Valoración de la fragilidad en la persona con diabetes mellitus tipo 2: análisis de expertos / Assessment of frailty in the person with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Expert analysis

Introducción Las personas con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 (DM2) tienen una prevalencia de fragilidad que se estima entre 3 y 5 veces mayor que aquellos que no la padecen, sin embargo, no existe un consenso claro sobre el diagnóstico y manejo clínico durante el itinerario de la persona frágil con DM2. Objetivos El objetivo principal de este estudio es identificar las limitaciones y necesidades actuales en el uso del concepto de fragilidad en personas con DM2 (PCDM2), así como definir y evaluar, según su importancia y novedad, las dimensiones que podrían incluirse en su valoración clínica de rutina. Métodos Se llevó a cabo un proceso basado en la técnica de grupo nominal con la participación de un equipo multidisciplinario de 8 profesionales de la salud que trabajan en diferentes hospitales de España. Resultados Se identificaron y clasificaron según su importancia un total de 8 limitaciones en la evaluación de la fragilidad en PCDM2, así como 10 necesidades no satisfechas relacionadas con el diagnóstico y seguimiento de la enfermedad. Además, se identificaron 7 dimensiones que consideramos que deben incluirse en la definición de la persona frágil con DM2, ordenadas por importancia y novedad. Conclusiones El presente artículo podría lograr aumentar el conocimiento y uso en la comunidad médica del concepto de fragilidad en la persona con DM2 y desembocar en un futuro proyecto que logre realizar, de manera consensuada, una definición de fragilidad adaptada a este colectivo (AU)

Introduction People with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) have a higher prevalence of frailty compared to those without DM2. However, there is a lack of consensus on the diagnosis and clinical management of frail individuals with DM2. Objectives This study aims to identify limitations and current needs in the use of the frailty concept in PCDM2 (people with DM2), as well as define and evaluate the dimensions that should be included in its routine clinical assessment. Methods A multidisciplinary team of eight health professionals from different hospitals in Spain participated in a process based on the nominal group technique. Results The study identified eight limitations in the assessment of frailty in PCDM2, categorized by importance, and 10 unmet needs related to the diagnosis and follow-up of the disease. Additionally, seven dimensions were identified that should be included in the definition of frail individuals with DM2, prioritized by importance and novelty. Conclusions This article aims to increase knowledge and usage of the frailty concept in individuals with DM2 within the medical community. It also suggests the potential for future projects to develop a consensus definition of frailty tailored to this specific group (AU)

Assessment of frailty in the person with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Expert analysis.

INTRODUCTION: People with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) have a higher prevalence of frailty compared to those without DM2. However, there is a lack of consensus on the diagnosis and clinical management of frail individuals with DM2. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to identify limitations and current needs in the use of the frailty concept in PCDM2 (people with DM2), as well as define and evaluate the dimensions that should be included in its routine clinical assessment. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team of eight health professionals from different hospitals in Spain participated in a process based on the nominal group technique. RESULTS: The study identified eight limitations in the assessment of frailty in PCDM2, categorized by importance, and 10 unmet needs related to the diagnosis and follow-up of the disease. Additionally, seven dimensions were identified that should be included in the definition of frail individuals with DM2, prioritized by importance and novelty. CONCLUSIONS: This article aims to increase knowledge and usage of the frailty concept in individuals with DM2 within the medical community. It also suggests the potential for future projects to develop a consensus definition of frailty tailored to this specific group.

[Diabetic ketoacidosis in patients with soft-tissue necrotizing infections]. / Cetoacidosis diabética en pacientes con infecciones necrosantes de tejidos blandos.

Necrotizing soft tissue infection is an uncommon and severe infection of the skin, subcutaneous tissue and superficial fascia which is usually accompanied by severe systemic toxicity. These infections occur more frequently in diabetics and are associated with higher morbidity and mortality rate. The prognosis of necrotizing fasciitis is known to be dependent on early recognition and treatment. Therefore, clinical awareness is important to avoid fatal outcome in patients with diabetes mellffus. We present three patients with undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in whom hyperglycaemia may have facilffated me development of necrotizing tissue infection, which in tum may have precipitated diabetic ketoacidosis in patients who rarely develop this metabolic complication.

Cetoacidosis diabética en pacientes con infecciones necrosantes de tejidos blandos / Diabetic ketoacidosis in patients with necrotizing soft tissue infections

Las infecciones necrosantes de tejidos blandos son afecciones raras y frecuentemente graves que afectan a la piel, tejido celular subcutáneo y aponeurosis superficial. Se producen con más frecuencia entre la población diabética y en ella se asocian a una mayor morbi-mortalidad. El pronóstico de la enfermedad depende de la instauración de un diagnóstico y tratamiento precoz, por lo que la sospecha clínica inicial es importante para evitar un desenlace fatal sobre todo en pacientes con diabetes mellitus. Se presentan tres pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 desconocida hasta la aparición del proceso infeccioso en los que el deficiente control metabólico favorece la aparición de la infección y esta a su vez sirve para desencadenar una cetoacidosis diabética en un tipo de diabetes que es raramente propensa a la aparición de esta complicación metabólica (AU)

[The metabolic control of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and diabetic nephropathy]. / Control metabólico de la diabetes mellitus insulinodependiente y nefropatía diabética.

Long-term complications of Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (IDDM) have been associated with several risk factors, particularly the degree of metabolic control and evolution time of the disease. A study was conducted with 219 randomly selected patients with IDDM at our clinic; evolutive, clinical and analytical parameters were assessed and conventional or multiple insulin therapy was evaluated. The classification of glycated hemoglobin (Hb A1c) in quartiles demonstrated a relatively higher incidence of diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy in the upper quartiles versus the lower quartile (p < 0.05). Likewise, patients with multiple insulin therapy had lower retinopathy (24.5% vs. 50.6, p < 0.001) and nephropathy rates (12.9% vs. 26.6%, p < 0.05) compared with those following a conventional insulin therapy. The multivariate analysis showed a statistically significant regression model (p < 0.001) for microalbuminuria level in patients with no established nephropathy; in these patients, the evolution time of IDDM and their Hb A1c level showed a positive independent association, and the use of multiple insulin therapy was a protective factor. The regression analysis of microalbuminuria levels compared with glycated hemoglobin in patients with no established nephropathy showed a value for Hb A1c of 9% as a break-point; from this point upwards microalbuminuria levels increased more markedly. The multivariate analysis here presented can help identify the presence of microalbuminuria in the pathological range in patients with IDDM followed at a hospital clinic from feasible clinical variables (evolution time, glycated hemoglobin level, program of insulin therapy used) establishing a metabolic objective which helps prevent the development of this complication.