New rehabilitation models for neurologic inpatients in Brazil.

PURPOSE: To describe the effects of a rehabilitation program in a neurological inpatient unit in terms of independence for activities of daily living and return to work. METHOD: Retrospective study with 148 adults with stroke, traumatic brain injury (TBI), spinal cord injury, and Guillain-Barré syndrome admitted as rehabilitation inpatients within a 1-year period for hospitalization at the Instituto de Reabilitação Lucy Montoro, Brazil. According to their diagnostic groups, subjects undergone semi-standardized models of intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation for 4-6 weeks. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Modified Rankin scale (Rankin), and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS Subjects were evaluated at admission, discharge, and 6 months after discharge. RESULTS: Improvement in motor FIM™, Rankin and GOS was observed in all groups. Cognitive FIM increase was less evident in TBI patients. After 6 months, 37.6% of patients were unemployed, 34% underwent outpatient rehabilitation, and 65.2% maintained gains. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report on the effects from an inpatients rehabilitation model in Brazil. After a short intensive rehabilitation, there were motor and cognitive gains in all groups. Heterogeneity in functional gains suggests more individualized programs may be indicated. Controlled studies are required with larger samples to compare inpatient and outpatient programs.

Brazilian version of the Functional Assessment Measure: cross-cultural adaptation and reliability evaluation.

The objective of this prospective study was to perform a cross-cultural adaptation of the Functional Assessment Measure (FAM) into Brazilian Portuguese, and to assess the test-retest reliability. The instrument was translated, back-translated, pretested, and reviewed by a committee. The Brazilian version was assessed in 61 brain-injury patients. Intrarater and interrater reliability was verified by a test-retest procedure (intraclass correlation). Intrarater reliability was moderate-to-excellent; interrater reliability was moderate-to-excellent, with the exception of one item. The Brazilian version of the FAM has acceptable test-retest reliability. Results suggest the use of the Brazilian version of the FAM in the Brazilian population, for disability evaluation and outcome assessment. Further research is required to evaluate the psychometric properties of the scale.