Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 38(7): 1514-1523, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38664136

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify perioperative risk factors of acute kidney injury after heart transplantation and to evaluate 1-year clinical outcomes. DESIGN: A retrospective single-center cohort study. SETTING: At a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All patients who underwent heart transplantation from January 2015 to December 2020. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The authors recorded acute kidney injury after heart transplantation. One-year mortality and renal function also were recorded. Risk factors of acute kidney injury were evaluated using a multivariate logistic regression model. Long-term survival was compared between patients developing acute kidney injury and those who did not, using a log-rank test. Among 209 patients included in this study, 134 patients (64% [95% CI (58; 71)]) developed posttransplantation acute kidney injury. Factors independently associated with acute kidney injury were high body mass index (odds ratio [OR]: 1.18 [1.02-1.38] per kg/m2; p = 0.030), prolonged duration of cold ischemic period (OR: 1.11 [1.01-1.24] per 10 minutes; p = 0.039), and high dose of intraoperative dobutamine support (OR: 1.24 [1.06-1.46] per µg/kg/min; p = 0.008). At 1 year, patients who developed postoperative acute kidney injury had higher mortality rates (20% v 8%, p = 0.015). Among 172 survivors at 1 year, 82 survivors (48%) had worsened their renal function compared with preheart transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted the high incidence of acute kidney injury after heart transplantation and its impact on patient outcomes. Risk factors such as body mass index, prolonged cold ischemic period duration, and level of inotropic support with dobutamine were identified, providing insights for preventive strategies.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Transplante de Coração , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Transplante de Coração/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Coração/tendências , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Fatores de Tempo , Seguimentos
2.
Crit Care Med ; 49(10): 1717-1725, 2021 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34001691

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Although clinical presentation of coronavirus disease 2019 has been extensively described, immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 remains yet not fully understood. Similarities with bacterial sepsis were observed; however, few studies specifically addressed differences of immune response between both conditions. Here, we report a longitudinal analysis of the immune response in coronavirus disease 2019 patients, its correlation with outcome, and comparison between severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients and septic patients. DESIGN: Longitudinal, retrospective observational study. SETTING: Tertiary-care hospital during the first 2020 coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak in France. PATIENTS: All successive patients with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection admitted to the emergency department, medical ward, and ICU with at least one available immunophenotyping performed during hospital stay. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Between March and April 2020, 247 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 were included and compared with a historical cohort of 108 severe septic patients. Nonsevere coronavirus disease 2019 patients (n = 153) presented normal or slightly altered immune profiles. Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (n = 94) immune profile differed from sepsis. Coronavirus disease 2019 exhibited profound and prolonged lymphopenia (mostly on CD3, CD4, CD8, and NK cells), neutrophilia, and human leukocyte antigen D receptor expression on CD14+ monocytes down-regulation. Surprisingly, coronavirus disease 2019 patients presented a unique profile of B cells expansion, basophilia, and eosinophilia. Lymphopenia, human leukocyte antigen D receptor expression on CD14+ monocytes down-regulation, and neutrophilia were associated with a worsened outcome, whereas basophilia and eosinophilia were associated with survival. Circulating immune cell kinetics differed between severe coronavirus disease 2019 and sepsis, lack of correction of immune alterations in coronavirus disease 2019 patients during the first 2 weeks of ICU admission was associated with death and nosocomial infections. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating immune cells profile differs between mild and severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients. Severe coronavirus disease 2019 is associated with a unique immune profile as compared with sepsis. Several immune features are associated with outcome. Thus, immune monitoring of coronavirus disease 2019 might be of help for patient management.


Assuntos
COVID-19/complicações , Fatores Imunológicos/análise , Cinética , Sepse/complicações , Idoso , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/imunologia , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse/epidemiologia , Sepse/imunologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...