Patients undergoing surgical treatment for low-energy distal radius fractures are more likely to receive a referral and participate in a fracture liaison service program.

INTRODUCTION: Patients often do not receive osteoporosis screening after a low-energy distal radius fracture (DRF). The effect of osteoporosis on the healing of DRFs remains a debate, and it is unclear if surgical treatment of this injury affects the referral and participation rates in a fracture liaison service (FLS) program. The purpose of this study is to report on a large cohort of low-energy DRFs and identify demographic, clinical, and treatment factors that affect referral and participation rates in an FLS program. METHODS: A retrospective review identified patients over 50 years old who sustained a low-energy DRF between 2013 and 2018. Patients with high-energy or unknown injury mechanisms were excluded. The primary outcome was the effect of DRF surgical treatment on referral and participation rates in an FLS program. Secondary outcomes included patient demographic and clinical characteristic effects on referral and participation rates in an FLS program. RESULTS: In total, 950 patients met inclusion criteria. Two hundred thirty patients (24.2%) were referred and 149 (15.7%) participated in the FLS program. Patients who underwent surgery were more likely to be referred to the FLS (OR 1.893, CI 1.403-2.555, p < 0.001) and participate in the FLS program (OR 2.47, CI 1.723-3.542, p < 0.001) compared to patients who received non-operative treatment of their DRF. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo surgical treatment of a low-energy DRF are more likely to be referred and participate in a FLS program. Further study is needed to identify why surgical treatment may affect referral and participation rates.

Contributions of Pubic Rami Fracture Morphology and Fixation to Pelvic Ring Stability in Type 1 Lateral Compression Injuries: A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of lateral compression type 1 (LC-1) injuries has historically been nonoperative with immediate weight-bearing. However, management of these injuries remains controversial, with reports of displacement at follow-up for nonoperatively managed LC-1 fractures. The goal of our study was to determine the effect of superior pubic ramus fracture morphology and fixation construct on pelvic stability. METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric were transected into hemi-pelvises. Incomplete Denis type 1 sacral fractures were made. Hemi-pelvises were randomized to receive a transverse-type or oblique-type superior pubic ramus fracture with the contralateral hemi-pelvis receiving the opposing morphology. A lateral load to 135N was applied with an Instron materials testing machine and lateral displacement of the hemi-pelvis was recorded. Deflection and stiffness were calculated. Statistical analysis was conducted using a t test assuming unequal variances with an alpha = 0.05. RESULTS: Oblique-type superior pubic ramus fractures allowed more deflection compared with transverse-type fractures in the absence of fixation (P = 0.018). The posterior-only and combined anterior and posterior fixation configurations on average reduced deflection more than no fixation or anterior fixation only. In all fixation configuration cases, the average deflection for transverse-type fractures was less than that of the oblique-type fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that displacement of LC-1 pelvic injuries may be related to pubic rami fracture morphology. When looking at initial injury imaging, oblique-type pubic rami fractures may suggest an increased potential for displacement over time. In such cases, we recommend an examination under anesthesia to evaluate for underlying instability and consideration for fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level V.

Advances in Geriatric Hip Fractures: Pre-Operative Considerations and Tips to Optimize Outcome.

SUMMARY: Geriatric hip fractures are complicated by increased morbidity and mortality, and their incidence continues to rise around the world. Frequent considerations in treating geriatric hip fractures include optimal time to surgery, need for preoperative cardiac clearance, risks of operating through anticoagulation, utilization of regional anesthesia, and collaborative care between treatment teams. This article aims to summarize these factors as well as to provide some tips and tricks that can be helpful in their surgical management.