Thoracic complications of illicit drug use: an organ system approach.

Illicit drug use constitutes a major health problem and may be associated with various thoracic complications. These complications vary depending on the specific drug used and the route of administration. Commonly abused drugs that may play a role in causing thoracic disease include cocaine, opiates, and methamphetamine derivatives. Intravenously abused oral medications may contain filler agents that may be responsible for disease. Thoracic complications may be categorized as pulmonary, pleural, mediastinal, cardiovascular, and chest wall complications. Pulmonary complications of drug abuse include pneumonia, cardiogenic edema, acute lung injury, pulmonary hemorrhage, and aspiration pneumonia. Filler agents such as talc may result in panacinar emphysema or high-attenuation upper-lobe conglomerate masses. The primary pleural complication of illicit drug use is pneumothorax. Mediastinal and cardiovascular complications of illicit drug use include pneumomediastinum, cardiomyopathy, myocardial infarction, aortic dissection, and injection-related pseudoaneurysms. Chest wall complications include diskitis and vertebral osteomyelitis, epidural abscess, necrotizing fasciitis, costochondritis, and septic arthritis. Categorization of thoracic complications of illicit drug use may facilitate understanding of these disorders and allow accurate diagnosis.

Evaluation of active bleeding into hematomas by technetium-99m red blood cell scintigraphy before angiography.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of technetium-99m red blood cell (Tc-99m RBC) scintigraphy in the diagnosis of active hemorrhage into large intra-abdominal hematomas before arteriography. METHODS: This retrospective case series describes four patients (1 man and 3 women) with large abdominal wall and retroperitoneal hematomas confirmed by computed tomography who underwent Tc-99m RBC scintigraphy before angiography. Arterial transcatheter embolization was performed if active hemorrhage was found. RESULTS: Three of the patients had positive findings on Tc-99m RBC scans, which showed spreading of the labeled erythrocytes into the hematoma space. Positive scintigraphy was diagnostic for active hemorrhage and helped localize the bleeding sites. Angiography confirmed the diagnosis in all patients with positive scintigraphy and ruled out active bleeding in the patient with a negative Tc-99m-labeled RBC scan. CONCLUSION: Tc-99m RBC scintigraphy appears to be sensitive and accurate in detecting active hemorrhage into intra-abdominal hematomas.

Presentation, diagnosis, and management of arterial mycotic pseudoaneurysms in injection drug users.

Injection drug users frequently present with abscess, cellulitis, and endocarditis. The development of arterial mycotic pseudoaneurysm (AMP) as a sequela of injection drug use, however, is much less frequently reported. We undertook a study to determine the prevalence and presenting clinical characteristics of AMP, utilizing a retrospective review of all emergency department cases seen at one city public hospital for the 5-year period 1994-1999. Initial evaluation included physical examination, CT scan, ultrasound, and/or angiography. There were 7,795 patient visits for complications of injection drug use; 11 patients had AMP (0.14%). AMP involved the brachial (n = 5), subclavian (n = 2), radial (n = 2), femoral (n = 1) and popliteal arteries (n = 1). Fever was absent in the majority of patients (7/11). Either pulsatility or a mass was noted in three cases, and both were seen in 6/11 (54%). AMP was not initially suspected in three cases, which were treated as abscesses and surgically incised, resulting in arterial rupture. The annual prevalence of AMP in the presenting population was estimated to be 0.03%. However, a high index of suspicion for AMP should be maintained with injection drug users presenting with a mass or pulsatility over an artery, as there is risk of rupture, rapid exsanguination, and distal embolization.

Helical CT with sagittal and coronal reconstructions: accuracy for detection of diaphragmatic injury.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of our study were to determine the accuracy of single-detector helical CT (including coronal and sagittal reconstructions) for the diagnosis of traumatic diaphragmatic injury, establish measurements for the thickness of the normal diaphragmatic crus, and describe an additional sign of diaphragmatic injury: active arterial extravasation of contrast material at the level of the diaphragm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CT scans of 25 patients with surgically proven diaphragmatic injury and 22 patients with surgically confirmed uninjured diaphragms were blindly reviewed by five thoracic radiologists. Sagittal and coronal reconstructions were performed for 20 of the 25 patients with a proven diaphragmatic injury and for all the patients without a diaphragmatic injury. Scans were evaluated for findings suggestive of diaphragmatic injury and for associated injuries. Reviewers scored the usefulness of the reconstructed images for establishing the final diagnosis. Measurements of the right and left crura were performed to establish a threshold measurement that would enable radiologists to discriminate between a normal diaphragm and an injured diaphragm. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of helical CT were 84%, 77%, 81%, 81%, and 83%, respectively. Scans showing active arterial extravasation of contrast material enabled reviewers to correctly identify diaphragmatic injury in two patients. Reconstructed images confirmed the correct diagnosis in three patients but supported an incorrect diagnosis in two. The mean thickness of the diaphragmatic crura (right and left) was not significantly greater in patients with an injured diaphragm than in those with an uninjured diaphragm. CONCLUSION: Helical CT shows good sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the diagnosis of diaphragmatic injury. Coronal and sagittal reconstructions are of limited use in establishing or refuting this diagnosis. Active arterial extravasation of contrast material near the diaphragm should raise suspicion for injury. Crus measurements cannot be used to reliably distinguish between injured and uninjured diaphragms.