Therapeutic efficacy of the topoisomerase I inhibitor 7-ethyl-10-(4-[1-piperidino]-1-piperidino)-carbonyloxy-camptothecin against pediatric and adult central nervous system tumor xenografts.

Therapy of patients with malignant central nervous system tumors is frequently unsuccessful, reflecting limitations of current surgical, radiotherapeutic, and pharmacotherapeutic treatments. The camptothecin derivative irinotecan (CPT-11) has been shown to possess antitumor activity in phase II trials for patients with carcinoma of the lung, cervix, ovary, colon, or rectum and for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The current study was designed to test the efficacy of the drug against a panel of human tumor xenografts derived from adult and pediatric central nervous system malignancies. Tumors included childhood high-grade gliomas (D-212 MG, D-456 MG), adult high-grade gliomas (D-54 MG, D-245 MG), medulloblastomas (D341 Med, D487 Med), ependymomas (D528 EP, D612 EP), and a rhabdomyosarcoma (TE-671), as well as sublines with demonstrated resistance to busulfan (D-456 MG (BR)), cyclophosphamide (TE-671 CR), procarbazine (D-245 MG (PR)) or melphalan (TE-671 MR), growing subcutaneously and intracranially in athymic nude mice. In replicate experiments, CPT-11 was given at a dosage of 40 mg/kg per dose via intraperitoneal injection in 10% dimethylsulfoxide on days 1-5 and 8-12, which is the dosage lethal to 10% of treated animals. CPT-11 produced statistically significant (P < 0.001) growth delays in all subcutaneous xenografts tested, including those resistant to busulfan, cyclophosphamide, procarbazine, and melphalan, with growth delays ranging from 21.3 days in D487 Med to 90+ days in several tumor lines. Further, tumor regression was evident in every treated animal bearing a subcutaneous tumor, with some xenografts yielding complete tumor regression. Statistically significant (P < 0.001) increases in survival were demonstrated in the two intracranial xenografts-D341 EP (73.0% increase) and D-456 MG (114.2% increase)-treated with CPT-11. These studies demonstrate that, of over 40 drugs evaluated in this laboratory, CPT-11 is the most active against central nervous system xenografts and should be advanced to clinical trial as soon as possible.

Characterization of the mechanisms of busulfan resistance in a human glioblastoma multiforme xenograft.

Busulfan is an alkylating agent commonly used in the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia and in combination with cyclophosphamide in preparation for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Serial treatment of a childhood high-grade glioma xenograft (D-456 MG) with busulfan resulted in a busulfan-resistant xenograft, D-456 MG(BR). Cross-resistance to 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea was seen but not resistance to cyclophosphamide or CPT-11. Cytoplasmic levels of glutathione in D-456 MG(BR) were approximately one-half those found in D-456 MG. This depletion could not be explained by levels of glutathione-S-transferase, or by amplification, rearrangement, or increased levels of transcript of gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase. Furthermore, depletion of glutathione in D-456 MG did not alter busulfan activity. Quantitation of busulfan levels in D-456 MG and D-456 MG(BR) xenografts following treatment of mice at the dose lethal to 10% of the animals demonstrated that significantly lower levels of drug were achieved in D-456 MG(BR). These studies suggest that alterations in drug transport or metabolism of busulfan may play a role in the resistance of D-456 MG(BR) to this alkylator.

Flunarizine enhancement of melphalan activity against drug-sensitive/resistant rhabdomyosarcoma.

Flunarizine, a diphenylpiperazine calcium channel blocker, is known to increase tumor blood flow. It also interferes with calmodulin function, repair of DNA damage and drug resistance associated with P-glycoprotein. Flunarizine was tested for its ability to modulate either cyclophosphamide- or melphalan-induced growth delay for a drug-resistant rhabdomyosarcoma xenograft (TE-671 MR) and the drug-sensitive parent line (TE-671), in which P-glycoprotein is not involved in the mechanism of drug resistance. Tumour blood flow was increased by 30% after a flunarizine dose of 4 mg kg-1, but no modification in growth delay was induced by melphalan (12 mg kg-1). In contrast, a 60 mg kg-1 dose of flunarizine had no effect on tumour blood flow, but the same dose created significant enhancement in melphalan-induced tumour regrowth delay in both tumour lines. The dose-modifying factor for flunarizine as an adjuvant to melphalan was approximately 2 for both tumour lines. Although blood flow measurements were not performed with the combination of flunarizine and melphalan, the results from flunarizine alone suggested that augmentation of melphalan cytotoxicity is not mediated by changes in blood flow. In contrast, flunarizine did not affect drug sensitivity to cyclophosphamide in groups of animals bearing the drug-sensitive parent tumour line. These results suggest that the mechanism of drug sensitivity modification by flunarizine is not related to modification of tumour blood flow, but may be mediated by modification of transport mechanisms that are differentially responsible for cellular uptake and retention of melphalan as compared with cyclophosphamide.