Ocriplasmin treatment for vitreomacular traction in real life: can the indication spectrum be expanded?

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal ocriplasmin for the resolution of vitreomacular traction (VMT) with or without a full thickness macular hole (FTMH) in the clinical setting and to assess whether the indication spectrum of this treatment modality can be expanded beyond that of the MIVI-TRUST trials. METHODS: The records of patients with VMT with or without FTMH, who were treated with intravitreal ocriplasmin were reviewed. Patients were divided in two groups. In the first group, VMT with or without FTMH was present without any other macular pathology. In the second group, VMT with or without FTMH occurred alongside of other macular disease including age-related macular degeneration, diabetic maculopathy and post-operative pseudophakic cystoid macular edema. RESULTS: Release of the VMT was achieved in 12/20 patients (12/20 eyes) of the first group. 16 eyes in this group met 3 or more criteria known to be associated with favorable prognosis after intravitreal ocriplasmin treatment. No cases of release of the VMT were observed in the second group, which included 15 patients (15 eyes). Significant improvement of visual acuity and reduction of the central macular thickness was observed only in the subgroup of eyes which responded to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant macular pathology was a significant factor for treatment failure and we suggest that ocriplasmin should be regarded with caution in these cases. Careful patient selection for treatment with ocriplasmin using specific criteria in the clinical setting can provide superior results to those reported in the MIVI-TRUST trials.

Outcome of intravitreal dexamethasone implant for the treatment of ranibizumab-resistant macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.

To assess the effect of intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex) for the treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) resistant to repeated intravitreal ranibizumab injection. Retrospective review of 11 patients (11 eyes) with ranibizumab-resistant macular edema secondary to RVO. Macular edema was considered refractory to ranibizumab if no change of the pattern of macular fluid on optical coherence tomography and no change of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was observed after at least three consecutive monthly injections, excluding the loading dose. A single Ozurdex injection was performed and BCVA and central foveal thickness (CFT) were reviewed 2, 3, and 6 months after treatment. Mean BCVA improved significantly from 0.51 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (log MAR) at baseline to 0.3 log MAR (p = 0.03) at 2 months and 0.29 log MAR (p = 0.003) at 3 months. There was no significant difference in the BCVA between baseline at 6 months (p = 0.62). Mean CFT reduced significantly from 538 µm at baseline to 281 µm at 2 months (p = 0.00003), 281 µm at 3 months (p = 0.00003), and 445 µm at 6 months (p = 0.03). Treatment with Ozurdex results in improvement of BCVA and reduction of CFT in patients with ranibizumab refractory macular edema due to RVO at 3 months. However, it seems that the visual acuity gain may not last up to 6 months, so that a re-injection before this time point could be considered.

20 g PPV with indocyanine green-assisted ILM peeling versus 23 g PPV with brilliant blue G-assisted ILM peeling for epiretinal membrane.

To compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of 20 gauge (g) pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with indocyanine green (ICG)-assisted internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and 23 g PPV with brilliant blue G (BBG)-assisted ILM peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM). 38 eyes of 38 patients with idiopathic ERM were included. They were divided in two groups: group 1 (18 eyes) underwent 20 g PPV with ICG-assisted ILM peeling and group 2 (20 eyes) 23 g PPV with BBG-assisted ILM peeling. Postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were compared. Average BCVA in group 1 improved significantly from 0.60 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (log MAR) at baseline to 0.3 log MAR postoperatively. Average BCVA in group 2 improved significantly from 0.60 log MAR at baseline to 0.3 log MAR postoperatively. Mean CMT reduced significantly from 473 to 375 µm in group 1 and from 486 to 396 µm in group 2. There were no significant differences in the BCVA and CMT between the groups. Both surgical methods appeared to be safe and provided similar anatomical and visual outcomes.

Two week, OCT-based follow-up as guidance for retreatment with ranibizumab for CNV apparently refractory to therapy.

PURPOSE: To assess the value of 2-week optical coherence tomography (OCT) follow-up for re-treatment decision-making in patients receiving monthly ranibizumab injections for choroidal neovascular membrane (CNV), which was apparently refractory to treatment. METHODS: A total of 25 eyes of 25 consecutive patients with refractory CNV were included. Patients were classified as having refractory disease if no visual acuity (VA) change and no change in the pattern of macular fluid was noticed on OCT after at least 3 consecutive monthly injections, excluding the loading doses. Repeat injection was given and reassessment with VA and OCT was undertaken at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Complete resolution or marked reduction of macular fluid was noted in 19 patients at 2 weeks (responders). In 18 responders, the fluid increased on 4- and persisted on 8- and 12-week follow-ups, so that further injections were given at these time points. In 6 patients, no significant change was noted at 2 weeks (nonresponders). In all of them, VA and OCT were stable on 4-, 8-, and 12-week follow-ups, without further injections. CONCLUSIONS: As some patients are responding for at least part of the month, injections may be worth continuing or possibly more frequent injections, tailored to the individual's response, may need to be considered. Alternative therapies such as aflibercept may also need to be considered. In nonresponding eyes, other cytokines except for vascular endothelial growth factor are probably involved in the pathogenesis or such cases may have structural damage that will not respond to therapy.

Individualizing treatment and choice of medication in lichen planus: a step by step approach.

Although lichen planus is one of the most common dermatological entities, very few reviews on its management exist in the literature. Standard therapeutic approaches include various topical treatments (including topical corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, vitamin D analogs) and phototherapy modalities, as well as systemic corticosteroids and systemic retinoids. While localized skin lesions are easily managed with standard modalities, generalized forms and in particular involvement of hair follicles, nails and mucosa, as well as eyes are often challenging. This review proposes an evidence-based and differential therapeutic regime, taking into account many new emerging systemic therapies to help clinicians optimize treatment according to the type, extent and severity of the disease. An individual therapeutic ladder has been developed for each location, starting with standard modalities and ranking alternative systemic treatments (mainly methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine, as well as cyclosporine, azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil) according to efficacy, evidence level and side-effect profile.

Information used to decide on retreatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration with anti-VEGF in clinical practice.

Purpose. To record the information used in order to make a retreatment decision in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and to assess if an optical coherence tomography (OCT)-only follow-up clinic would suffice.
Methods. Two hundred patients under treatment with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections (anti-VEGF) for exudative AMD were included. Each patient had previously received at least 3 intravitreal anti-VEGF injections (loading dose) (range 3-24 injections). Clinicians seeing the patients beyond the third injection were asked to document the criteria used to make a retreatment decision.
Results. Overall, in 171 (85.5%) cases the retreatment decision was based on OCT findings of intraretinal or subretinal fluid alone. Diagnosis of recurrence requiring treatment would have been missed in 12 cases (6%), if OCT-only data had been used and funduscopy or visual function criteria had been omitted. Decision was based solely on functional criteria in only 2% of the cases. The retreatment decision was based on evaluation of morphologic funduscopic or OCT criteria in 187 (93.5%) cases.
Conclusions. With the increasing number of patients having follow-up after anti- VEGF treatment, efficient systems of follow-up are required. Although most retreatment decisions could have been made by qualitative assessment of OCT images alone, the examination has considerable limitations. Optical coherence tomography in combination with color fundus photography could serve as screening tools for a rational implementation of other invasive imaging techniques such as fundus fluorescein angiography and indocyanine green angiography in decision-making.

Macular ischaemia: a contraindication for anti-VEGF treatment in retinal vascular disease?

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy has been shown to be effective at improving vision in patients with macular oedema due to diabetic retinopathy and vein occlusions, but blocking VEGF at least in theory could be detrimental to vascular integrity. For this reason, some patients with macular ischaemia were excluded from studies showing the effectiveness of therapy. A considerable number of patients present with mixed pathology of macular oedema and macular ischaemia and it is often impossible to determine the degree to which ischaemia accounts for decreased vision. In this review, the authors have dealt with the specific question of whether or not there is evidence to support potential worsening of the macular perfusion and visual function after anti-VEGF treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab for macular oedema secondary to diabetic retinopathy or retinal vein occlusions, especially if there is coexisting macular ischaemia. The authors conclude that anti-VEGF therapy rarely seems to further compromise the retinal circulation; however, worsening of macular ischaemia in the long term cannot be definitely excluded, particularly in eyes with significant ischaemia at baseline and after repeated intraocular anti-VEGF injections. The decision to offer prolonged anti-VEGF treatment in cases of significant coexisting macular ischaemia should not be based only on measurements of macular thickness; instead repeat fluorescein angiograms should be performed.