RESUMO
Background: Individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on dialysis are at an increased risk of stroke and embolic events especially in the presence of atrial fibrillation (AF). Vitamin K antagonists (VKA), including warfarin, have been used for decades for anticoagulation among CKD patients on dialysis with AF but recent evidence has shown increased bleeding. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have been emerging as an alternative to VKA which, based on several observational cohort studies, are at least as efficacious and safe as VKA. This meta-analysis looked into the safety and efficacy of DOACs compared to VKA among CKD patients on dialysis with non-valvular AF. Methodology: This study used a random-effects meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from their dates of inception to June 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB2 and the certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Results: This meta-analysis showed that DOACs when compared to VKA have no significant difference in terms of risk for major bleeding (RR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.46-1.43), ischemic stroke (RR = 0.5, 95% CI 0.19-1.35), and cardiovascular death (RR = 1.34, 95% CI 0.69-2.60). Discussion: This meta-analysis adds to the growing body of evidence supporting that the use of DOACs has similar efficacy and safety outcomes in CKD patients on dialysis with non-valvular AF patients compared to VKA. The findings need to be replicated in larger and more adequately powered clinical trials in order to ascertain its level of evidence.
RESUMO
Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among infants with a global incidence of 9.5% and a mortality rate of 2.2%. The management of RSV infection is mainly supportive and, aside from emerging monoclonal antibodies, there has been no benefit of most preventive measures. Recent evidence suggests the potential of nirsevimab in preventing RSV infection. Objective: This study aims to determine the efficacy and safety of nirsevimab in preventing RSV infection among infants using a review of relevant clinical trials. Methods: We performed a random-effects meta-analysis among infants comparing nirsevimab injection vs. placebo. MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant trials from inception to June 2022. The selected studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias (RoB2) tool and for quality of evidence using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: Two studies were included. Data analysis showed that among infants, nirsevimab given before the RSV season significantly reduced the risk of medically attended RSV-related infection (RR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.18-0.38) and the risk of hospitalization due to RSV infection (RR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.13-0.47). There was no difference in terms of adverse events leading to death (RR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.20-2.98) and adverse events of special interest (RR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.25-3.38). Conclusions: The use of nirsevimab to prevent RSV infections and hospitalization shows its promising potential, but studies on its cost-effectiveness are lacking. We recommend that further studies be done to look into the applicability and cost-effectiveness of nirsevimab.
