Impact of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin Receptor Blockers on Acute Kidney Injury in Emergency Medical Admissions.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) has been observed in up to 20% of adult hospital admissions. Sepsis, diarrhea and heart failure, all causing reduced effective volume, are considered risk factors for AKI, especially among patients treated with medications that block the Renin-Angiotensin System (RAS), such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). We aimed to determine the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in emergency medical admissions in relation to the use and dosage of ACEi/ARB. METHODS: A single-center observational study conducted in 577 consecutive medical admissions via the Emergency Room (ER) at a University General Hospital in Athens, Greece, between June and July 2018. Patients with incomplete medical records, discharged within 24 h, maintained on chronic renal replacement therapy, admitted to the Cardiology Department or the ICU were excluded. Thus, a total of 309 patients were finally included in this analysis. RESULTS: We compared 86 (28%) patients who presented in the ER with AKI (AKIGroup) with 223 (72%) patients without AKI (non-AKI Group) at the time of admission. Patients in the AKI Group were more frequently male (58% vs. 46%, p = 0.06), with a higher frequency of diarrhea (16% vs. 6%, p = 0.006), edema (15% vs. 6%, p = 0.014) and lower systolic blood pressure (120 (107-135) vs. 126 (113-140), p = 0.007) at presentation, despite higher prevalence of hypertension (64% vs. 47%, p = 0.006). Overall, ACEi/ARB were more likely to have been prescribed in the AKI Group than in the non-AKI Group (49% vs. 28%, p = 0.001). Interestingly, AKI was more frequently observed in patients treated with the target or above target dosage of ACEi/ARB, but not in those receiving lower than the recommended dosage. CONCLUSION: The risk of AKI in emergency medical admissions is higher among users of ACEIs/ARB at target or above target dosages. Physicians should adjust RAS blockade according to estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) and advise their patients to withhold ACEi/ARB in cases of acute illness.

Hyperferritinemia in patients with COVID-19: An opportunity for iron chelation?

Studies from China on COVID-19 revealed that nonsurvivors had cytokine storm with high IL-6 and hyperferritinemia. Iron liberated from necrotic cells may catalyze free radical production and amplify lipid peroxidation causing membrane dysfunction and multiorgan failure. Consequently, iron chelators have been successfully utilized in various experimental and clinical models of cytokine storm and multiorgan damage, such as in ischemia-reperfusion injury, sepsis, and infections. Since viral replication may be influenced by iron accumulation, iron chelation has been proven beneficial in a variety of viral infections, such as HIV-1, hepatitis B virus, Mengovirus, Marburg hemorrhagic fever, Enterovirus 71, and West Nile virus. In this commentary, we elaborate on the idea of considering iron chelation as a therapeutic modality in patients with severe COVID-19 infection. For critically ill patients in the ICU, intravenous deferoxamine would provide sufficient and rapid iron chelation to ameliorate cytokine storm, whereas in less severe cases an oral chelator could prevent the development of excessive inflammatory response.

Competing Effects of Renin Angiotensin System Blockade and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors on Erythropoietin Secretion in Diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Anaemia is a common finding in diabetes, particularly in those patients with albuminuria or renal dysfunction and is associated with impaired erythropoietin (EPO) secretion. This review focuses on mechanisms involved in the regulation of erythropoiesis in diabetic patients in an effort to elucidate the competing effects of the renin angiotensin system (RAS) blockade and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on haemoglobin concentration and hematocrit values. SUMMARY: The RAS shows significant activation in diabetic subjects. Angiotensin II, its active octapeptide, causes renal tubulointerstitial hypoxia, which stimulates hypoxia-inducible factors (HIF) and increases EPO secretion and erythropoiesis. As expected, drugs that inactivate RAS, such as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEi/ARB) are associated with a significant hematocrit-lowering effect and/or anaemia in various clinical conditions, including diabetes. Dual blockade by a combination of ACEi and ARB in diabetic patients achieves a better RAS inhibition, but at the same time a worse drop of haemoglobin concentration. Increased glucose reabsorption by SGLTs in diabetic subjects generates a high-glucose environment in renal tubulointerstitium, which may impair HIF-1, damage renal erythropoietin-producing cells (REPs) and decrease EPO secretion and erythropoiesis. SGLT2 inhibitors, which inhibit glucose reabsorption, may attenuate glucotoxicity in renal tubulointerstitium, allowing REPs to resume their function and increase EPO secretion. Indeed, EPO levels increase within a few weeks after initiation of therapy with all known SGLT2 inhibitors, followed by increased reticulocyte count and a gradual elevation of haemoglobin concentration and hematocrit level, which reach zenith values after 2-3 months. Key Messages: The competing effects of RAS blockade and SGLT2 inhibitors on erythropoiesis may have important clinical implications. The rise of hematocrit values by SGLT2 inhibitors given on top of RAS blockade in recent outcome trials may significantly contribute to the cardiorenal protection attained. The relative contribution of each system to erythropoiesis and outcome remains to be revealed in future studies.

Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system in the cardiorenal syndrome with anaemia: a double-edged sword.

: The term 'cardiorenal syndrome' (CRS) was introduced to describe problems related to the simultaneous existence of heart and renal insufficiency. The prevalence of anaemia in CRS is high and increases the risk of hospitalizations and death. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibition is the cornerstone therapy in cardiovascular and renal medicine. As angiotensin II regulates both glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and erythropoiesis, RAS inhibition can further deteriorate renal function and lower hematocrit or cause anaemia in patients with heart failure. The aim of this review is to explore the relationship among CRS, anemia and administration of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and summarize the evidence suggesting that RAS inhibition may be considered an iatrogenic cause of deterioration of CRS with anemia. It should be emphasized however, that RAS inhibition reduces mortality in both groups with and without worsening of renal function, and therefore, no patient with CRS should be denied an ACEi or ARB trial without careful evaluation.

The role of the renin-angiotensin system in the regulation of erythropoiesis.

The renin-angiotensin system is the major regulator of blood pressure by virtue of controlling vascular resistance and plasma volume. Much less recognition exists for the role of the renin-angiotensin system in regulating erythropoiesis, a biological function critical for oxygen delivery to tissues. In this review, we present evidence that angiotensin II (Ang II) is a physiologically important regulator of erythropoiesis with 2 key actions. First, Ang II is a growth factor of erythroid progenitors and, in cooperation with erythropoietin, increases red blood cell mass. Second, Ang II acts as an erythropoietin secretagogue to maintain increased erythropoietin levels despite increments in hematocrit. Among a multitude of physiologic and pathophysiologic implications, these lines of evidence provide an explanation for the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and Ang II type 1 receptor blockers to decrease hematocrit or cause anemia in various clinical conditions.

Preoperative intravenous hydration confers renoprotection in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing cardiac surgery.

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at risk to develop acute renal failure (ARF) after open heart surgery. This complication is associated with high morbidity, mortality, and cost. Because the ability to concentrate urine is lost early in the progression of CKD, renal patients kept on fluid restriction prior to surgery may develop severe dehydration, a situation consistently found to be one of the most critical risk factors for postoperative ARF. Our goal was to investigate whether intravenous hydration for 12 h prior to cardiac surgery could prevent acute renal injury in patients with CKD. This is a prospective study in a tertiary cardiac surgery center. Forty-five patients admitted for elective open heart surgery with moderate-to-severe CKD, as evidenced by a quantified glomerular filtration rate less than 45 mL/min, were assigned using a 2/1 randomization process, to either receive an intravenous infusion of half-isotonic saline (1 mL/kg/h) for 12 h before the operation (hydration group, n = 30, 29 men, 64 + 1.7 years old), or to be simply kept on fluid restriction (control group, n = 15, 14 men, 64.2 + 2.8 years old). Groups were not different in clinical and intraoperative variables associated with postoperative renal injury. ARF developed in 8 of 15 (53%) patients in the control group, but in only 9 of the 30 (30%) patients in the hydration group. Four patients in the control group (27%), but no one in the hydration group, required dialysis after the operation (P < 0.01). Peak creatinine and blood urea nitrogen values were two to three times higher in the control group than in the hydration group. Preoperative intravenous hydration may ameliorate renal damage in patients with moderate-to-severe renal insufficiency undergoing cardiac surgery.

Posttransplant erythrocytosis.

Posttransplant erythrocytosis (PTE) is defined as a persistently elevated hematocrit to a level greater than 51% after renal transplantation. It occurs in 10% to 15% of graft recipients and usually develops 8 to 24 months after engraftment. Spontaneous remission of established PTE is observed in one fourth of the patients within 2 years from onset, whereas in the remaining three fourths it persists for several years, only to remit after loss of renal function from rejection. Predisposing factors include male gender, retention of native kidneys, smoking, transplant renal artery stenosis, adequate erythropoiesis prior to transplantation, and rejection-free course with well-functioning renal graft. Just as in other forms of erythrocytosis, a substantial number (approximately 60%) of patients with PTE experience malaise, headache, plethora, lethargy, and dizziness. Thromboembolic events occur in 10% to 30% of the cases; 1% to 2% eventually die of associated complications. Posttransplant erythrocytosis results from the combined trophic effect of multiple and interrelated erythropoietic factors. Among them, endogenous erythropoietin appears to play the central role. Persistent erythropoietin secretion from the diseased and chronically ischemic native kidneys does not conform to the normal feedback regulation, thereby establishing a form of "tertiary hypererythropoietinemia." However, erythropoietin levels in most PTE patients still remain within the "normal range," indicating that erythrocytosis finally ensues by the contributory action of additional growth factors on erythroid progenitors, such as angiotensin II, androgens, and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). Inactivation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) by an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, or an angiotensin II type 1 AT1 receptor blocker represents the most effective, safe, and well-tolerated therapeutic modality.

Safety and efficacy of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in chronic dialysis patients.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been recently revived, because cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) appears to worsen the multiple organ dysfunction after conventional CABG. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the off-pump CABG in chronic dialysis patients, we compared the perioperative morbidity and mortality between 15 dialysis patients who underwent off-pump CABG at our center over the past 8 years with that of a concurrent group of 19 patients who underwent conventional CABG. Patients were selected for off-pump CABG only when complete revascularization was technically feasible. We found that off-pump CABG is as safe and effective as conventional CABG in selected dialysis patients. It might even be beneficial, because it is associated with less hematocrit drop and blood product use, a lower catabolic rate, and fewer dialysis requirements after surgery. However, the impact of off-pump technique on the long-term clinical outcome and resource utilization in renal patients requires further investigation.