Effects of Six Months Training on Physical Capacity and Metaboreflex Activity in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.

Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have an increased systemic vascular resistance (SVR) response during the metaboreflex. It has been hypothesized that this is the consequence of a sedentary lifestyle secondary to MS. The purpose of this study was to discover whether a 6-month training program could reverse this hemodynamic dysregulation. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the following two groups: the intervention group (MSIT, n = 11), who followed an adapted training program; and the control group (MSCTL, n = 10), who continued with their sedentary lifestyle. Cardiovascular response during the metaboreflex was evaluated using the post-exercise muscle ischemia (PEMI) method and during a control exercise recovery (CER) test. The difference in hemodynamic variables such as stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), and SVR between the PEMI and the CER tests was calculated to assess the metaboreflex response. Moreover, physical capacity was measured during a cardiopulmonary test till exhaustion. All tests were repeated after 3 and 6 months (T3 and T6, respectively) from the beginning of the study. The main result was that the MSIT group substantially improved parameters related to physical capacity (+5.31 ± 5.12 ml·min-1/kg in maximal oxygen uptake at T6) in comparison with the MSCTL group (-0.97 ± 4.89 ml·min-1/kg at T6; group effect: p = 0.0004). However, none of the hemodynamic variables changed in response to the metaboreflex activation. It was concluded that a 6-month period of adapted physical training was unable to reverse the hemodynamic dys-regulation in response to metaboreflex activation in these patients.

Metaboreflex activity in multiple sclerosis patients.

PURPOSE: The muscle metaboreflex activation has been shown essential to reach normal hemodynamic response during exercise. It has been demonstrated that patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have impaired autonomic functions and cardiovascular regulation during exercise. However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous research to date has studied the metaboreflex in MS patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the hemodynamic response to metaboreflex activation in patients with MS (n = 43) compared to an age-matched, control group (CTL, n = 21). METHODS: Cardiovascular response during the metaboreflex was evaluated using the post-exercise muscle ischemia (PEMI) method and during a control exercise recovery (CER) test. The difference in hemodynamics between the PEMI and the CER test was calculated and this procedure allowed for the assessment of the metaboreflex response. Hemodynamics was estimated by impedance cardiography. RESULTS: The MS group showed a normal mean blood pressure (MBP) response as compared to the CTL group (+6.5 ± 6.9 vs. +8 ± 6.8 mmHg, respectively), but this response was achieved with an increase in systemic vascular resistance, that was higher in the MS with respect to the CTL group (+137.6 ± 300.5 vs. -14.3 ± 240 dyne · s(-1) cm(-5), respectively). This was the main consequence of the MS group's incapacity to raise the stroke volume (-0.65 ± 10.6 vs. +6.2 ± 12.8 ml, respectively). CONCLUSION: It was concluded that MS patients have an impaired capacity to increase stroke volume (SV) in response to low level metaboreflex, even if they could sustain the MBP response by vasoconstriction. This was probably a consequence of their chronic physical de-conditioning.

Effect of aging on hemodynamic response to metaboreflex activation.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present investigation was to assess the role of aging on the contribution of diastolic function during metaboreflex activation. In particular, it aimed to determine whether age-related impairment in diastolic function would produce a different hemodynamic response in elderly subjects (EG) as compared to young controls (CTL). METHODS: Hemodynamic response to metaboreflex activation obtained by post-exercise muscle ischemia (PEMI) was gathered in 22 EG and 20 healthy CTL. Subjects also performed a control exercise recovery (CER) test to compare data from the PEMI test. RESULTS: The main results showed that the EG group reached higher mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) increment than the CTL group during the PEMI test (+11.2 ± 8.6 vs 6.1 ± 6.4 mmHg in the EG and CTL group, respectively). Moreover, the mechanism by which this response was achieved was different between the two groups. In detail, EG reached the target MAP by increasing systemic vascular resistance (+235.2 ± 315.1 vs -44.4 ± 167.7 dynes s(-1) cm(-5) for the EG and the CTL group, respectively), whereas MAP response in the CTL was the result of an increase in cardiac pre-load (-1.5 ± 11.2 vs 14 ± 13.7 ml in end-diastolic volume for the EG and the CTL group, respectively), which led to a rise in stroke volume and cardiac output. Moreover, early filling peak velocities showed a higher response in the CTL than EG group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that diastolic function is important for normal hemodynamic adjustment during the metaboreflex and to avoid excessive vasoconstriction.