Is Familial Nonmedullary Thyroid Cancer A More Aggressive Type of Thyroid Cancer?

OBJECTIVES: Familial non-medullary thyroid cancer (FNMTC) is a distinct entity, increasingly diagnosed. By lacking an accurate genetic diagnostic test, its diagnosis is currently clinically based, with an ongoing debate over whether it has a more aggressive clinical behavior than sporadic non-medullary thyroid cancer (SNMTC). We seek to compare in this study, the clinicopathological variables, and the outcome of FNMTC versus SNMTC patients. METHODS: We retrospectively searched a database of 465 patients that underwent thyroidectomy at Assaf Harofeh Medical Center (91.4% between 1990 and 2019) for demographics, risk factors, medical history, diagnostic workup, primary treatment, follow-up, and disease outcome data. We compared 47 FNMTC versus 321 SNMTC patients, and FNMTC patients with ≥2 (n = 34) versus ≥3 (n = 13) first-relative affected members. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in demographics, histopathology, TNM stage, treatment, and disease outcome between the FNMTC and SNMTC groups. The T2 and T4 tumor stage in the ≥3-member group were 25% and 8.3% compared to 0% and 0% in the two-member group (P = .02 and P = ns, respectively). Also, LN involvement was significantly higher in the ≥3-member group (61.6% vs. 24.2%, respectively; P = .036). CONCLUSION: FNMTC is not a more aggressive disease than SNMTC, but this may not apply for the ≥3-affected-relatives group. A large multicenter study including only families with three or more affected relatives is needed. Until then, a family history of NMTC should not be overlooked. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3/5 Laryngoscope, 131:E677-E681, 2021.

The Risk of Bone Fractures in Post-Poliomyelitis Patients Transitioning to Middle Adulthood.

ObjectiveWhile osteoporotic fractures are reported in up to 40% of adults with post-poliomyelitis syndrome (PPS), clinical guidelines regarding bone mineral density (BMD) and indications for treatment are scarce. We investigated the characteristics of PPS patients, focusing on fractures and osteoporosis as the primary outcomes. METHODS: A cross-sectional retrospective data analysis from medical records of 204 PPS patients regarding their clinical characteristics and long-term outcome, with emphasis on bone metabolism status. RESULTS: Our cohort included 53% women; mean age was 65 years at study entry and 1.7 years at the diagnosis of acute poliomyelitis. The lower limb was involved in 97.5% of patients, and the BMD in the affected limb tended to be lower than the unaffected, with a mean T-score of -1.64 vs. -1.19, respectively (P = .06). Recurrent falls were documented in 39.2% of patients, and osteoporosis in 20.6%, being more frequent in women (P = .003) and patients with fractures (P = .002). At least one fracture occurred in 52.2% of patients, and more than one in 40.3%. The median age for the first fracture was 57.5 years (range, 30 to 83 years), and most fractures occurred in the affected limb (73.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Underdiagnosis and delayed treatment of osteoporosis in late-adulthood post-poliomyelitis patients underlie the need for comprehensive clinical guidelines to manage these patients, including recommendations on bone health assessment, medical treatment, and their inclusion as a high-risk group for bone fractures.