Atrial fibrillation in recipients of cardiac resynchronization therapy device: 1-year results of the randomized MASCOT trial.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients suffering from heart failure (HF). Patients in New York Heart Association HF classes III or IV, with systolic dysfunction and a wide QRS, are candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), and might benefit from atrial overdrive pacing (AOP). METHODS: The Management of Atrial fibrillation Suppression in AF-HF COmorbidity Therapy (MASCOT) trial enrolled 409 CRT device recipients (79% men), who were randomly assigned to AOP ON (n = 197), versus AOP OFF (n = 197) and followed up for 1 year. Their mean age was 68 +/- 10 years, left ventricular ejection fraction 25 +/- 6%, QRS duration 163 +/- 29 milliseconds. New York Heart Association class III was present in 86% of patients and 19% had a history of paroxysmal AF. The primary study end point was incidence of permanent AF at 1 year. RESULTS: Atrial overdrive pacing increased the percentage of atrial pacing from 30% to 80% (P < .0001), was well tolerated, and did not interfere with (a) delivery of CRT (95% mean ventricular pacing in both groups), (b) response to CRT (70% responders in the control vs 67% in the treatment group), or (c) cardiac function (left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 24.5% +/- 6.2% to 32.7% +/- 10.9% in the control and from 25.8% +/- 6.8% to 33.1% +/- 12.6% in the treatment group). The incidence of permanent AF was 3.3% in both groups. By logistic regression analysis, a history of AF (P < .001) and absence of antiarrhythmic drugs (P = .002) were associated with permanent AF. CONCLUSIONS: In this first trial of a specific AF prevention algorithm in CRT recipients, AOP was safe and did not worsen HF. The prevention algorithm did not lower the 1-year incidence of AF.

Atrial premature complexes and heart rate have prognostic significance in 1-month atrial fibrillation recurrence after electrical cardioversion.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the significance of simple 24-h Holter (24H) data after electrical cardioversion (CV) for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. METHODS: We prospectively studied 47 consecutive patients subjected to CV, who successfully converted to sinus rhythm. All underwent echocardiography and 24H after CV. AF recurrence was studied at 14 days and 1 month by second 24H or by interim report of AF. RESULTS: About 53.2% remained in sinus rhythm (group I) and the rest recurred to AF (group II). Group I had fewer atrial premature complexes per hour (APC/h) (P = 0.002) and lower maximum (max HR), average, and minimum heart rates compared with group II (all Ps < 0.05). The optimal value of APC/h and max HR with best sensitivity and specificity was 32 APC/h and 90 bpm, respectively. These findings were the predictors of AF recurrence [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.5 with 95% CI = 1.7-11.7 and HR = 4.3 with 95% CI = 1.7-10.9, respectively]. Patients with the combination of both predictors had greater HR of AF recurrence compared with those with < 32 APC/h and max HR < 90 bpm (HR = 8.8 with 95% CI = 2.5-31.4). CONCLUSION: Patients with frequent APC/h and high max HR are at high risk for 1-month AF recurrence after electrical CV.

Pre-treatment with Irbesartan attenuates left atrial stunning after electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Left atrial (LA) stunning, the transient impairment of LA function, is responsible for an increased thrombo-embolic risk after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF). Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) attenuate atrial remodelling in AF and could theoretically influence LA stunning. We studied the effect of Irbesartan on LA stunning. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively assigned 50 patients from the outpatient clinic undergoing electrical cardioversion for AF with duration of >4 weeks, into two matched groups: 25 patients were treated with Irbesartan (228+/-93 mg/day) for at least 2 weeks prior to cardioversion (Irbesartan group); 25 patients did not receive ARBs (control group). The groups did not differ concerning age (64+/-13 vs. 63+/-13 years, respectively), AF duration (20+/-18 vs. 20+/-19 weeks), underlying disease, LA diameter (46+/-7 vs. 47+/-9 mm), left ventricular dimensions, and ejection fraction (47.7+/-11.6 vs. 49.7+/-14.5%). We assessed LA appendage emptying velocities (LAAEV) and LA spontaneous echo contrast (LASEC) by transoesophageal echocardiography before and after cardioversion and at 2 weeks, and the A-wave by transthoracic echocardiography after cardioversion, at 2 and at 4 weeks. LA stunning was significantly attenuated in the Irbesartan group. The reduction of LAAEV immediately after cardioversion was significantly less in the Irbesartan group (LAAEV reduction of 9+/-49% from 28+/-9 cm/s before cardioversion to 25+/-13 cm/s immediately afterwards) than in the control group (reduction of 48+/-20% from 34+/-15 cm/s before cardioversion to 16+/-6 cm/s afterwards) (P = 0.048). New or increased LASEC occurred in eight patients (32%) in the Irbesartan vs. 16 patients (64%) in the control group (P = 0.046). CONCLUSION: Irbesartan significantly attenuates LA stunning after electrical cardioversion of AF. Therefore, ARBs may represent an important pharmacological supplementation in patients being prepared for cardioversion.

Correction for heart rate is not necessary for QT dispersion in individuals without structural heart disease and patients with ventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: It remains controversial whether QT dispersion should be corrected for heart rate, especially when the limitations of rate correction formulae are considered. We investigated whether incremental atrial pacing affects QT dispersion and the rate-corrected values according to Bazett's formula in individuals without structural heart disease and in patients with history of sustained ventricular tachycardia. METHODS: We studied 32 individuals without structural heart disease (group A), and 16 patients with a history of sustained ventricular tachycardia (group B). QT dispersion and corrected for heart rate QT dispersion using Bazett's formula (QTc dispersion) were calculated in sinus rhythm, and during continuous right atrial pacing for one minute at 100 and 120 beats/min. RESULTS: Interobserver variability was not significant (P > or = 0.10). QT dispersion did not differ at rest between groups A and B and did not change significantly from baseline at any heart rate in both groups. However, QTc dispersion increased significantly with atrial pacing in a similar manner in group A and group B (42 +/- 19 ms at rest vs 53 +/- 23 ms at 120 beats/min, P < 0.001 for group A, 39 +/- 16 ms at rest vs 60 +/- 19 ms at 120 beats/min, P < 0.001 for group B). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that QT dispersion remains unchanged during atrial pacing at heart rates up to 120 beats/min in both individuals without structural heart disease and in patients with a history of sustained ventricular tachycardia. Correction by Bazett's formula results in prolongation of QTc dispersion, yielding values which may be misleading.