Late Effects of Craniospinal Irradiation Using Electron Spinal Fields for Pediatric Patients With Cancer.

PURPOSE: For children, craniospinal irradiation (CSI) with photons is associated with significant toxic effects. The use of electrons for spinal fields is hypothesized to spare anterior structures but the long-term effects remain uncertain. We studied late effects of CSI using electrons for spinal radiation therapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Records of 84 consecutive patients treated with CSI using electrons for the spine at a single institution between 1983 and 2014 were reviewed. Median age at RT was 5 (range, 1-14) years. The most common histologies were medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor (59%) and ependymoma (8%). The median prescribed dose to the entire spine was 30 Gy (range, 6-45). A subset of 48 (57%) patients aged 2 to 14 at RT with clinical follow-up for ≥5 years was analyzed for late effects. Height z scores adjusted for age before and after CSI were assessed using stature-for-age charts and compared with a t test. RESULTS: At median follow-up of 19 years (range, 0-38 years), the median survival was 22 years (95% confidence interval, 12-28 years) after RT, with 47 patients (56%) alive at last follow-up. On subset analysis for late effects, 19 (40%) patients developed hypothyroidism and 5 (10%) developed secondary malignancies. Other complications reported were esophageal stricture and periaortic hemorrhage in 1 and restrictive pulmonary disease in 1 patient. Median height z score before treatment was -0.4 (36th percentile; interquartile range, -1.0 to 0.0) and at last follow-up was -2.2 (first percentile; interquartile range, -3.1 to -1.6; P < .001). Of 44 patients with spinal curvature assessments, 15 (34%) had scoliosis with median Cobb angle 15° (range, 10°-35°) and 1 (2%) required surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Frequent musculoskeletal toxic effects and predominantly decreased height were seen with long-term follow-up. Scoliosis and hypothyroidism were each seen in at least one-third of long-term survivors. However, clinically evident esophageal, pulmonary, and cardiac toxic effects were infrequent.

Outcomes after surgery and radiotherapy for spinal myxopapillary ependymoma: update of the MD Anderson Cancer Center experience.

BACKGROUND: The role of radiotherapy after surgery for myxopapillary ependymoma (MPE) is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To review long-term outcomes after surgery, with or without radiation, for spinal MPE. METHODS: Fifty-one patients with spinal MPE treated from 1968 to 2007 were included. Associations between clinical variables and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local control (LC) were tested with Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The median age at diagnosis was 35 years (range, 8-63 years). Twenty patients (39%) had surgery alone, 30 (59%) had surgery plus radiotherapy (RT), and 1 (2%) had RT only. At a median follow-up of 11 years (range, 0.2-37 years), 10-year OS, PFS, and LC for the entire group were 93%, 63%, and 67%, respectively. Nineteen patients (37%) had disease recurrence, and the recurrence was mostly local (79%). Twenty-eight of 50 patients who had surgery (56%) had gross total resection; 10-year LC was 56% after surgery vs 92% after surgery and RT (log-rank P = .14); the median time of LC was 10.5 years for patients receiving gross total resection plus RT, and 4.75 years for gross total resection only (P = .03). Among 16 patients with subtotal resection and follow-up data, 10-year LC was 0% after surgery vs 65% for surgery plus RT (log-rank P = .008). On multivariate analyses adjusting for resection type, age older that 35 years at diagnosis and receipt of adjuvant radiation were associated with improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.14, P = .003 and HR: 0.45, P = .009) and LC (HR: 0.22, P = .02 and HR: 0.45, P = .009). CONCLUSION: Postoperative radiotherapy after resection of MPE was associated with improved PFS and LC.

Central nervous system cancers.

Primary and metastatic tumors of the central nervous system are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with varied outcomes and management strategies. Recently, improved survival observed in 2 randomized clinical trials established combined chemotherapy and radiation as the new standard for treating patients with pure or mixed anaplastic oligodendroglioma harboring the 1p/19q codeletion. For metastatic disease, increasing evidence supports the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery in treating patients with multiple metastatic lesions but low overall tumor volume. These guidelines provide recommendations on the diagnosis and management of this group of diseases based on clinical evidence and panel consensus. This version includes expert advice on the management of low-grade infiltrative astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas, anaplastic gliomas, glioblastomas, medulloblastomas, supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors, and brain metastases. The full online version, available at NCCN. org, contains recommendations on additional subtypes.

Long-term results of RTOG 91-11: a comparison of three nonsurgical treatment strategies to preserve the larynx in patients with locally advanced larynx cancer.

PURPOSE: To report the long-term results of the Intergroup Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 91-11 study evaluating the contribution of chemotherapy added to radiation therapy (RT) for larynx preservation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage III or IV glottic or supraglottic squamous cell cancer were randomly assigned to induction cisplatin/fluorouracil (PF) followed by RT (control arm), concomitant cisplatin/RT, or RT alone. The composite end point of laryngectomy-free survival (LFS) was the primary end point. RESULTS: Five hundred twenty patients were analyzed. Median follow-up for surviving patients is 10.8 years. Both chemotherapy regimens significantly improved LFS compared with RT alone (induction chemotherapy v RT alone: hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.95; P = .02; concomitant chemotherapy v RT alone: HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.98; P = .03). Overall survival did not differ significantly, although there was a possibility of worse outcome with concomitant relative to induction chemotherapy (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.61; P = .08). Concomitant cisplatin/RT significantly improved the larynx preservation rate over induction PF followed by RT (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.89; P = .0050) and over RT alone (P < .001), whereas induction PF followed by RT was not better than treatment with RT alone (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.82; P = .35). No difference in late effects was detected, but deaths not attributed to larynx cancer or treatment were higher with concomitant chemotherapy (30.8% v 20.8% with induction chemotherapy and 16.9% with RT alone). CONCLUSION: These 10-year results show that induction PF followed by RT and concomitant cisplatin/RT show similar efficacy for the composite end point of LFS. Locoregional control and larynx preservation were significantly improved with concomitant cisplatin/RT compared with the induction arm or RT alone. New strategies that improve organ preservation and function with less morbidity are needed.

Neurocognition in patients with brain metastases treated with radiosurgery or radiosurgery plus whole-brain irradiation: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether the benefit of adding whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the control of brain-tumours outweighs the potential neurocognitive risks. We proposed that the learning and memory functions of patients who undergo SRS plus WBRT are worse than those of patients who undergo SRS alone. We did a randomised controlled trial to test our prediction. METHODS: Patients with one to three newly diagnosed brain metastases were randomly assigned using a standard permutated block algorithm with random block sizes to SRS plus WBRT or SRS alone from Jan 2, 2001, to Sept 14, 2007. Patients were stratified by recursive partitioning analysis class, number of brain metastases, and radioresistant histology. The randomisation sequence was masked until assignation, at which point both clinicians and patients were made aware of the treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was neurocognitive function: objectively measured as a significant deterioration (5-point drop compared with baseline) in Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) total recall at 4 months. An independent data monitoring committee monitored the trial using Bayesian statistical methods. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. This trial is registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00548756. FINDINGS: After 58 patients were recruited (n=30 in the SRS alone group, n=28 in the SRS plus WBRT group), the trial was stopped by the data monitoring committee according to early stopping rules on the basis that there was a high probability (96%) that patients randomly assigned to receive SRS plus WBRT were significantly more likely to show a decline in learning and memory function (mean posterior probability of decline 52%) at 4 months than patients assigned to receive SRS alone (mean posterior probability of decline 24%). At 4 months there were four deaths (13%) in the group that received SRS alone, and eight deaths (29%) in the group that received SRS plus WBRT. 73% of patients in the SRS plus WBRT group were free from CNS recurrence at 1 year, compared with 27% of patients who received SRS alone (p=0.0003). In the SRS plus WBRT group, one case of grade 3 toxicity (seizures, motor neuropathy, depressed level of consciousness) was attributed to radiation treatment. In the group that received SRS, one case of grade 3 toxicity (aphasia) was attributed to radiation treatment. Two cases of grade 4 toxicity in the group that received SRS alone were diagnosed as radiation necrosis. INTERPRETATION: Patients treated with SRS plus WBRT were at a greater risk of a significant decline in learning and memory function by 4 months compared with the group that received SRS alone. Initial treatment with a combination of SRS and close clinical monitoring is recommended as the preferred treatment strategy to better preserve learning and memory in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases.

Phase I/II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastasis and its pattern of failure.

OBJECT: The authors report data concerning the safety, effectiveness, and patterns of failure obtained in a Phase I/II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spinal metastatic tumors. METHODS: Sixty-three cancer patients underwent near-simultaneous computed tomography-guided SBRT. Spinal magnetic resonance imaging was conducted at baseline and at each follow-up visit. The National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria 2.0 assessments were used to evaluate toxicity. RESULTS: The median tumor volume of 74 spinal metastatic lesions was 37.4 cm3 (range 1.6-358 cm3). No neuropathy or myelopathy was observed during a median follow-up period of 21.3 months (range 0.9-49.6 months). The actuarial 1-year tumor progression-free incidence was 84% for all tumors. Pattern-of-failure analysis showed two primary mechanisms of failure: 1) recurrence in the bone adjacent to the site of previous treatment, and 2) recurrence in the epidural space adjacent to the spinal cord. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities were limited to acute Grade 3 nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea (one case); Grade 3 dysphagia and trismus (one case); and Grade 3 noncardiac chest pain (one case). There was no subacute or late Grade 3 or 4 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the data obtained in the present study supports the safety and effectiveness of SBRT in cases of spinal metastatic cancer. The authors consider it prudent to routinely treat the pedicles and posterior elements using a wide bone margin posterior to the diseased vertebrae because of the possible direct extension into these structures. For patients without a history of radiotherapy, more liberal spinal cord dose constraints than those used in this study could be applied to help reduce failures in the epidural space.

Stereotactic radiosurgical treatment of cerebral metastases arising from breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the outcome of patients undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as primary or salvage treatment of brain metastases arising from breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 2000 and September 2005, the medical records of 49 breast cancer patients who underwent SRS for 84 brain metastases were reviewed retrospectively. Thirty-four patients received SRS as primary brain metastasis treatment and 15 patients received SRS as salvage treatment of brain metastasis recurrence following prior whole-brain radiation therapy. The Kaplan-Meier method, univariate comparisons with log-rank test, and multivariate analysis were performed. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 12 months (range, 5-50 months) and median survival was 19 months for all patients. The 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 60%, 56%, and 55%, 23% for initial SRS alone and SRS salvage groups, respectively (P = 0.99). A multivariate analysis showed that a high KPS score (KPS > or =90 vs. <90; P = 0.02), a higher SIR value (SIR > or =6 vs. <6; P = 0.001), postmenopausal status (P = 0.003), and positive estrogen receptor status (P = 0.04) were predictive of better survival. The 1- and 2-year local control rates were 79%, 49%, and 77%, 46% for SRS alone and SRS salvage group, respectively. CONCLUSION: SRS can be used as primary treatment of brain metastases or salvage of recurrences after whole-brain radiation therapy to achieve good local control on the order of close to 80% at 1 year. The median survival of brain metastasis patients with breast cancer of 19 months appears favorable compared with the general brain metastasis population.

A pilot study of neurocognitive function in patients with one to three new brain metastases initially treated with stereotactic radiosurgery alone.

OBJECTIVE: Whether to administer or omit adjuvant whole-brain radiation therapy in conjunction with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the initial management of patients with one to three newly diagnosed brain metastases is the subject of debate. This report provides data from a pilot study in which neurocognitive function (NCF) was prospectively measured for patients with one to three newly diagnosed brain metastases treated with initial SRS alone. METHODS: Fifteen patients were prospectively treated with initial SRS alone. Assessment of NCF and magnetic resonance imaging scans were performed. RESULTS: At baseline, 67% of the patients had impairment on one or more tests of NCF. The domains most frequently impaired at baseline were executive function, motor dexterity, and learning/memory with an incidence of 50, 40, and 27% respectively. Brain metastasis volume (.3 cm3) measured at the time of initial SRS treatment was associated with worse performance on a measure of attention (P < 0.05). At 1 month, declines in the learning/memory and motor dexterity domains were most common. In a subgroup of five patients still alive 200 days after enrollment, four patients (80%) demonstrated stable or improved learning/memory, three (60%) demonstrated stable or improved executive function, and three (60%) demonstrated stable or improved motor dexterity relative to their baseline evaluation. CONCLUSION: Although two-thirds of the brain metastasis patients had impaired NCF at baseline, the majority of five long-term survivors had stable or improved NCF performance across executive function, learning/memory, and motor dexterity.

Evaluation of peritumoral edema in the delineation of radiotherapy clinical target volumes for glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the spatial relationship between peritumoral edema and recurrence pattern in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-eight primary GBM patients received three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy that did not intentionally include peritumoral edema within the clinical target volume between July 2000 and June 2001. All 48 patients have subsequently recurred, and their original treatment planning parameters were used for this study. New theoretical radiation treatment plans were created for the same 48 patients, based on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) target delineation guidelines that specify inclusion of peritumoral edema. Target volume and recurrent tumor coverage, as well as percent volume of normal brain irradiated, were assessed for both methods of target delineation using dose-volume histograms. RESULTS: A comparison between the location of recurrent tumor and peritumoral edema volumes from all 48 cases failed to show correlation by linear regression modeling (r(2) = 0.0007; p = 0.3). For patients with edema >75 cm(3), the percent volume of brain irradiated to 46 Gy was significantly greater in treatment plans that intentionally included peritumoral edema compared with those that did not (38% vs. 31%; p = 0.003). The pattern of failure was identical between the two sets of plans (40 central, 3 in-field, 3 marginal, and 2 distant recurrence). CONCLUSION: Clinical target volume delineation based on a 2-cm margin rather than on peritumoral edema did not seem to alter the central pattern of failure for patients with GBM. For patients with peritumoral edema >75 cm(3), using a constant 2-cm margin resulted in a smaller median percent volume of brain being irradiated to 30 Gy, 46 Gy, and 50 Gy compared with corresponding theoretical RTOG plans that deliberately included peritumoral edema.

Focal and craniospinal irradiation for patients with intracranial germinoma and patterns of failure.

BACKGROUND: The authors compared the patterns of failure in patients with intracranial germinoma who were managed with either chemotherapy and focal irradiation or with craniospinal irradiation (CSI). METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on 21 patients with intracranial germinoma and treated with radiotherapy (RT) to the central nervous system at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center from 1981 to 2002. The study group was comprised of 13 males and 8 females with a median age at diagnosis of 19 years. Nine patients received chemotherapy prior to focal RT. Twelve patients received CSI. RESULTS: The actuarial 10-year survival rate for all patients was 86%. The overall survival rate at 10 years was 89% for patients who received focal RT and 83% for patients who received CSI (P = .73). The 10-year local control rate in the brain for patients who received focal irradiation was 59% compared with 100% for patients who received CSI (P = .08). The rate of distant control in the spine at 5 years was 62% for patients who received focal irradiation and 100% for patients who received CSI (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Although focal techniques of irradiation with chemotherapy are attractive methods that limited the volume irradiated, the strategy appeared to be associated with increased rates of failures in the brain and spine.

Phase II Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial of conventional radiation therapy followed by treatment with recombinant interferon-beta for supratentorial glioblastoma: results of RTOG 9710.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine whether recombinant human interferon beta-1a (rhIFN-beta), when given after radiation therapy, improves survival in glioblastoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: After surgery, 109 patients with newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma were enrolled and treated with radiation therapy (60 Gy). A total of 55 patients remained stable after radiation and were treated with rhIFN-beta (6 MU/day i.m., 3 times/week). Outcomes were compared with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group glioma historical database. RESULTS: RhIFN-beta was well tolerated, with 1 Grade 4 toxicity and 8 other patients experiencing Grade 3 toxicity. Median survival time (MST) of the 55 rhIFN-beta-treated patients was 13.4 months. MST for the 34 rhIFN-beta-treated in RPA Classes III and IV was 16.9 vs. 12.4 months for historical controls (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.89-1.81). There was also a trend toward improved survival across all RPA Classes comparing the 55 rhIFN-beta treated patients and 1,658 historical controls (HR = 1.24, 95% CI = 0.94-1.63). The high rate of early failures (54/109) after radiation and before initiation of rhIFN-beta was likely caused by stricter interpretation of early radiographic changes in the current study. Matched-pair and intent-to-treat analyses performed to try to address this bias showed no difference in survival between study patients and controls. CONCLUSION: RhIFN-beta given after conventional radiation therapy was well tolerated, with a trend toward survival benefit in patients who remained stable after radiation therapy. These data suggest that rhIFN-beta warrants further evaluation in additional studies, possibly in combination with current temozolomide-based regimens.

Spinal myxopapillary ependymoma outcomes in patients treated with surgery and radiotherapy at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.

This study was undertaken to determine the disease outcomes in patients treated with surgery alone or surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for myxopapillary ependymoma (MPE) of the spine. The medical records of 35 patients with MPE treated at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center between December 1968 and July 2002 were reviewed. The endpoints analyzed were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and local control. The median age of patients was 35 years (range, 14-63 years), and the male to female ratio was 2.5:1. In total, 21 (60%) patients underwent a gross total resection, 13 (37%) a subtotal resection, and 1 (3%) a biopsy only; 22 of them (63%) also received adjuvant RT. The median follow-up was 10.7 years. The 10-year overall survival, PFS, and local control rates for the entire group were 97%, 62%, and 72%, respectively. Of 11 patients 5 (45%) who had undergone gross total resection alone had recurrence. A total of 12 (34%) patients had disease recurrence, all in the neural axis; 8 of them had treatment failure at the primary site only, 3 in the distant neural axis only, and 1 at the primary site and in the distant neural axis. Patient age (> 35 years; P = 0.002) and adjuvant RT (P = 0.04) significantly affected PFS. The long-term patient survival duration for MPE managed with surgery and adjuvant RT is favorable. Regardless of the extent of resection, adjuvant RT appears to significantly reduce the rate of tumor progression. Failures occurred exclusively in the neural axis, mainly at the primary site.

Case-control study of stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.

OBJECT: The role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) was evaluated in a case-control study. METHODS: All patients who underwent SRS for recurrent GBM before March 2003 formed the case group. A control group of patients who did not undergo SRS was created from an institutional database, and each case was matched for known prognostic factors in GBM. The medical and neuroimaging records of all the patients were reviewed, and survival and treatment outcomes were recorded. The case and control groups were well matched with regard to demographics and pre-SRS interventions. In the control group, the date on which magnetic resonance imaging identified a recurrent lesion that would have been eligible for SRS was deemed the "SRS" date. The number of surgeries performed in the control group was statistically higher than that in the case group. The median duration of overall survival from diagnosis was 26 months in the case group and 23 months in the control group. From the date of SRS or "SRS", the median duration of survival was 11 months in the case group and 10 months in the control group, a difference that was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that a subgroup of patients with GBMs has a higher than expected median survival duration despite the initial prognostic factors. In patients with localized recurrences, survival may be prolonged by applying aggressive local disease management by using either SRS or resection to equal advantage.

Treatment planning with protons for pediatric retinoblastoma, medulloblastoma, and pelvic sarcoma: how do protons compare with other conformal techniques?

PURPOSE: To calculate treatment plans and compare the dose distributions and dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for photon three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), electron therapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and standard (nonintensity modulated) proton therapy in three pediatric disease sites. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The tumor volumes from 8 patients (3 retinoblastomas, 2 medulloblastomas, and 3 pelvic sarcomas) were studied retrospectively to compare DVHs from proton therapy with 3D-CRT, electron therapy, and IMRT. In retinoblastoma, several planning techniques were analyzed: A single electron appositional beam was compared with a single 3D-CRT lateral beam, a 3D-CRT anterior beam paired with a lateral beam, IMRT, and protons. In medulloblastoma, three posterior fossa irradiation techniques were analyzed: 3D-CRT, IMRT, and protons. Craniospinal irradiation (which consisted of composite plans of both the posterior fossa and craniospinal components) was also evaluated, primarily comparing spinal irradiation using 3D-CRT electrons, 3D-CRT photons, and protons. Lastly, in pelvic sarcoma, 3D-CRT, IMRT, and proton plans were assessed. RESULTS: In retinoblastoma, protons resulted in the best target coverage combined with the most orbital bone sparing (10% was the mean orbital bone volume irradiated at > or =5 Gy for protons vs. 25% for 3D-CRT electrons, 69% for IMRT, 41% for a single 3D lateral beam, 51% for a 3D anterolateral beam with a lens block, and 65% for a 3D anterolateral beam without a lens block). A single appositional electron field was the next best technique followed by other planning approaches. In medulloblastoma, for posterior fossa and craniospinal irradiation, protons resulted in the least dose to the cochlea (for only posterior fossa irradiation at > or =20 Gy, 34% was the mean cochlear volume irradiated for protons, 87% for IMRT, 89% for 3D-CRT) and hypothalamus-pituitary axis (for only posterior fossa irradiation at > or =10 Gy, 21% was the mean hypothalamus-pituitary volume irradiated for protons, 81% for IMRT, 91% for 3D-CRT); additional dose reductions to the optic chiasm, eyes, vertebrae, mandible, thyroid, lung, kidneys, heart, and liver were seen. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy appeared to be the second best technique for posterior fossa irradiation. For spinal irradiation 3D-CRT electrons were better than 3D-CRT photons in sparing dose to the thyroid, heart, lung, kidney, and liver. With pelvic sarcoma, protons were superior in eliminating any dose to the ovaries (0% of mean ovarian volume was irradiated at > or =2 Gy with protons) and to some extent, the pelvic bones and vertebrae. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy did show more bladder dose reduction than the other techniques in pelvic sarcoma irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: In the diseases studied, using various techniques of 3D-CRT, electrons, IMRT, and protons, protons are most optimal in treating retinoblastomas, medulloblastomas (posterior fossa and craniospinal), and pelvic sarcomas. Protons delivered superior target dose coverage and sparing of normal structures. As dose-volume parameters are expected to correlate with acute and late toxicity, proton therapy should receive serious consideration as the preferred technique for the treatment of pediatric tumors.

Outcome variation among "radioresistant" brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of histopathological diagnosis on the outcome of "radioresistant" brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS: Patients (n = 189) with "radioresistant" brain metastases (n = 264) were consecutively treated with SRS between August 1991 and July 2002. The primary site of brain metastases was melanoma (n = 103), renal cell carcinoma (n = 77), and sarcoma (n = 9). The median age of the patients was 52 years, and the median Karnofsky Performance Scale score was 80. Initial brain metastasis presentation was single in 112 patients (59%). The median SRS dose was 18 Gy (range, 10-24 Gy). The median tumor volume was 1.6 cm3 (range, 0.06-27.5 cm3). The median follow-up of all patients was 7.4 months (range, 0.16-52 mo). RESULTS: The actuarial freedom from progression after 1 year was 64% for renal cell carcinoma patients, 47% for melanoma patients, and 0% for sarcoma patients (P < 0.001). The median survival time for all patients from time of SRS was 7.5 months. The rate of 1-year survival was 40% for renal cell carcinoma patients, 25% for melanoma patients, and 22% for sarcoma patients (P = 0.0354). The incidence of neurological death was lower among patients diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma (31%) than among patients with melanoma (66%) or sarcoma (60%) (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Survival after SRS is significantly worse for patients with melanoma and sarcoma brain metastases compared with patients with renal cell carcinoma. Our data show that progressive brain metastases seem to cause most of the cancer-related deaths among patients with SRS-treated melanoma and sarcoma brain metastases. Future investigations using chemotherapy or novel agents to enhance the effectiveness of SRS to melanoma and sarcoma brain metastases seem warranted.

Phase I clinical evaluation of near-simultaneous computed tomographic image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases.

PURPOSE: To evaluate in a Phase I study the safety, feasibility, and patient-positioning accuracy of treating patients with intensity-modulated, near-simultaneous, computed tomographic (CT) image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen consecutive patients with metastatic spinal disease who met protocol eligibility criteria were entered into a Phase I clinical trial. Each patient received five treatments of intensity-modulated, near-simultaneous CT image-guided SBRT, for a total of 75 treatments with 90 isocenter setups during the course of the study. Patients uniformly received 30 Gy (if possible) of radiotherapy in 5 fractions to the clinical target volume. The total dose was constrained by limiting the spinal cord to a maximum dose of 10 Gy. To verify correct daily patient positioning before each treatment and to determine the daily treatment setup error after radiation delivery, axial CT scans were taken before and immediately after each treatment without moving the patient from the treatment position, for comparison with the planning CT scan. Toxicity was measured using the Common Toxicity Criteria, the Late Effects of Normal Tissue scoring system and a neurologic function scale. Follow-up was conducted 4 weeks after completion of SBRT, and then 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, and every 6 months thereafter. RESULTS: The procedure was technically feasible to perform in all patients. No neurologic toxicity was observed in any patient. The median follow-up time was 9 months (range 6-16). The Clopper-Pearson upper bound on the probability of paralysis with 95% confidence is no greater than 0.181. The positional setup error was determined to be within 1 mm of planning isocenter. CONCLUSIONS: This Phase I study shows that intensity-modulated, near simultaneous, CT image-guided SBRT is a feasible, and highly precise technique for the noninvasive treatment of spinal metastases. Although no paralysis has developed in the 15 patients treated, continued monitoring for spinal cord toxicity is warranted, as larger numbers of patients will be needed to more precisely define the upper bound on the probability of spinal cord myelopathy.