Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Addict Med ; 11(4): 256-265, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28590391

RESUMO

: Novel synthetic opioids (NSOs) include various analogs of fentanyl and newly emerging non-fentanyl compounds. Together with illicitly manufactured fentanyl (IMF), these drugs have caused a recent spike in overdose deaths, whereas deaths from prescription opioids have stabilized. NSOs are used as stand-alone products, as adulterants in heroin, or as constituents of counterfeit prescription medications. During 2015 alone, there were 9580 deaths from synthetic opioids other than methadone. Most of these fatalities were associated with IMF rather than diverted pharmaceutical fentanyl. In opioid overdose cases, where the presence of fentanyl analogs was examined, analogs were implicated in 17% of fatalities. Recent data from law enforcement sources show increasing confiscation of acetylfentanyl, butyrylfentanyl, and furanylfentanyl, in addition to non-fentanyl compounds such as U-47700. Since 2013, deaths from NSOs in the United States were 52 for acetylfentanyl, 40 for butyrylfentanyl, 128 for furanylfentanyl, and 46 for U-47700. All of these substances induce a classic opioid toxidrome, which can be reversed with the competitive antagonist naloxone. However, due to the putative high potency of NSOs and their growing prevalence, it is recommended to forgo the 0.4 mg initial dose of naloxone and start with 2 mg. Because NSOs offer enormous profit potential, and there is strong demand for their use, these drugs are being trafficked by organized crime. NSOs present major challenges for medical professionals, law enforcement agencies, and policymakers. Resources must be distributed equitably to enhance harm reduction though public education, medication-assisted therapies, and improved access to naloxone.

2.
Am J Addict ; 16(2): 117-23, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17453613

RESUMO

This study was designed to provide an independent evaluation of the oversight and rehabilitation of substance-impaired physicians. Records of 104 physicians who had completed their monitoring period by the New York State Committee on Physicians' Health were selected at random from CPH files. They had been followed for an average of 41.3 months. Practice characteristics and substance use before admission, as well as workplace monitoring, twelve-step attendance, urine toxicologies, and relapse incidence after admission are reported. Significant intercorrelations among these variables were ascertained by logistic regression. The utility of twelve-step-based rehabilitation as part of a treatment plan for sustaining abstinence and averting relapse is discussed.


Assuntos
Monitorização Ambulatorial/métodos , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/reabilitação , Adulto , Convalescença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Recidiva , Inquéritos e Questionários , Local de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
JAMA ; 289(23): 3161-6, 2003 Jun 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12813122

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To encourage treatment of depression and prevention of suicide in physicians by calling for a shift in professional attitudes and institutional policies to support physicians seeking help. PARTICIPANTS: An American Foundation for Suicide Prevention planning group invited 15 experts on the subject to evaluate the state of knowledge about physician depression and suicide and barriers to treatment. The group assembled for a workshop held October 6-7, 2002, in Philadelphia, Pa. EVIDENCE: The planning group worked with each participant on a preworkshop literature review in an assigned area. Abstracts of presentations and key publications were distributed to participants before the workshop. After workshop presentations, participants were assigned to 1 of 2 breakout groups: (1) physicians in their role as patients and (2) medical institutions and professional organizations. The groups identified areas that required further research, barriers to treatment, and recommendations for reform. CONSENSUS PROCESS: This consensus statement emerged from a plenary session during which each work group presented its recommendations. The consensus statement was circulated to and approved by all participants. CONCLUSIONS: The culture of medicine accords low priority to physician mental health despite evidence of untreated mood disorders and an increased burden of suicide. Barriers to physicians' seeking help are often punitive, including discrimination in medical licensing, hospital privileges, and professional advancement. This consensus statement recommends transforming professional attitudes and changing institutional policies to encourage physicians to seek help. As barriers are removed and physicians confront depression and suicidality in their peers, they are more likely to recognize and treat these conditions in patients, including colleagues and medical students.


Assuntos
Depressão/terapia , Transtorno Depressivo/terapia , Serviços de Saúde Mental/normas , Médicos/psicologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Prevenção do Suicídio , Adulto , Depressão/epidemiologia , Transtorno Depressivo/epidemiologia , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Seguro por Deficiência , Licenciamento em Medicina , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inabilitação do Médico , Fatores de Risco , Faculdades de Medicina/normas , Estados Unidos
4.
Virtual Mentor ; 5(9)2003 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23267581
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...