RESUMO
BackgroundThe benefit of vaccination in people who experienced a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection remains unclear. ObjectiveTo estimate the effectiveness of primary (two-dose) and booster (third dose) vaccination against Omicron infection among people with a prior documented infection. DesignTest-negative case-control study. SettingYale New Haven Health System facilities. ParticipantsVaccine eligible people who received SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing between November 1, 2021, and January 31, 2022. MeasurementsWe conducted two analyses, each with an outcome of Omicron BA.1 infection (S-gene target failure defined) and each stratified by prior SARS-CoV-2 infection status. We estimated the effectiveness of primary and booster vaccination. To test whether booster vaccination reduced the risk of infection beyond that of the primary series, we compared the odds among boosted and booster eligible people. ResultsOverall, 10,676 cases and 119,397 controls were included (6.1% and 7.8% occurred following a prior infection, respectively). The effectiveness of primary vaccination 14-149 days after 2nd dose was 36.1% (CI, 7.1% to 56.1%) for people with and 28.5% (CI, 20.0% to 36.2%) without prior infection. The odds ratio comparing boosted and booster eligible people with prior infection was 0.83 (CI, 0.56 to 1.23), whereas the odds ratio comparing boosted and booster eligible people without prior infection was 0.51 (CI, 0.46 to 0.56). LimitationsMisclassification, residual confounding, reliance on TaqPath assay analyzed samples. ConclusionWhile primary vaccination provided protection against BA.1 infection among people with and without prior infection, booster vaccination was only associated with additional protection in people without prior infection. These findings support primary vaccination in people regardless of prior infection status but suggest that infection history should be considered when evaluating the need for booster vaccination. Primary Funding SourceBeatrice Kleinberg Neuwirth and Sendas Family Funds, Merck and Co through their Merck Investigator Studies Program, and the Yale Schools of Public Health and Medicine.
RESUMO
BackgroundThe structural environment of urban slums, including physical, demographic and socioeconomic attributes, renders inhabitants more vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Yet, little is known about the specific determinants that contribute to high transmission within these communities. Methods and findingsWe performed a serosurvey of an established cohort of 2,035 urban slum residents from the city of Salvador, Brazil between November 2020 and February 2021, following the first COVID-19 pandemic wave in the country. We identified high SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence (46.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 44.3-48.6%), particularly among female residents (48.7% [95% CI 45.9-51.6%] vs. 43.2% [95% CI 39.8-46.6%] among male residents), and among children (56.5% [95% CI 52.3-60.5%] vs. 42.4% [95% CI 39.9-45.0%] among adults). In multivariable models that accounted for household-level clustering, the odds ratio for SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity among children was 1.96 (95% CI 1.42-2.72) compared to adults aged 30-44 years. Adults residing in households with children were more likely to be seropositive; this effect was particularly prominent among individuals with age 30-44 and 60 years or more. Women living below the poverty threshold (daily per capita household income <$1.25) and those who were unemployed were more likely to be seropositive. ConclusionsDuring a single wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, cumulative incidence as assessed by serology approached 50% in a Brazilian urban slum population. In contrast to observations from industrialized countries, SARS-CoV-2 incidence was highest among children, as well as women living in extreme poverty. These findings emphasize the need for targeted interventions that provide safe environments for children and mitigate the structural risks posed by crowding and poverty for the most vulnerable residents of urban slum communities.
RESUMO
BackgroundAs the COVID-19 pandemic evolves, there is a need for reliable and scalable seroepidemiology methods to estimate incidence, monitor the dynamics of population-level immunity, and guide mitigation and immunization policies. Our aim was to evaluate the reliability of normalized ELISA optical density (nOD) at a single dilution as a predictor of SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin titers derived from serial dilutions. MethodsWe conducted serial serological surveys of a community-based cohort from the city of Salvador, Brazil after two sequential COVID-19 epidemic waves. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein immunoglobulin G (anti-S IgG) ELISA (Euroimmun AG) was performed with serial 3-fold dilutions of sera from 54 of the 1101 cohort participants. We estimated interpolated ELISA titers, used parametric models to fit the relationship between nOD at a single 1:100 dilution and interpolated titers, and assessed the correlation between changes in nOD and changes in titers. ResultsThe relationship between nOD at a single 1:100 dilution and interpolated titers fit a log-log curve, with a residual standard error of 0.304. We derived a conversion table of nOD to interpolated titer values. Additionally, there was a high correlation between changes in nOD and changes in interpolated titers between paired serial samples (r = 0.836, {rho} = 0.873). Changes in nOD reliably predicted increases and decreases in titers, with 98.1% agreement ({kappa} = 95.9%). ConclusionSingle nOD measurements can reliably estimate SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers, significantly reducing time, labor, and resource needs when conducting large-scale serological surveys to ascertain population-level changes in exposure and immunity. HighlightsO_LIOptical density at a single dilution reliably estimates SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers C_LIO_LISerial optical density measurements accurately identify changes in serostatus C_LIO_LIUsing single optical density values can significantly reduce resource use in serosurveys C_LI
