modern oncology practice, review the current literature on MTBs effectiveness and address challenges to the implementation and maintenance of MTBs. In this commentary-type narrative review, the authors present their opinions and, whenever possible, substantiate recommendations by citing supportive literature.

Lay abstract Compared with other ultra-safe industries such as aviation and nuclear power plants, the healthcare industry operates with lower safety standards. Multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) are regular meetings of various specialist doctors and other health professionals involved in cancer care to discuss cases of patients with cancer. MTBs are considered valuable tools to promote the quality of care in oncology by reducing the vulnerability of a single person and promoting teams and strong systems. Studies have shown that MTBs correlate with better treatment results, and other potential benefits are also addressed. The objectives of this paper are to define and characterize MTBs in modern oncology practice, review the current literature on MTBs and address challenges to the implementation and maintenance of MTBs. The authors substantiate their views with literature citations where possible.

Is Independent Clinical Research Possible in Low- and Middle-Income Countries? A Roadmap to Address Persistent and New Barriers and Challenges.

Cancer is an increasing and significant problem for both high- and low- and middle-income countries. Basic, translational, and clinical research efforts have been instrumental in generating the outstanding improvements we have witnessed over the last few decades, answering important questions, and improving patient outcomes. Arguably, a substantial portion of currently ongoing research is sponsored by the pharmaceutical industy and specifically addresses questions under industry interests, most of which apply to high-income countries, leaving behind problems related to the much larger and underserved population of patients with cancer in low- and middle-income countries. In this scenario, discussing independent academic research is an important challenge, particularly for these countries. Although different countries and institutions face different problems while establishing independent research agendas, some generalizable barriers can be identified. A solid regulatory and ethical framework, a strong and sustainable technical supporting infrastructure, and motivated and experienced investigators are all paramount to build a viable and productive academic research program. Securing funding for research, although not the only hurdle, is certainly one of the most basic hurdles to overcome. Noticeably, and as an added impediment, public and governmental support for cancer research has been decreasing in high-income countries and is almost nonexistent in the rest of the world. We propose an initial careful diagnostic assessment of the research resource scenario of each institution/country and adjustment of the strategic development plan according to four different research resource restriction levels. Although not necessarily applicable to all situations, this model can be helpful if adjusted to each local or regional situation.

Integrating Adjuvant Radiation with Post-Neoadjuvant Therapies in Early Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Because of the strong prognostic value of pathologic complete response (pCR) in early breast cancer (EBC), patients who fail to achieve this outcome have increasingly been eligible to a new treatment modality, namely post-neoadjuvant systemic therapy (PNT). However, adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) retains a crucial role in EBC, and also needs to be timely administered to patients. To address how modern PNT optimally integrates with adjuvant RT is therefore the purpose of this review. RECENT FINDINGS: How PNT administration optimally integrates with adjuvant RT has varied depending on the type of systemic therapy employed. The introduction of novel "targeted" agents has created new challenges, as for many of them limited information is available on the feasibility of concurrent systemic and RT administration or their optimal sequencing. PNT and RT are both of utmost importance to the management of EBC and need to be timely and safely administered to patients. The optimal strategy to integrate these modalities may vary according to the type of PNT agent and other factors.

The impact on clinical outcomes of post-operative radiation therapy delay after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: A multicentric international study.

INTRODUCTION: Radiation therapy (RT) is frequently used for post-operative treatment in breast cancer (BC) patients who received preoperative systemic therapy (PST) and surgery. Nevertheless, the optimal timing to start RT is unclear. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from BC patients who underwent chemotherapy as PST, breast surgery and RT at 3 Institutions in Brazil and Canada from 2008 to 2014 were evaluated. Patients were classified into three groups regarding to the time to initiation of RT after surgery: <8 weeks, 8-16 weeks and >16 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 1029 women were included, most of them (59.1%; N = 608) had clinical stage III. One hundred and forty-one patients initiated RT within 8 weeks, 663 between 8 and 16 weeks and 225 beyond 16 weeks from surgery. With a median follow-up of 32 months, no differences in disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) were observed of time to indicated RT (<8 weeks versus 8-16 weeks versus >16 weeks). However, in luminal subtype patients (46.5%; N = 478), initiation of RT up to 8 weeks after surgery was associated with better LRRFS (<8 weeks versus >16 weeks: HR 0.22; 95%CI 0.05-0.86; p = 0.03), with a tendency to a better DFS (<8 weeks versus >16 weeks: HR 0.50; 95%CI 0.25-1.00). CONCLUSION: RT initiated up to 8 weeks after surgery was related to better LRRFS in luminal BC patients who underwent PST. Our results suggest that early start of RT is important for these patients.

The impact of sociodemographic factors and health insurance coverage in the diagnosis and clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer in Brazil: AMAZONA III study (GBECAM 0115).

PURPOSE: In Brazil, the available cancer registries are deficient in number and quality and, hence, little information is known regarding sociodemographic, clinicopathological characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of breast cancer (BC) patients. We performed the AMAZONA III/ GBECAM 0115 study and in this analysis, we describe patients' characteristics at diagnosis and their association with health insurance type. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study developed in 23 sites in Brazil including women with newly diagnosed invasive BC from January 2016 to March 2018. In order to compare healthcare insurance type, we considered patients who were treated under the Brazilian public health system as publicly insured, and women who had private insurance or paid for their treatment as privately insured. RESULTS: A total of 2950 patients were included in the study. Median age at diagnosis was 53.9 years; 63.1% were publicly insured. The majority of patients (68.6%) had stage II-III breast cancer and ductal carcinoma histology (80.9%). The most common breast cancer subtype was luminal A-like (48.0%) followed by luminal B-HER2 positive-like (17.0%) and triple-negative (15.6%). Luminal A was more frequent in private (53.7% vs. 44.2%, p < .0001) than public, whereas Luminal B HER2-positive (19.2% vs. 14.2%, p = 0.0012) and HER2-positive (8.8% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.0009) were more common in patients with public health system coverage. Only 34% of patients were diagnosed by screening exams. Privately insured patients were more frequently diagnosed with stage I disease when compared to publicly insured patients; publicly insured patients had more stage III (33.5% vs. 14.7%; p-value < 0.0001) disease than privately insured ones. Breast cancer was detected by symptoms more frequently in publicly than in privately insured patients (74.2% vs 25.8%, respectively; p-value < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with public health coverage were diagnosed with symptomatic disease, later stages and more aggressive subtypes when compared to privately insured patients.

Cross-Cultural Validity Study of a Medical Education Leadership Competencies Instrument in Latin American Physicians: A Multinational Study.

PURPOSE: Physicians rarely receive formal training in leadership skills. Çitaku and colleagues have identified a set of leadership competencies (LCs) providing validity evidence in North American (NA) and European Union (EU) medical education institutions. We aim to apply this same survey to a sample of Latin American (LA) medical leaders from the oncology community and related areas, compare the results with those of the previous survey, and perform subgroup analyses within the LA cohort. METHODS: The survey was sent to nearly 8,000 physicians of participating professional organizations. In addition to the 63 questions, we also collected data on the type of institution, country, specialty, sex, age, years of experience in oncology, and leadership position. RESULTS: The 217 LA respondents placed the highest value on task management competencies (91.37% reported these as important or very important v 87.0% of NA/EU respondents; P < .0001), followed by self-management (87.45% of LA respondents v 87.55% of NA/EU respondents; P = not significant [NS]), social responsibility (86.83% of LA respondents v 87.48% of NA/EU respondents; P = NS), innovation (86.69% of LA respondents v 85.31% of NA/EU respondents; P = NS), and leading others (83.31% of LA respondents v 84.71% of NA/EU respondents; P = NS). Social responsibility, which was first in importance in the NA/EU survey, was only third in the LA survey. Subgroup analyses showed significant variations in the ratings of specific LCs within the LA population. CONCLUSION: LCs valued by LA leaders somewhat differ from those valued by their NA and EU counterparts, implying that cultural aspects might influence the perception of desired LCs. We also detected variations in the responses within the LA population. Our data indicate that current physician leadership training programs should be tailored to suit specific needs and cultural aspects of each region. Further validity studies of this instrument with other samples and cultures are warranted.