Sport injury prevention in individuals with chronic ankle instability: Fascial Manipulation® versus control group: A randomized controlled trial.

Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is one of the most common syndromes that occurs following an initial ankle sprain. Sprains are often correlated with recurrent sprains, loss of range of motion (ROM) and deficits in proprioception and postural control. The objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness of Fascial Manipulation® (FM) as a preventative measure in semi-professional athletes with CAI, and to monitor the symptomatology, equilibrium and ROM of the injured ankle. A single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted in the rehabilitation department of a medical centre. Twenty-nine semi-professional male footballers were recruited. Nine subjects with no previous symptomatology, were assigned to a baseline group, twenty symptomatic subjects were randomized into either the study or the control group. All three groups followed a specific training program. The control group followed normal training protocols and received standard medical care. The study group received an additional three FM treatment sessions. Symptomatology and ROM outcomes were recorded for all players at baseline, before each treatment for the treatment group, and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups. At one year, an additional follow-up on was performed via phone. Four severe ankle traumas and one mild ankle trauma were reported in the control group during the trial period. The 6-month outcomes in the study group showed statistically significant improvements. The 1-year follow-up reported the absence of any reported trauma in the study group. FM was effective in improving ROM and symptomatology in footballers with CAI. FM intervention was effective in preventing injury in the study sample.

Fascial Manipulation® for persistent knee pain following ACL and meniscus repair.

Fascial Manipulation® (FM) is a manual therapy approach for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain. Anomalous fascial tension is common following surgery due to surgical scar, inadequate mobility and fear of movement. Fascial tension may result in pain and loss of mobility. This case report aims at investigating the effectiveness of FM® on pain and function in a patient following knee surgery. A 32 years old male patient, with persisting knee pain following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (hamstring graft) and meniscal repair, underwent the systematic FM® assessment process, the selected centers of coordination of myofascial units were treated. Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire was obtained prior treatment and after 4 treatment sessions. Results showed clinically significant improvements in all subscales of KOOS after 4 weeks, the effect was maintained in subsequent follow-ups at 3 months, 6 months, one year and two years.

Fascial Manipulation Associated With Standard Care Compared to Only Standard Postsurgical Care for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Postsurgical physiotherapy programs after total hip arthroplasty (THA) show important differences between types and numbers of treatment sessions. To increase functional recovery in postsurgical patients, manual therapy can be added to traditional physiotherapy programs. Fascial manipulation (FM) has been demonstrated to be effective in decreasing pain and increasing muscular capacity. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of FM when added to a standard protocol of care. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Rehabilitation center. PATIENTS: A total of 51 patients were recruited after total hip arthroplasty. Inclusion criteria were first THA surgery, posterior-lateral access, and onset of pain within a maximum 2 years. Exclusion criteria were previous hip or knee prosthesis, congenital hip dysplasia, elective THA secondary to trauma, real leg-length discrepancy (≥1.5 cm), cognitive impairment, concomitant rheumatic pathology in acute phase, and serious comorbidities such as cardiac, respiratory, and/or neuromuscular pathologies. METHODS: Patients were randomized into 2 groups; both followed a standard protocol based on 2 daily sessions of active exercises for 45 minutes. In the study group, 2 sessions were replaced by FM. The clinical trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02576028). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional outcome measures were collected before and after treatment and at the end of the rehabilitation program. The measures included the Harris Hip Score; Timed Up-and-Go test; articular range of motion in abduction, flexion, extension, and bilateral external rotation with heels together; and verbal numerical scale. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were observed in degrees of flexion between the study and control group with 25.4 (±11.3) and 18.7 (±9.5), respectively (P = .04); for abduction with 16.8 (±7.0) and 11.1 (±6.1), respectively (P = .005); for extension with 16.2 (±4.9) and 9.3 (±3.8), respectively (P = .001); for bilateral external rotation with heels together with 8.3 (±4.3) and 5.5 (±4.6), respectively (P = .04); for the Harris Hip Score 23.3 (±8.9) and 14.5 (±8.5), respectively (P = .002); and for verbal numerical scale score 1.1 (±2.1) and 0.5 (±1.1), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that 2 FM sessions are able to significantly improve several functional outcomes in patients compared to usual treatment after THA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.