Feasibility of a Hospital-at-Home Program for Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

The Hospital at Home (HaH) model has been positioned as an appropriate therapeutic strategy for selected patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). This care model provides hospital-equivalent care, in terms of both quality and quantity, with medical and nursing staff that go to the patient's home. Here we describe our experience with a full HaH model for patients undergoing ASCT during the phase of aplasia. The patients met the eligibility criteria between January 1997 and December 2019 and were discharged from the hospital and admitted into the HaH-ASCT program on the same day they in which hematopoietic stem cells were infused. A total of 84 patients were included. The median patient age was 54 years (range, 16 to 74 years), and the median duration of participation in the HaH program was 17 days (range, 3 to 86 days). Only 10 of these patients (12%) required hospital readmission to the hematology department, 9 of them due to sepsis and 1 because of family care support claudication. Seventy-two patients (86%) experienced an episode of neutropenic fever during the HAH admission, with a median duration of 2 days (interquartile range [IQR], 1 to 11 days); all were treated with empiric i.v. antimicrobial therapy. Most patients (88%) presented with mucositis (44% with grade 3-4). Parenteral nutrition was administered in 26% of patients for a median of 6 days (IQR, 1 to 12 days). Most patients (94%) required at least 1 blood product transfusion at home. There was no transplantation-related mortality during the HaH-ASCT program or in the patients who were readmitted. With careful selection of patients and a comprehensive and well- experienced multidisciplinary team (doctors, nurses, and auxiliary nurses) in the HaH department and in close collaboration with the hematology department, complete at-home management of ASCT recipients immediately after transplantation is possible. This allows patients undergoing an aggressive procedure such as ASCT to remain in their own familiar environment, providing a better quality of life with a program that has demonstrated to be effective and safe, with a low incidence of complications and no associated mortality.

Barriers and facilitators in the implementation of a telemedicine-based outpatient brain tumor surgery program.

OBJECTIVE: Despite growing evidence on the benefits of outpatient oncological neurosurgery (OON), it is only performed in a few specialized centers and there are no previous descriptions of established OON programs in Europe. Moreover, increasing application of telemedicine strategies, especially after the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, is drastically changing neurosurgical management, particularly in the case of vulnerable populations such as neuro-oncological patients. In this context, the authors implemented an OON program in their hospital with telematic follow-up. Herein, they describe the protocol and qualitatively analyze the barriers and facilitators of the development process. METHODS: An OON program was developed through the following steps: assessment of hospital needs, specific OON training, multidisciplinary team organization, and OON protocol design. In addition, the implementation phase included training sessions, a pilot study, and continuous improvement sessions. Finally, barriers and facilitators of the protocol's implementation were identified from the feedback of all participants. RESULTS: An OON protocol was successfully designed and implemented for resection or biopsy of supratentorial lesions up to 3 cm in diameter. The protocol included the patient's admission to the day surgery unit, noninvasive anesthetic monitoring, same-day discharge, and admission to the hospital-at-home (HaH) unit for telematic and on-site postoperative care. After a pilot study including 10 procedures in 9 patients, the main barriers identified were healthcare provider resistance to change, lack of experience in outpatient neurosurgery, patient reluctance, and limitations in the recruitment of patients. Key facilitators of the process were the patient education program, the multidisciplinary team approach, and the HaH-based telematic postoperative care. CONCLUSIONS: Initiating an OON program with telematic follow-up in a European clinical setting is feasible. Nevertheless, it poses several barriers that can be overcome by identifying and maximizing key facilitators of the process. Among them, patient education, a multidisciplinary team approach, and HaH-based postoperative care were crucial to the success of the program. Future studies should investigate the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine to assess potential cost savings, from reduced travel and wait times, and the impact on patient satisfaction.