Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 153(3): 346-352, 2020 02 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31679011

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine adherence to Choosing Wisely recommendations for using serum lipase to diagnose acute pancreatitis rather than amylase, avoiding concurrent amylase/lipase testing and avoiding serial measurements after the first elevated test as both are ineffective for tracking disease course. METHODS: Deidentified laboratory data from four large health systems were analyzed to determine concurrent testing rates, serial testing rates, and provider-ordering patterns. RESULTS: While most providers adhered to recommendations with 58,693 lipase-only tests ordered and performed, 86% of amylase tests were performed concurrently with lipase. Ambulatory, inpatient, and emergency department settings revealed concurrent rates of 51%, 41%, and 8%, respectively. Services with order sets containing both amylase and lipase were associated with higher rates of concurrent testing. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent amylase/lipase testing is an area of opportunity to improve compliance, especially in ambulatory settings. Revision of order sets and provider education could be interventions to reduce unnecessary testing and save costs.


Assuntos
Amilases/sangue , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Lipase/sangue , Pancreatite/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores/sangue , Humanos , Pancreatite/sangue , Pancreatite/economia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...