Ultra-low dose computed tomography protocols using spectral shaping for lung cancer screening: Comparison with low-dose for volumetric LungRADS classification.

PURPOSE: To compare Low-Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT) with four different Ultra-Low-Dose Computed Tomography (ULDCT) protocols for PN classification according to the Lung Reporting and Data System (LungRADS). METHODS: Three hundred sixty-one participants of an ongoing lung cancer screening (LCS) underwent single-breath-hold double chest Computed Tomography (CT), including LDCT (120kVp, 25mAs; CTDIvol 1,62 mGy) and one ULDCT among: fully automated exposure control ("ULDCT1"); fixed tube-voltage and current according to patient size ("ULDCT2"); hybrid approach with fixed tube-voltage ("ULDCT3") and tube current automated exposure control ("ULDCT4"). Two radiologists (R1, R2) assessed LungRADS 2022 categories on LDCT, and then after 2 weeks on ULDCT using two different kernels (R1: Qr49ADMIRE 4; R2: Br49ADMIRE 3). Intra-subject agreement for LungRADS categories between LDCT and ULDCT was measured by the k-Cohen Index with Fleiss-Cohen weights. RESULTS: LDCT-dominant PNs were detected in ULDCT in 87 % of cases on Qr49ADMIRE 4 and 88 % on Br49ADMIRE 3. The intra-subject agreement was: κULDCT1 = 0.89 [95 %CI 0.82-0.96]; κULDCT2 = 0.90 [0.81-0.98]; κULDCT3 = 0.91 [0.84-0.99]; κULDCT4 = 0.88 [0.78-0.97] on Qr49ADMIRE 4, and κULDCT1 = 0.88 [0.80-0.95]; κULDCT2 = 0.91 [0.86-0.96]; κULDCT3 = 0.87 [0.78-0.95]; and κULDCT4 = 0.88 [0.82-0.94] on Br49ADMIRE 3. LDCT classified as LungRADS 4B were correctly identified as LungRADS 4B at ULDCT3, with the lowest radiation exposure among the tested protocols (median effective doses were 0.31, 0.36, 0.27 and 0.37 mSv for ULDCT1, ULDCT2, ULDCT3, and ULDCT4, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: ULDCT by spectral shaping allows the detection and characterization of PNs with an excellent agreement with LDCT and can be proposed as a feasible approach in LCS.

Volumetric Measurements in Lung Cancer Screening Reduces Unnecessary Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scans: Results from a Single-Center Prospective Trial on 4119 Subjects.

This study aims to compare the low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) outcome and volume-doubling time (VDT) derived from the measured volume (MV) and estimated volume (EV) of pulmonary nodules (PNs) detected in a single-center lung cancer screening trial. MV, EV and VDT were obtained for prevalent pulmonary nodules detected at the baseline round of the bioMILD trial. The LDCT outcome (based on bioMILD thresholds) and VDT categories were simulated on PN- and screenee-based analyses. A weighted Cohen's kappa test was used to assess the agreement between diagnostic categories as per MV and EV, and 1583 screenees displayed 2715 pulmonary nodules. In the PN-based analysis, 40.1% PNs were included in different LDCT categories when measured by MV or EV. The agreements between MV and EV were moderate (κ = 0.49) and fair (κ = 0.37) for the LDCT outcome and VDT categories, respectively. In the screenee-based analysis, 46% pulmonary nodules were included in different LDCT categories when measured by MV or EV. The agreements between MV and EV were moderate (κ = 0.52) and fair (κ = 0.34) for the LDCT outcome and VDT categories, respectively. Within a simulated lung cancer screening based on a recommendation by estimated volumetry, the number of LDCTs performed for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules was higher compared with in prospective volumetric management.

FNA and CNB in the diagnosis of pulmonary lesions: a single-center experience on 665 patients, comparison between two periods.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic yield and complication rate of 2 different biopsy techniques (fine-needle aspiration, FNA, and core-needle biopsy, CNB) in the diagnosis of pulmonary lesions in 2 distinct periods, 2010-2012 and 2013-2015. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the results of 691 CT-guided lung biopsies in 665 patients who were divided into 2 groups: cohort 1 (January 2010 to December 2012) was composed of 271 consecutive patients with 284 procedures either by FNA or CNB; cohort 2 (January 2013 to December 2015) was composed of 394 patients with 407 CNBs. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression modeling was used for selected outcomes including diagnostic yield, bleeding and pneumothorax. RESULTS: Cohort 1 comprised 165 men and 106 women (mean age 68.5 years) with 180 FNAs and 104 CNBs; cohort 2 comprised 229 men and 165 women (mean age 66.4 years) with 407 CNBs. The diagnostic yield increased in cohort 2 with respect to cohort 1. There was a slight increase in CT procedure complications (pneumothorax and bleeding) from cohort 1 to cohort 2. The overall risk of complications was greater for lesions ≤20 mm and for lesions at >20 mm distance from the pleura. CONCLUSIONS: CT-guided CNB had a higher diagnostic yield than discretional use of either FNA or CNB; there was a slight but acceptable increase in complication rates.