The effects of early or direct admission to a specialised spinal injury unit on outcomes after acute traumatic spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: For acute traumatic spinal cord injury (ATSCI), this study aimed to determine differences in outcomes between patient groups stratified by admission time (⩽24 vs >24 h) to the Spinal Injury Unit (SIU) and by the nature of the admission (direct admission to the SIU vs indirect admission via another hospital). We also aimed to measure the effect on time to admission of a 'non-refusal' policy that triggered immediate acceptance of ATSCI cases to the SIU. SETTING: New South Wales, Australia. METHODS: Study population was all adult SCI patients admitted to the Prince of Wales SIU from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2012. Patients admitted with chronic-stage SCI or with incomplete data for the duration of their stay were excluded. Comparison of outcomes was made between groups according to the setting of admission. Time to admission before and after initiation (2009) of the 'non-refusal' policy was compared. The prevalence of complications, lengths of stay (LOSs) and time to admission were compared by Mann-Whitney non-parametric methods. Count modelling was used to control for confounders of age and gender. RESULTS: A total of 460 cases were identified and 76 were excluded. The early group had fewer pressure areas (41.8% vs 63.2%; P<0.001) and shorter LOS (136 vs 172 days; P<0.001) than the late group. The direct group had fewer pressure areas (35.2% vs 54.9%, P<0.001), deep vein thrombosis (9.9% vs 24.6%, P=0.003) and shorter LOS (124 vs 158 days, P=0.007) than those admitted indirectly. Time to admission was reduced after introduction of the 'non-refusal' policy (1.53 vs 0.63 days; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Early and direct admission to SIU reduced complication rates and LOS. A non-refusal policy reduced time to admission.

The pre-hospital epidemiology and management of spinal cord injuries in New South Wales: 2004-2008.

CONTEXT: Patients who have sustained a traumatic spinal cord injury require appropriate management in the immediate post-injury period for both survival and to reduce the chances of costly and disabling permanent neurological deficits. Emerging time-critical neuroprotective therapies require the prompt recognition and transfer of patients to a specialised centre for early intervention. METHODS: The Ambulance Research Institute, with the New South Wales State Spinal Cord Injury Service retrospectively linked prehospital data to spinal cord injury unit (SCIU) outcome data for all 324 patients transported by ambulance and subsequently admitted to a SCIU with a persisting traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) between January 2004 and June 2008, with the aim of identifying factors that impact on the provision of timely and appropriate care. RESULTS: Paramedics appropriately managed 88% of SCI patients. Only 4.9% of patients had initial vital signs potentially indicative of neurological injury. The median time to a SCIU was 12h, with 60% of patients undergoing multiple transfers. The odds of reaching a SCIU in over 24h were 1.71 times greater for patients injured in a major city (95% CI 1.00-2.90) in comparison to other areas of NSW. More SCI patients with multiple trauma experienced delays in reaching a SCIU (59%), compared to patients with isolated SCI (40%; p=0.039). Patients initially transported to a designated major trauma centre were more likely to be delayed in reaching a SCIU, regardless of whether their injury was an isolated SCI or associated with multiple trauma, compared with other patients. Patients who took greater than 24h to reach a SCIU were 2.5 times more likely to develop a secondary complication (95% CI 1.51-4.17, p=0.0004). Patients who sustained their SCI as a result of a low fall were older and less likely to have their SCI identified and treated early, with less than half of this group reaching a SCIU within 24h compared with other SCI patients (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.19-0.93, p=0.004). CONCLUSION: Early recognition, appropriate prehospital management, triage, timely and appropriate interfacility transfers of all SCI patients are critical for access to specialised care and reducing preventable complications. Elderly fallers present particular challenges to early identification.

The SF-36 walk-wheel: a simple modification of the SF-36 physical domain improves its responsiveness for measuring health status change in spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity and responsiveness of a modified SF-36 within a spinal cord-injured (SCI) population. STUDY DESIGN: SF-36 scores collected at baseline and on completion of a randomized controlled trial in 305 patients with SCI and neuropathic bladder. SETTING: New South Wales, Australia. METHODS: Subjects were administered the standard SF-36 plus three additional questions, in which 'walk' was replaced with 'wheel' for three of the physical function (PF) questions. Discriminant validity was determined by comparing participants with paraplegia and tetraplegia using the effect size (ES). Responsiveness was assessed in the subset of patients who developed a urinary tract infection (UTI) during the trial using the standardized response mean (SRM). RESULTS: Compared with the standard SF-36, the SF-36 walk-wheel modification (SF-36ww) increased the mean PF score from 18 to 39 (P<0.001) and the physical composite score from 33 to 37 (P<0.001). Discriminant validity was similar for both versions (PF paraplegia/tetraplegia: ES 1.09(SF-36) vs 1.08(SF-36ww), n=305). Among 138 SCI patients who developed a UTI, the SF-36ww almost doubled PF responsiveness for all neurological levels (SRM increased from 0.36 to 0.68), more so in tetraplegic (SRM, 0.11 vs 0.58; n=77) than paraplegic groups (SRM, 0.77 vs 0.86; n=61). CONCLUSION: The SF-36ww is a simple, pragmatic modification of the SF-36 PF items, which addresses some problems of content validity and floor effect for SCI subjects and greatly improves responsiveness, particularly for those with tetraplegia. Because it comprises a simple addition to the standard SF-36, external comparisons are preserved.

Spinal-injured neuropathic bladder antisepsis (SINBA) trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether Methenamine Hippurate (MH) or cranberry tablets prevent urinary tract infections (UTI) in people with neuropathic bladder following spinal cord injury (SCI). STUDY DESIGN: Double-blind factorial-design randomized controlled trial (RCT) with 2 year recruitment period from November 2000 and 6 month follow-up. SETTING: In total, 543 eligible predominantly community dwelling patients were invited to participate in the study, of whom 305 (56%) agreed. METHODS: Eligible participants were people with SCI with neurogenic bladder and stable bladder management. All regimens were indistinguishable in appearance and taste. The dose of MH used was 1 g twice-daily. The dose of cranberry used was 800 mg twice-daily. The main outcome measure was the time to occurrence of a symptomatic UTI. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed that patients randomized to MH did not have a significantly longer UTI-free period compared to placebo (HR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.68-1.35, P=0.75). Patients randomized to cranberry likewise did not have significantly longer UTI-free period compared to placebo (HR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.67-1.31, P=0.70). CONCLUSION: There is no benefit in the prevention of UTI from the addition of MH or cranberry tablets to the usual regimen of patients with neuropathic bladder following SCI.