RESUMO
We aimed to systematically review barriers/facilitators of adherence among adolescents with cancer (aged 10-24 years), following a comprehensive approach to adherence that goes beyond medication-taking. Empirical studies published in English exploring determinants of adherence to medical recommendations among adolescents with cancer were identified in MEDLINE, PsycInfo, and Web of Science, up to October 2021. Records and full-text articles were reviewed by two independent reviewers, and results were classified according to the World Health Organization's (WHO) multidimensional adherence model. Eighteen studies were included. Despite heterogeneity in the definition and measurement of adherence, literature supported barriers/facilitators at patient, treatment, condition, healthcare team/system, and social/economic levels. Specifically, patient-related factors (i.e., psychological functioning and beliefs about disease and treatment) and social-related factors (i.e., family functioning) were major determinants of adolescent adherence. Few studies were conducted, and inconsistent findings were displayed for other dimensions (i.e., healthcare team/system, treatment, and condition-related factors). Adherence is a complex and multidetermined phenomenon. More research is needed to provide critical insights for policymakers and healthcare professionals in planning practices and interventions that effectively address meaningful barriers/facilitators of adolescents' adherence.
RESUMO
The unique characteristics of games have led scientific research to increasingly focus on their potential role in learning processes. Currently, their effectiveness in fostering experiential learning and skill acquisition in several areas is already supported by the existing evidence, mainly about the potential of digital games. Paradoxically, the current post-digital era seems to have led to a growing popularity of analog games. The present Systematic Literature Review aimed to map the existing literature on the potential of board, tabletop, or other analog games in learning processes. It intended to systematize the contemporary state of the art (2012-2022) around the pedagogical role of these games, their effectiveness, the promoted learning outcomes, the methodological aspects of the interventions, the used games-including mechanics and other characteristics-and the current discussions around inclusion and accessibility in analog game-based learning. Adopting the PRISMA methodology, we searched ACM Digital Library, EBSCO, ERIC, Scopus-Elsevier, and Web of Science databases, as well as other peer-reviewed "grey literature" sources. The search resulted in an initial sample of 2,741 articles that was then screened by inclusion and exclusion criteria previously defined according to the research objectives. We obtained a final sample of 45 articles. To formulate the mapping of existing research, these studies were analyzed using a combination of statistical, content, and critical analysis procedures. The obtained results support the role of board, tabletop, and other analog games in educational contexts-based on their educational potential-with a broad range of knowledge, cognitive, and psychological outcomes. The study also emphasized the relevance of these games in the promotion of soft skills and other aspects typically associated with meaningful learning, such as engagement, satisfaction, flexibility, and freedom of experimentation. However, important limitations were found in a fair amount of the pedagogical approaches studied, which can be mostly attributed to the low prevalence of modern board games that relate what is intended to be learned to aspects of game design and have little to no consideration of accessibility and inclusion aspects in these studies.
