Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Perinatol ; 37(11): 1215-1219, 2017 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28880258

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of the latest randomized controlled trial (RCT) to each systematic review (SR) in Cochrane Neonatal Reviews. STUDY DESIGN: We selected meta-analyses reporting the typical point estimate of the risk ratio for the primary outcome of the latest study (n=130), mortality (n=128) and the mean difference for the primary outcome (n=44). We employed cumulative meta-analysis to determine the typical estimate after each trial was added, and then performed multivariable logistic regression to determine factors predictive of study impact. RESULTS: For the stated primary outcome, 18% of latest RCTs failed to narrow the confidence interval (CI), and 55% failed to decrease the CI by ⩾20%. Only 8% changed the typical estimate directionality, and 11% caused a change to or from significance. Latest RCTs did not change the typical estimate in 18% of cases, and only 41% changed the typical estimate by at least 10%. The ability to narrow the CI by >20% was negatively associated with the number of previously published RCTs (odds ratio 0.707). Similar results were found in analysis of typical estimates for the outcomes of mortality and mean difference. CONCLUSION: Across a broad range of clinical questions, the latest RCT failed to substantially narrow the CI of the typical estimate, to move the effect estimate or to change its statistical significance in a majority of cases. Investigators and grant peer review committees should consider prioritizing less-studied topics or requiring formal consideration of optimal information size based on extant evidence in power calculations.


Assuntos
Metanálise como Assunto , Neonatologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Incerteza , Intervalos de Confiança , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Literatura de Revisão como Assunto
2.
J Perinatol ; 32(7): 532-8, 2012 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22076416

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Moderately premature infants, defined here as those born between 30°/7 and 346/7 weeks gestation, comprise 3.9% of all births in the United States and 32% of all preterm births. Although long-term outcomes for these infants are better than for less mature infants, morbidity and mortality are still substantially increased in comparison with infants born at term. There is an added survival benefit resulting from birth at a tertiary neonatal care center, and although many of these infants require tertiary level care, delivery at lower level hospitals and subsequent neonatal transfer are still common. Our primary aim was to determine the impact of maternal characteristics and antenatal medical management on the early neonatal course of the moderately premature infant. The secondary aim was to create a clinical prediction rule to determine which infants require intubation and mechanical ventilation in the first 24 h of life. Such a prediction rule could inform the decision to transfer maternal-fetal patients before delivery to a facility with a Level III neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), where optimal care could be provided without the requirement for a neonatal transfer. STUDY DESIGN: Data for this analysis came from the cohort of infants in the Moderately Premature Infant Project (MPIP) database, a multicenter cohort study of 850 infants born at gestational age 30°/7 and 346/7 weeks, with birth weight between 591 to 3540 g. [corrected], who were discharged to home alive. We built a logistic regression model to identify maternal characteristics associated with need for tertiary care, as measured by administration of surfactant. Using statistically significant covariates from this model, we then created a numerical decision rule to predict need for tertiary care. RESULT: In multivariate modeling, four factors were associated with reduction in the need for tertiary care, including non-White race (odds ratio (OR)=0.5, (0.3, 0.7)), older gestational age, female gender (OR=0.6 (0.4, 0.8)) and use of antenatal corticosteroids (OR=0.5, (0.3, 0.8)). The clinical prediction rule to discriminate between infants who received surfactant, versus those who did not, had an area under the curve of 0.77 (0.73, 0.8). CONCLUSION: Four antenatal risk factors are associated with a requirement for Level III NICU care as defined by the need for surfactant administration. Future analyses will examine a broader spectrum of antenatal characteristics and revalidate the prediction rule in an independent cohort.


Assuntos
Doenças do Prematuro/terapia , Transferência de Pacientes , Nascimento Prematuro , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Masculino , Gravidez , Surfactantes Pulmonares/uso terapêutico
3.
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi ; 18(12): 718-9, 762, 1993 Dec.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8011081

RESUMO

Through many years' research, a set of cultivation techniques for Rehmannia glutinosa in summer has been found out as "selecting necks in autumn; growing seedlings with plastic films in early spring; culturing around summer solstice and reaping after autumn". A Study has also been made on the scope feasible for spreading the application of these techniques.


Assuntos
Plantas Medicinais/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Medicina Tradicional Chinesa , Farmacognosia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...