Doppler Echocardiographic Phenotypes in Suspected 'Severe' Aortic Stenosis: Matrix-Based Approach to Diagnosis and Management.

BACKGROUND: Among patients with suspected severe aortic stenosis (AS), Doppler echocardiographic (DE) data are often discordant, and further analysis is required for accurate diagnosis and optimal management. In this study, an automated matrix-based approach was applied to an echocardiographic database of patients with AS that identified 5 discrete echocardiographic data patterns, 1 concordant and 4 discordant, each reflecting a particular pathophysiology/measurement error that guides further workup and management. METHODS: A primary/discovery cohort of consecutive echocardiographic studies with at least 1 DE parameter of severe AS and analogous data from an independent secondary/validation cohort were retrospectively analyzed. Parameter thresholds for inclusion were aortic valve area (AVA) <1.0 cm2, transaortic mean gradient (MG) ≥ 40 mmHg, and/or transaortic peak velocity (PV) ≥ 4.0 m/sec. Doppler velocity index (DVI) was also determined. Logic provided by an in-line SQL query embedded within the database was used to assign each patient to 1 of 5 discrete matrix patterns, each reflecting 1 or more specific pathophysiologies. Feasibility of automated pattern-driven triage of discordant cases was also evaluated. RESULTS: In both cohorts, data from each patient fitted only 1 data pattern. Of the 4,643 primary cohort patients, 39% had concordant parameters for severe AS and DVI <0.30 (pattern 1); 35% had AVA < 1.0 cm2, MG < 40 mm Hg, PV < 4 m/sec, DVI < 0.30 (pattern 2); 9% had MG ≥ 40 mmHg and/or PV ≥ 4 m/sec, DVI > 0.30 (pattern 3); 10% had AVA < 1.0 cm2, MG < 40 mmHg, PV < 4 m/sec, DVI >0.30 (pattern 4); and 7% had MG > 40 mmHg and/or PV ≥ 4 m/sec, AVA > 1.0 cm2, DVI < 0.30 (pattern 5). Findings were validated among the 387 secondary cohort patients in whom pattern distribution was remarkably similar. CONCLUSIONS: Matrix-based pattern recognition permits automated in-line identification of specific pathophysiology and/or measurement error among patients with suspected severe AS and discordant DE data.

Comparative Outcomes of TAVR in Mixed Aortic Valve Disease and Aortic Stenosis: A Meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a suitable alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for the treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS). A high proportion of patients with AS have mixed aortic valve disease (MAVD) with mild or more concurrent aortic regurgitation (AR). Differential outcomes of TAVR among patients with AS and MAVD have not been well characterized. We compared 1-year mortalities following TAVR among patients with MAVD and AS. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of studies published in PubMed/Medline. The primary outcome was 1-year all-cause mortality following TAVR among patients with MAVD vs. AS. Secondary endpoints were: (1) incidence of AR within 30 days following TAVR (post TAVR AR); and (2) 1-year all-cause mortality within each group stratified according to severity of post TAVR AR. RESULTS: Nine studies involving 9505 participants were included in the analysis. At 1 year following TAVR, mortality was lower in MAVD than in AS; HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.98. The mortality advantage increased when pre-TAVR AR was moderate or more; HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.99. The mortality advantage was attenuated after correction for publication bias. There was a higher risk of post TAVR AR in the MAVD group; OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.20-1.90 but the impact on mortality of moderate vs. mild post TAVR AR was greater among patients with AS than in patients with MAVD HR 1.67 95% CI 0.89-3.14 vs. 0.93 95% CI 0.47-1.85. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MAVD have similar or improved survival 1 year after TAVR compared to those with AS.

Hemodynamic Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of permanent His bundle and biventricular pacing after AV nodal ablation.

placing after atrioventricular (AV) nodal ablation for permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) may include cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with either His bundle pacing (HBP) or biventricular pacing (BVP), or conventional single site right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP). To determine the relationship between pacing method and hemodynamic outcome, we used Doppler echocardiographic methods to evaluate left ventricular (LV) hemodynamics after AV nodal ablation and either HBP, BVP, or RVAP. Method: 20 patients were evaluated > 6 months after AV nodal ablation, 10 each with chronic HBP or BVP, and all with RVAP lead. Doppler echocardiography was used to measure 3 parameters indicative of CRT: 1) LV dP/dt, 2) the LV pre-ejection interval, and 3) myocardial performance index, relative to intra-patient RVAP. Results: Primary endpoint of LV dP/dt on average improved by > 17% with both HBP and BVP, compared to RVAP. HBP but not BVP, had improvement across all three parameters. Conclusion: HBP provides LV electromechanical synchrony across multiple echo Doppler parameters. Both HBP and BVP were hemodynamically superior to RVAP following AV nodal ablation.