Impact of institutional prophylaxis guidelines on rates of pediatric venous thromboembolism following trauma-A multicenter study from the pediatric trauma society research committee.

BACKGROUND: A paucity of data exists with regard to the incidence, management, and outcomes of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in injured children. We sought to determine the impact of institutional chemoprophylaxis guidelines on VTE rates in a pediatric trauma population. METHODS: A retrospective review of injured children (≤15 years) admitted between 2009 and 2018 at 10 pediatric trauma centers was performed. Data were gathered from institutional trauma registries and dedicated chart review. The institutions were surveyed as to whether they had chemoprophylaxis guidelines in place for high-risk pediatric trauma patients, and outcomes were compared based on the presence of guidelines using χ 2 analysis ( p < 0.05). RESULTS: There were 45,202 patients evaluated during the study period. Three institutions (28,359 patients, 63%) had established chemoprophylaxis policies during the study period ("Guidelines"); the other seven centers (16,843 patients, 37%) had no such guidelines ("Standard"). There were significantly lower rates of VTE in the Guidelines group, but these patients also had significantly fewer risk factors. Among critically injured children with similar clinical presentations, there was no difference in VTE rate. Specifically within the Guidelines group, 30 children developed VTE. The majority (17/30) were actually not indicated for chemoprophylaxis based on institutional guidelines. Still, despite protocols only one VTE patient in the guidelines group who was indicated for intervention ended up receiving chemoprophylaxis prior to diagnosis. No consistent ultrasound screening protocol was in place at any institution during the study. CONCLUSION: The presence of an institutional policy to guide chemoprophylaxis for injured children is associated with a decreased overall frequency of VTE, but this disappears when controlling for patient factors. However, the overall efficacy is impacted by a combination of deficits in guideline compliance and structure. Further prospective data are needed to help determine the ideal role for chemoprophylaxis and protocols in pediatric trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Utilization of Machine Learning Approaches to Predict Mortality in Pediatric Warzone Casualties.

BACKGROUND: Identification of pediatric trauma patients at the highest risk for death may promote optimization of care. This becomes increasingly important in austere settings with constrained medical capabilities. This study aimed to develop and validate predictive models using supervised machine learning (ML) techniques to identify pediatric warzone trauma patients at the highest risk for mortality. METHODS: Supervised learning approaches using logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), neural network (NN), and random forest (RF) models were generated from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry, 2008-2016. Models were tested and compared to determine the optimal algorithm for mortality. RESULTS: A total of 2,007 patients (79% male, median age range 7-12 years old, 62.5% sustaining penetrating injury) met the inclusion criteria. Severe injury (Injury Severity Score > 15) was noted in 32.4% of patients, while overall mortality was 7.13%. The RF and SVM models displayed recall values of .9507 and .9150, while LR and NN displayed values of .8912 and .8895, respectively. Random forest (RF) outperformed LR, SVM, and NN on receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis demonstrating an area under the ROC of .9752 versus .9252, .9383, and .8748, respectively. CONCLUSION: Machine learning (ML) techniques may prove useful in identifying those at the highest risk for mortality within pediatric trauma patients from combat zones. Incorporation of advanced computational algorithms should be further explored to optimize and supplement the diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making process.

Prognostic Role of Lymph Node Sampling in Adolescent and Young Adults With Fibrolamellar Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is rare among adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients, and resection or transplant remains the only curative therapy. The role of lymph node (LN) sampling is not well-defined. The aim of this study was to describe practice patterns, as well as investigate the impact of LN sampling on survival outcomes in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using the 2004-2018 National Cancer Database (NCDB) was performed. Patients ≤21 y old with nonmetastatic HCC who underwent liver resection or transplant were evaluated. Clinical features of patients who underwent LN sampling were compared to those who did not, and univariable and multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate independent predictive factors of node positivity. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox Proportional Hazard Survival Regression. RESULTS: A total of 262 AYA patients with HCC were identified, of whom 137 (52%) underwent LN sampling, 44 patients had positive nodes, 40 (95%) of them had tumors >5 cm; 87 (64%) of patients with sampled nodes had fibrolamellar carcinoma (FLC), which was an independent risk factor for predicting positive nodes (P = 0.001). There was no difference in overall survival between patients who underwent LN sampling and those who did not; however, 5-y overall survival for node-positive patients was 40% versus 79% for node-negative patients (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In AYA patients with HCC, LN sampling was not associated with an independent survival benefit. However, FLC was an independent risk factor for LN positivity, suggesting a role for routine LN sampling in these patients.

Gender trends of military general surgery residency applicants.

BACKGROUND: Despite the fact that women comprise half of medical school graduates, women remain under-represented in General Surgery. We aimed to identify the trend in military general surgery applicants based on gender. METHODS: A retrospective review of the Medical Operational Data System (MODS) applicants from 2014 to 2019 was performed. Demographic data included age, gender, average board scores, applied and matched specialty. RESULTS: 204 students applied and 167 applicants matched into Army General Surgery programs from 2014 to 2019. The percentage of all students applying to General Surgery was statistically higher in females (13.4% vs 9.0%, p = 0.04), with females matching at a statistically higher rate (77% vs 57%, p = 0.02). Over the last 6 years, 55% of residents in training are men and 45% are women. CONCLUSION: Army General Surgery programs have increased the amount of women in training over the last six years. We believe that this will ultimately translate to more female surgeons contributing to military medicine.

Machine Learning for Military Trauma: Novel Massive Transfusion Predictive Models in Combat Zones.

BACKGROUND: Damage control resuscitation has become the standard of care in military and civilian trauma. Early identification of blood product requirements may aid in optimizing the clinical decision-making process while improving trauma related outcomes. This study aimed to assess and compare multiple machine learning models for predicting patients at highest risk for massive transfusion on the battlefield. METHODS: Supervised machine learning approaches using logistic regression, support vector machine, neural network, and random forest techniques were used to create predictive models for massive transfusion using standard prehospital and arrival data points from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry, 2008-2016. Seventy percent of the population was used for model development and performance was validated using the remaining 30%. Models were tested for accuracy and compared by standard performance statistics. RESULTS: A total of 22,158 patients (97% male, 58% penetrating injury, median age 25-29 y/o, average Injury Severity Score 9, with an overall mortality of 3%) were included in the analysis. Massive transfusion was required by 7.4% of patients. Overall accuracy was found to be above 90% in all models tested. Following cross validation and model training, the random forest model outperformed the alternatively tested models for precision, recall, and area under the curve. CONCLUSION: Machine learning techniques may allow for more optimal and rapid identification of combat trauma patients at highest risk for massive transfusion. These powerful approaches may uncover novel correlations and help improve triage, activation of massive transfusion resources, and trauma-related outcomes. Further research seeking to optimize and apply these algorithms to trauma-centered research should be pursued.

Gender Differences in Medical Specialty Decision Making: The Importance of Mentorship.

INTRODUCTION: While there have been many studies reviewing factors considered by medical students in deciding on a specialty, there is a relative paucity of data in how these factors differ between males and females. The aim of this study was to determine if there are differences in how male and female medical students' value various factors in choosing a career path in medicine. METHODS: A survey of basic demographic information and a Likert-based questionnaire addressing various factors in specialty choice was sent to all military medical students in the class of 2019. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 30%. Amongst the students that completed the survey, 72% were male and 28% were female. The majority of students were less than 27 years old (52%) and Caucasian (76%). Female medical students placed more importance in exposure to third year clerkships (P = 0.004) and gender diversity within the specialty (P = 0.03) than their male counterparts. There was no statistical difference in opinions of significant others or family members, desire to have a family, or having a well-balanced life between female, and male medical students. CONCLUSION: Female medical students valued exposure to third year clerkships and gender diversity more than their male colleagues when choosing a future specialty. These findings suggest that a strategic focus should be placed on mentoring female medical students in order to promote a diverse medical workforce.

30-day postoperative outcomes of neonatal versus delayed anoplasty for perineal and vestibular fistulas.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the postoperative outcomes of neonatal versus delayed repair of rectoperineal and rectovestibular fistulae using a multi-center pediatric colorectal specific database. We hypothesized that the incidence of 30-day postoperative complications is not significantly different between these two surgical treatment strategies. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, observational study of the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC) database. We included any patient from the database that underwent primary surgical repair of a rectoperineal or rectovestibular fistula. Neonatal repair was defined as occurring within 14 days of birth, and delayed repair as occurring after that period. The primary outcome was the occurrence of postoperative complications within 30 days. RESULTS: 164 patients were included in the study (123 rectoperineal, 41 rectovestibular); the majority (81%) were repaired in a delayed fashion. Patients that underwent delayed repair had lower birth weights and were more likely to be female than those that underwent neonatal repair. Wound breakdown/dehiscence was the most common complication in both groups (Delayed 5.3% v. Neonatal, 6.5%). We found no significant difference in the incidence of any postoperative complication between groups (Delayed 6.0 v. Neonatal 6.5%, p = 1.0). CONCLUSION: We concluded there was no significant difference in the incidence of 30-day postoperative complications for neonatal versus delayed repair of rectoperineal and rectovestibular fistulae, suggesting that both strategies are safe and may have excellent short-term outcomes in appropriately selected patients.

Venous thromboembolic risk stratification in pediatric trauma: A Pediatric Trauma Society Research Committee multicenter analysis.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in injured children is rare, but its consequences are significant. Several risk stratification algorithms for VTE in pediatric trauma exist with little consensus, and all are hindered in development by relying on registry data with known inaccuracies. We performed a multicenter review to evaluate trauma registry fidelity and confirm the effectiveness of one established algorithm across diverse centers. METHODS: Local trauma registries at 10 institutions were queried for all patients younger than 18 years admitted between 2009 and 2018. Additional chart review was performed on all "VTE" cases and random non-VTE controls to assess registry errors. Corrected data were then applied to our prediction algorithm using 10 real-time variables (Glasgow Coma Scale, age, sex, intensive care unit admission, transfusion, central line placement, lower extremity/pelvic fracture, major surgery) to calculate VTE risk scores. Contingency table classifiers and the area under a receiver operator characteristic curve were calculated. RESULTS: Registries identified 52,524 pediatric trauma patients with 99 episodes of VTE; however, chart review found that 13 cases were misclassified for a corrected total of 86 cases (0.16%). After correction, the algorithm still displayed strong performance in discriminating VTE-fated encounters (sensitivity, 69%; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.96). Furthermore, despite wide institutional variability in VTE rates (0.04-1.7%), the algorithm maintained a specificity of >91% and a negative predictive value of >99.7% across centers. Chart review also revealed that 54% (n = 45) of VTEs were directly associated with a central line, usually femoral (n = 34, p < 0.001 compared with upper extremity), and that prophylaxis rates were underreported in the registries by about 50%; still, only 19% of the VTE cases had been on prophylaxis before diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The VTE prediction algorithm performed well when applied retrospectively across 10 diverse pediatric centers using corrected registry data. These findings can advance initiatives for VTE screening/prophylaxis guidance following pediatric trauma and warrant prospective study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Clinical decision rule evaluated in a single population, level III.

Addition of neurological status to pediatric adjusted shock index to predict early mortality in trauma: A pediatric Trauma Quality Improvement Program analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric adjusted shock index (SIPA) has demonstrated the ability to prospectively identify children at the highest risk for early mortality. The addition of neurological status to shock index has shown promise as a reliable triage tool in adult trauma populations. This study sought to assess the utility of combining SIPA with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) for predicting early trauma-related outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective review of the 2017 Trauma Quality Improvement Program Database was performed for all severely injured patients younger than 18 years old. Pediatric adjusted shock index and reverse SIPA × GCS (rSIG) were calculated. Age-specific cutoff values were derived for reverse shock index multiplied by GCS (rSIG) and compared with their SIPA counterparts for early mortality assessment using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. RESULTS: A total of 10,389 pediatric patients with an average age of 11.4 years, 67% male, average Injury Severity Score of 24.1, and 4% sustaining a major penetrating injury were included in the analysis. The overall mortality was 9.3%. Furthermore, 32.1% of patients displayed an elevated SIPA score, while only 27.5% displayed a positive rSIG. On area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, rSIG was found to be superior to SIPA as a predictor for in hospital mortality with values of 0.854 versus 0.628, respectively. CONCLUSION: Reverse shock index multiplied by GCS more readily predicted in hospital mortality for pediatric trauma patients when compared with SIPA. These findings suggest that neurological status should be an important factor during initial patient assessment. Further study to assess the applicability of rSIG for expanded trauma-related outcomes in pediatric trauma is necessary. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, level IV.

Safety code blue! Assessing the use of blue surgical sterilization wrap for homemade respirator masks during the COVID-19 crisis.

The use of surgical sterilization wrap for respirator masks during the COVID-19 crisis has become a popularized personal protective equipment alternative option due to claims supporting its ability to meet N95 standards. This study sought to assess these claims using standardized filter testing. The tested material failed to meet N95 standards and suggests its use may place medical personnel at increased risk of harm when managing COVID-19 patients.

Utilization of mobile application improves perioperative education and patient satisfaction in general surgery patients.

INTRODUCTION: Clear and accurate communication is paramount in delivering high quality surgical care. Through the development of a mobile application, we provided patients with a source of education and instruction throughout the peri-operative period. METHODS: Patients >18 years old with a smart-phone undergoing elective general surgery procedures were eligible. Patients received perioperative educational materials and text message reminders of time-sensitive events via the application. A System Usability Scale and survey was administered. RESULTS: 100 patients were enrolled; 51% completed the survey. The average SUS score was 86, correlating with >90th percentile usability. 86% of patients felt that the application improved their surgical experience, 96% said the application provided essential reminders, and 90% felt that application clarified information. 84% of patients did not identify any inconsistency between the application and surgeon. CONCLUSION: Utilizing patient's smart phones to aid in perioperative education is feasible and improves patient satisfaction. This application has a high usability score, indicating ease of use.

Dynamic trend or static variable: Shock Index Pediatric-Adjusted (SIPA) in warzone trauma.

BACKGROUND: Civilian studies suggest that trending Shock-Index Pediatric Adjusted(SIPA) values can prove useful in the prediction of trauma outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between trends in SIPA and outcomes in pediatric warzone trauma. METHODS: Retrospective review of the Department of Defense Trauma Registry from 2008 to 2015, including all patients age ≤17years. SIPA was calculated both pre-hospital and upon arrival, then classified as "normal" or "abnormal" based upon previously validated thresholds. Patients were stratified into groups based on the trend of their SIPA (1-normal to normal, 2-normal to abnormal, 3-abnormal to normal, 4-abnormal to abnormal). Key outcomes including ICU admission, severe injury, mechanical ventilation, and mortality were then compared between groups. RESULTS: 669 patients were included, mean ISS 12 ± 10. The most common mechanism of injury was blast (46.5%). Overall, 43% were stratified into Group 1, 13.9% into Group 2, 14.8% into Group 3, and 28.0% into Group 4. Those patients with a persistently abnormal SIPA (Group 4) had significantly increased incidence of severe injury, ICU admission, need for mechanical ventilation, and mortality. CONCLUSION: Trends in SIPA may be used to predict trauma outcomes for children injured in warzones, with persistently abnormal values associated with worse outcomes overall.

Pediatric adjusted reverse shock index multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale as a prospective predictor for mortality in pediatric trauma.

INTRODUCTION: Shock index and its pediatric adjusted derivative (pediatric age-adjusted shock index [SIPA]) have demonstrated utility as prospective predictors of mortality in adult and pediatric trauma populations. Although basic vital signs provide promise as triage tools, factors such as neurologic status on arrival have profound implications for trauma-related outcomes. Recently, the reverse shock index multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (rSIG) has been validated in adult trauma as a tool combining early markers of physiology and neurologic function to predict mortality. This study sought to compare the performance characteristics of rSIG against SIPA as a prospective predictor of mortality in pediatric war zone injuries. METHODS: Retrospective review of the Department of Defense Trauma Registry, 2008 to 2016, was performed for all patients younger than 18 years with documented vital signs and GCS on initial arrival to the trauma bay. Optimal age-specific cutoff values were derived for rSIG via the Youden index using receiver operating characteristic analyses. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to validate accuracy in predicting early mortality. RESULTS: A total of 2,007 pediatric patients with a median age range of 7 to 12 years, 79% male, average Injury Severity Score of 11.9, and 62.5% sustaining a penetrating injury were included in the analysis. The overall mortality was 7.1%. A total of 874 (43.5%) and 685 patients (34.1%) had elevated SIPA and pediatric rSIG scores, respectively. After adjusting for demographics, mechanism of injury, initial vital signs, and presenting laboratory values, rSIG (odds ratio, 4.054; p = 0.01) was found to be superior to SIPA (odds ratio, 2.742; p < 0.01) as an independent predictor of early mortality. CONCLUSION: Reverse shock index multiplied by GCS score more accurately identifies pediatric patients at highest risk of death when compared with SIPA alone, following war zone injuries. These findings may help further refine early risk assessments for patient management and resource allocation in constrained settings. Further validation is necessary to determine applicability to the civilian population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, level IV.

Focused Changes in Opioid Prescribing Yield Far-reaching Benefits Through Culture Change and Attention to Opioid Minimization.

OBJECTIVE: Standardization of prescriptions after specific procedures (laparoscopic appendectomy, cholecystectomy, inguinal/umbilical hernia repair) significantly reduces opioid prescriptions for these targeted procedures. We sought to determine the impact of increased attention to responsible opioid prescribing in the absence of protocolization. DESIGN: Prescription practices of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomies and Roux-en-y Gastric Bypasses at a tertiary medical center (October 1, 2016-September 30, 2018) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped into whether surgical intervention took place before or after institution of an unrelated opioid protocol in November 2017. Patients with chronic opioid use or extended hospital stay (>4 days) were excluded. Discharge prescriptions, oral morphine equivalents (OME), and need for repeat prescriptions were compared. SETTING: This study was set at Madigan Army Medical Center in Tacoma, Washington. PARTICIPANTS: All general surgery residents engaged in clinical duties at our institution during the dates of the study were included. RESULTS: Study population included 187 patients, with 91 patients undergoing surgery prior to the protocol and 88 post-protocol. Preprotocol patients were provided an average of 413 OME (SD 103) and 5.5% required repeat opioid prescriptions within 3 months of surgery. The most common opioid prescription was 300 mL of oxycodone elixir (450 OME, 88%). Postprotocol, opioid prescriptions fell 61% to an average of 161 OME (SD 71, p < 0.001). Repeat opioid requirements remained statistically unchanged (8.0%, p = 0.562). The most common opioid prescription postprotocol included 20 oxycodone tablets (150 OME, 76%). CONCLUSIONS: Opioid reduction efforts reap benefits beyond those procedures specifically targeted. Focus on responsible opioid prescribing through standardization, even when limited to certain procedures, may result in a hospital culture change with global opioid prescription reduction.

Shock Index as a Predictor of Massive Transfusion and Emergency Surgery on the Modern Battlefield.

BACKGROUND: Shock Index (SI) has been used to predict the need for massive transfusion (MT) and emergency surgical procedures (ESP) in civilian trauma. We hypothesize that SI can reliably identify combat trauma patients that will require MT and ESP when applied to the resource-constrained, combat environment. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed within the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (2008-2016). SI was calculated using heart rate and systolic blood pressure on arrival to the initial facility with surgical capabilities. A threshold value of 0.8 was used to stratify patients into two groups (Group I, SI < 0.8; and Group II, SI ≥ 0.8). The need for MT, ESP, and mortality was compared. Regression analyses were conducted to determine the independent association of SI with MT and ESP. RESULTS: A total of 4008 patients were included. The mean age of the patients was 25.5 y, and the majority were predominately male (98%). Mechanisms of injury were blunt and blast injury (62%), penetrating injury (36.7%), and burn injury (0.5%). Overall, 77% of patients (n = 3070) were stratified to Group I, and 23% of patients (n = 938) were stratified to Group II, by SI. Group II patients had a significantly greater need for MT (8.4% versus 0.4%) and ESP (30.7% versus 6.5%), both P < 0.001. Regression analysis controlling for age, gender, Injury Severity Score, and Glasgow Coma Score confirmed that SI ≥ 0.8 was an independent risk factor for both MT and need for ESPs (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SI is a significant predictor of the need for MT and ESPs in the military trauma population, representing a simple and potentially potent tool for triage and prediction of resource consumption in the resource-limited, austere setting.

Early outcomes following trauma related to sex: A matched analysis of military service members in the department of defense trauma registry.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have identified sex as a factor influencing early outcomes after trauma. With the increased representation of women in combat roles, there is a need for improved understanding of the pathophysiology of traumatic injury in women. The purpose of this study was to define sex-based differences in early combat trauma outcomes amongst military service members. METHODS: A retrospective review of the Department of Defense Trauma Registry between 2008 and 2016 was performed. A 2:1 case control match was performed to match for Injury Severity Score, mechanism of injury, and age. The primary outcome of the study was mortality. RESULTS: A total of 4,625 patients were included in the study, 2.2% of whom were women. Women were less significantly injured than men (Injury Severity Score, 7.7 vs. 11, p = 0.003) and more likely to sustain blunt trauma (81% vs. 62.5%, p = 0.01). After case-control matching, 202 men and 101 women were evaluated. There was no statistical difference in the primary outcome of mortality. There was no statistical difference in Glasgow Coma Scale score, crystalloid or colloid administration, Packed Red Blood Cells (PRBC), platelet, cryoprecipitate, or plasma usage between men and women. CONCLUSION: Contrary to the civilian trauma literature, our study demonstrated no significant difference in early mortality between male and female combat casualties in a matched cohort. This finding may represent a difference in injury patterns, resuscitation practices, or lifesaving interventions in a deployed setting as compared with civilian setting. As the proportion of women involved in combat operations continues to increase, prospective studies should be performed to better define injury patterns, as well as early and late outcomes related to military trauma in the female population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective, Level IV.

Postoperative outcomes of Bascom cleft lift for pilonidal disease: A single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Limited data exists regarding outcomes for the Bascom cleft lift procedure for pilonidal disease. METHODS: Single-center retrospective review of patients who underwent a Bascom cleft lift from 2013 to 2018. Univariate analysis was performed to determine associations between patient-specific characteristics and post-operative complications. Postoperative complications were categorized as major or minor. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of postoperative complications. RESULTS: 235 patients were included. Forty-five percent were obese and 24% were active smokers. Minor complications occurred in 34.5% (81); major complications occurred in 19.1% (45). The recurrence rate was 4.7% (11). Smoking was not associated with postoperative complications. Obesity was independently associated with higher rates of both minor (OR 2.6, p = 0.001) and major (OR 2.3, p = 0.001) complications. DISCUSSION: Wound complications are common after Bascom cleft lift. Obesity is an independent predictor of postoperative complications. Obese patients should be appropriately counseled regarding their increased risk prior to surgery.

All trauma is not created equal: Redefining severe trauma for combat injuries.

Injury severity scores (ISS) and shock index (SI) are popular trauma scoring systems. We assessed ISS and SI in combat trauma to determine the optimal cut-off values for mortality and trauma outcomes. Retrospective analysis of the Department of Defense Trauma Registry, 2008-2016, was performed. Areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) were calculated for ISS and SI on mortality, massive volume transfusion (MVT), and emergent surgical procedure (ESP). Optimal cut-off values were defined using the Youden index (YI). 22,218 patients (97.1% male), median ages 25-29 years, ISS 9.4 ± 0.07, with 58.1% penetrating injury were studied. Overall mortality was 3.4%. AUROCs for ISS on mortality, MVT, and ESP were 0.882, 0.898, and 0.846, while AUROCs for SI were 0.727, 0.864, and 0.711 respectively. The optimal cut-off values for ISS on mortality, MVT, and ESP were 12.5 (YI = 0.634), 12.5 (YI = 0.666), and 12.5 (YI = 0.819), with optimal values for SI being 0.94 (YI = 0.402), 0.88 (YI = 0.608), and 0.81 (YI = 0.345) respectively. Classic values for severe ISS underrepresent combat injury while the SI values defined in this study are consistent with civilian data.

Viscoelastic testing in combat resuscitation: Is it time for a new standard?

BACKGROUND: Traumatic hemorrhage and coagulopathy represent major sources of morbidity and mortality on the modern battlefield. Viscoelastic testing (VET) offers a potentially more personalized approach to resuscitation. We sought to evaluate outcomes of combat trauma patients who received VET-guided resuscitation compared with standard balanced blood product resuscitation. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the Department of Defense Trauma Registry, 2008 to 2016 was performed. Multivariate logistic regression analyses of all adult patients initially presenting to NATO Role III facilities who required blood products were performed to identify factors associated with VET-guided resuscitation and mortality. A propensity score matched comparison of outcomes in patient cohorts treated at VET versus non-VET Role III facilities was performed. RESULTS: There are 3,320 patients, predominately male (98%), median age ranges from 25 years to 29 years, Injury Severity Score of 18.8, with a penetrating injury (84%) were studied. Overall mortality was 9.7%. Five hundred ninety-four patients had VET during their initial resuscitation. After adjusting for confounders, VET during initial resuscitation was independently associated with decreased mortality (odds ratio, 0.63; p = 0.04). Propensity analysis confirmed this survival advantage with a 57% reduction in overall mortality (7.3% vs. 13.1%; p = 0.001) for all patients requiring blood products. CONCLUSION: Viscoelastic testing offers the possibility of a product-specific resuscitation for critically injured patients requiring transfusion in combat settings. Routine VET may be superior to non-VET-guided resuscitation for combat trauma victims. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.

Validation of Shock Index Pediatric-Adjusted for children injured in warzones.

BACKGROUND: Shock Index Pediatric-Adjusted (SIPA) has been used to predict injury severity and outcomes after civilian pediatric trauma. We hypothesize that SIPA can predict the need for blood transfusion and emergent surgery among pediatric patients injured in warzones, where resources are limited and accurate triage is essential. METHODS: Retrospective review of the DoD Trauma Registry for all patients 17 years or younger, from 2008 to 2015. Shock Index Pediatric-Adjusted was determined using vital signs recorded upon arrival to the initial level of care. Patients were classified into two groups (normal vs. elevated SIPA) using age-specific threshold values. The need for blood product transfusion (BPT) within 24 hours and emergent surgical procedures (ESP) was compared between groups. Intensive care unit admission, injury severity, and mortality were also compared. Regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between SIPA and primary outcomes. RESULTS: There were 2,121 patients included with a mean Injury Severity Score of 12 ± 10. The mechanism of injury was penetrating (63%), blunt (25%), and burns (12%). Patients with an elevated SIPA (43%) had a significantly greater need for BPT (49.2% vs. 25.0%) and ESP (22.9% vs. 16.0%), as well as mortality (10.3% vs. 4.8%) and intensive care unit admission (49.9% vs. 36.1%), all p less than 0.001. Regression analysis confirmed an elevated SIPA as independently associated with both BPT (odds ratio, 2.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-2.94; p < 0.001) and ESP (odds ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.64; p = 0.044). CONCLUSION: This is the first study of SIPA in pediatric warzone trauma. Elevated SIPA is associated with significantly increased need for BPT and emergent surgery and may therefore serve as a valuable tool for planning and triage in austere settings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/epidemiological, Level III.