Tuberculosis of the Heart: A Diagnostic Challenge.

Tuberculosis of the heart is relatively rare and presents a significant diagnostic difficulty for physicians. It is the leading cause of death from infectious illness. It is one of the top 10 leading causes of death worldwide, with a disproportionate impact in low- and middle-income nations. The radiologist plays a pivotal role as CMR is a non-invasive radiological method that can aid in identifying potential overlap and differential diagnosis between tuberculosis, mass lesions, pericarditis, and myocarditis. Regardless of similarities or overlap in observations, the combination of clinical and certain particular radiological features, which are also detected by comparison to earlier and follow-up CMR scans, may aid in the differential diagnosis. CMR offers a significant advantage over echocardiography for detecting, characterizing, and assessing cardiovascular abnormalities. In conjunction with clinical presentation, knowledge of LGE, feature tracking, and parametric imaging in CMR may help in the early detection of tuberculous myopericarditis and serve as a surrogate for endomyocardial biopsy resulting in a quicker diagnosis and therapy. This article aims to explain the current state of cardiac tuberculosis, the diagnostic utility of CMR in tuberculosis (TB) patients, and offer an overview of the various imaging and laboratory procedures used to detect cardiac tuberculosis.

Post-RNA (mRNA) Vaccination Myocarditis: CMR Features.

RNA (mRNA) vaccines used to prevent COVID-19 infection may cause myocarditis. We describe a case of acute myocarditis in a 27-year-old male after receiving the second dose of a Pfizer immunization. Three days after receiving the second dose of vaccine, he had acute chest pain. Electrocardiographic examination revealed non-specific ST-T changes in the inferior leads. Troponin levels in his laboratory tests were 733 ng/L. No abnormalities were detected on his echocardiography or coronary angiography. The basal inferoseptal segment was hypokinetic. The LV EF was 50%, whereas the RV EF was 46%. Epicardial and mesocardial LGE were shown in the left ventricle's basal and mid anterolateral, posterolateral, and inferoseptal segments. The native T1 was 1265 ± 54 ms, and the native T2 was 57 ± 10 ms. Myocardial strain indicated that the baseline values for LV GLS (-14.55), RV GLS (-15.8), and RVCS (-6.88) were considerably lower. The diagnosis of acute myocarditis was determined based on the clinical presentation and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) findings.