Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Urology ; 134: 2-23, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31415778

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study reports the re-operation and symptom resolution rates of different techniques used in surgical excision of genitourinary mesh erosions. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic review was completed after searching electronic databases for studies involving outcomes of mesh erosion in humans that were managed surgically using a transvaginal, cystoscopic, or abdominal approach. Surgical outcomes were reported in percentages, ranges, and simple pooling to generate trends in management techniques. RESULTS: There were 177 cases that met our inclusion criteria. Forty-one patients underwent cystoscopic removal of eroded urethral mesh while 40 cases underwent transvaginal removal of urethral mesh. CONCLUSIONS: For mesh eroded into the urethra, a transvaginal vs. cystoscopic approach showed a trend toward resolution of symptoms and fewer interventions. For mesh eroded into the bladder, abdominal and cystoscopic approaches had similar symptom resolution, but abdominal approach required fewer interventions.


Assuntos
Falha de Prótese , Reoperação , Telas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urogenitais , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Humanos , Falha de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Falha de Prótese/etiologia , Reoperação/efeitos adversos , Reoperação/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urogenitais/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urogenitais/instrumentação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urogenitais/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...