Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis and the incidence of surgical site infections in elective clean soft tissue surgery of the hand and upper limb: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSI) are the most frequent early complications of hand surgeries. However, the indications still remain uncertain for antibiotic prophylaxis in elective clean soft tissue surgeries of the hand and upper limb. Therefore, a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the impact of antibiotic prophylaxis on the prevention of SSI in these types of surgeries. METHODS: An electronic search was performed in the following databases: MEDLINE/Pubmed, PMC/Pubmed, Web of Science/Clarivate Analytics, Embase/Elsevier, Scopus/Elsevier, BVS/Lilacs, and the Cochrane Library, with no restrictions regarding publication language or date. The primary outcome of interest was the occurrence of SSI following elective clean soft tissue surgeries of the hand and upper limb according to the administration of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis and no antibiotic prophylaxis. Surgeries involving simultaneous bone procedures or orthopedic implants were excluded. Study selection and data extraction were conducted independently by two reviewers. RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I are Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials and non-randomized studies of interventions. The magnitude of the intervention effect was estimated using the relative risk (RR). The meta-analysis was performed with the Review Manager and R software tools, using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model and a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results with p ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 1175 titles, from which 12 articles met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review, and 10 were included in the subsequent meta-analysis. The majority of these studies were nonrandomized intervention trials, exhibiting a moderate risk of bias. According to our review, preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis did not have a statistically significant impact on the incidence of SSI (RR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.91-1.40, p = 0.28). The overall quality of evidence for this outcome was rated as low. Moderate statistical heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 44%), and the prespecified sensitivity analysis highlighted the consistency of the results. CONCLUSIONS: While these results were consistent with the findings from individual studies included in this review, it is important to note that, given the threshold of p ≤ 0.05 for statistical significance, no definitive conclusions can be drawn from the quantitative analysis of the data obtained. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42023417786.

Screening tool development for hand surgery referrals in systemic sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) patients may need hand surgery. OBJECTIVE: To develop a screening tool for rheumatologists to identify potential candidates with systemic sclerosis for hand surgery, optimizing referrals. METHODS: A pilot cross-sectional study from January 2015 to December 2016. SAMPLE SIZE: 51 participants. INCLUSION CRITERIA: ≥ 18 years old, meeting the 2013 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria for SSc and hand impairment. DATA COLLECTED: age, sex, race, disease duration, SSc subtypes, vasodilator use, skin thickness, finger stiffness, presence of Digital Ulcers (DU) and/or calcinosis, presence of Raynaud's Phenomenon (RP) attacks, health status and disability, disease status, pain intensity and functional status of the hands. Data were analyzed by a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: Fulfillment of surgical criteria: 68.8%. The surgical group had higher scores on the HAQ-DI (1.39 vs. 0.96, p = 0.032) and CHFS (25.0 vs. 12.0, p = 0.005) questionnaires, and a higher frequency of DU (91.43% vs. 18.75%, p < 0.0010), calcinosis (60.0% vs. 0.0%, p < 0.001), use of vasodilators (100.0% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.007) and digital stiffness (28.57% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.017). The presence of DU increased the chance of surgical indication by 46.2 times (ORIC 95% = 8.23 to 259.49). The statistical model showed good accuracy (86.3%, p < 0.001), sensitivity (91.4%), and specificity (81.2%). CONCLUSION: The presence of DU in SSc could be used as a screening feature for early identification and referral of potential candidates for hand surgery.

The evaluation of a home-based program for hands in patients with systemic sclerosis.

STUDY DESIGN: This study used a quasi-experimental design where patients were evaluated before and after participation in the self-management program. INTRODUCTION: Hands are commonly affected in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Strategies to maintain or improve hand function are indicated upon diagnosis and throughout the course of the disease. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a home-based program for hands in patients with SSc. METHODS: A home-based self-management program that consisted of concise instructions about SSc and hand exercises was developed and evaluated in a group of patients with SSc during 8 weeks. Primary outcome measures were hand pain (Visual Analogue Scale) and hand function (Cochin Hand Function Scale). Secondary outcome measures were disability (Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire), finger motion (delta finger-to-palm), grip strength, tip and key pinch strength, Raynaud phenomenon and digital ulcers impact, quality of life (Short Form Health Survey). For comparisons between different times analysis of variance for repeated measures was used. To calculate the effect size (ES), the Cohen's test was performed. To evaluate skin moisturizing and warming habits before and after intervention, the McNemar test was used. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ .05. RESULTS: Twenty-two SSc patients (19 women: 3 men; 16 limited scleroderma: 6 diffuse scleroderma) completed the program. Significant improvements were noted for hand pain (3.97 vs 2.21, ES: 0.69), Cochin Hand Function Scale (19.24 vs 12.48, ES: 0.48), Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (0.95 vs 0.48, ES: 1.01), delta finger-to-palm (92.86 vs 106.33, ES: 0.40), grip strength (14.43 vs 19, ES: 0.58), tip pinch strength (2.49 vs 4.18, ES: 1.15), key pinch strength (4.01 vs 5.22, ES: 0.76), Raynaud phenomenon impact (0.94 vs 0.47, ES: 0.75), Short Form Health Survey-role physical (47.38 vs 60.14, ES: 0.61), physical functioning (34.62 vs 61.9, ES: 0.18), social functioning (60.71 vs 75.6, ES: 0.64), bodily pain (50.55 vs 63.38, ES: 0.58), vitality (45.95 vs 62, ES: 2.22), mental health (56.62 vs 72.38, ES: 0.84) moisturizing, and cold avoidance habits. Patients considered the program easy to follow with no adverse effects related to exercises. DISCUSSION: We developed a home based hand care program to be offered to SSc patients. Improvements in hand function, strength, disability, motion, and overall quality of life were independent of age, income, education level, disease duration, and skin score. Our findings support those of other studies that reported the benefits of hand exercises in SSc. Some study limitations include the lack of a control group, the small number of subjects and the short-time follow up. CONCLUSIONS: This home-based program for patients with SSc improved hand pain, function, mobility, and strength at the end of 8 weeks. Patient adherence and sustained efficacy is still to be determined.