Isolation, Solubility, and Characterization of D-Mannitol Esters of 4-Methoxybenzeneboronic Acid.

The purpose of this study was to determine the aqueous solubility of a model phenyl boronic acid, 4-methoxybenzeneboronic acid, as a function of pH both in the absence and in the presence of varying D-mannitol concentration. Solid isolated D-mannitol esters were characterized by differential scanning calorimetry, thermogravimetric analysis, powder X-ray diffraction, and single-crystal X-ray studies, and the boronic acid-to-D-mannitol ratio was quantified by HPLC. Hydrolysis of the monoester was studied using UV spectral differences between the monoester and the parent boronic acid. Two D-mannitol esters of 4-methoxybenzeneboronic acid were isolated. The triboronate ester was very insoluble whereas a symmetrical monoboronate monohydrate was also less soluble than the parent. Both esters were crystalline. The monoboronate monohydrate was, however, more soluble than the parent at alkaline pH values due to its lower pKa value (6.53) compared to the parent acid (9.41). Hydrolysis of the monoboronate was extremely fast when even small amount of water was added to dry acetonitrile solutions of the ester. The hydrolysis was buffer concentration dependent and apparent pH sensitive with hydrolysis accelerated by acid. Implications affecting the formulation of future boronic acid drugs are discussed.

Interaction of model aryl- and alkyl-boronic acids and 1,2-diols in aqueous solution.

The goal of this work was to quantitate ester formation between alkyl and aryl boronic acids and vicinal-diols or 1,2-diols in aqueous solution. As used here, 1,2-diols includes polyols with one or more 1,2-diol pairs. Multiple techniques were used including apparent pKa shifts of the boronic acids using UV spectrophotometry (for aryl acids) and titration (for aryl and alkyl acids). Isothermal microcalorimetry was also used, with all reactions being enthalpically favored. For all the acids and 1,2-diols and the conditions studied, evidence only supported 1:1 ester formation. All the esters formed were found to be significantly more acidic, as Lewis acids, by 3-3.5 pKa units than the corresponding nonesterified boronic acid. The equilibrium constants for ester formation increased with increasing number of 1,2-diol pairs but stereochemistry may also play a role as sorbitol with five possible 1,2-diol pairs and five isomers (taking into account the stereochemistry of the alcohol groups) was twice as efficient at ester formation compared with mannitol, also with five possible 1,2-diol pairs but only three isomers. Alkyl boronic acids formed esters to a greater extent than aryl acids. Although some quantitative differences were seen between the various techniques used, rank ordering of the structure/reactivity was consistent. Formulation implications of ester formation between boronic acids and 1,2-diols are discussed.

Properties of a model aryl boronic acid and its boroxine.

Many boronic acid-containing molecules are currently under investigation as possible therapeutics. An increase in the knowledge of the physical and chemical properties of these compounds will lead to their improved formulation into usable dosage forms. The current study describes the formation and characterization of a boronic acid anhydride, called a boroxine. The model boronic acid, 4-methoxybenzeneboronic acid is used. The current study demonstrates the utility of thermal (differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis) and spectral (solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance and ultraviolet spectroscopy) methods to quantitate and characterize the boronic acid and its boroxine, validated against definitive structures solved by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The present work also demonstrates that the hydrolysis of the boroxine in the presence of water is very rapid in a time scale relative to drug substance manufacture and product formulation.

Delineating the contribution of secretory transporters in the efflux of etoposide using Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells overexpressing P-glycoprotein (Pgp), multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP1), and canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter (cMOAT).

Multidrug resistance conferred to cancer cells is often mediated by the expression of efflux transporter "pumps". It is also believed that many of the same transporters are involved in drug efflux from numerous normal endothelial and epithelial cell types in the intestine, brain, kidney, and liver. Etoposide transport kinetics were characterized in Caco-2 cells and in well established Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCKII) cell lines that were stably-transfected with a human cDNA encoding P-glycoprotein (Pgp), human multidrug resistance protein (MRP1), or the canalicular multispecific organic anion (cMOAT) transporters to determine the roles of these transporters in etoposide efflux. Etoposide transport kinetics were concentration-dependent in the MDCKII-MDR1 and MDCKII-cMOAT cells. The apparent secretory Michaelis constant (Km) and carrier-mediated permeability (Pc) values for Pgp and cMOAT were 254.96 +/- 94.39 microM and 5.96 +/- 0.41 x 10(-6) cm/s and 616.54 +/- 163.15 microM and 1.87 +/- 0.10 x 10(-5) cm/s, respectively. The secretory permeability of etoposide decreased significantly in the basal to apical (B to A) (i.e., efflux) direction, whereas the permeability increased 2.3-fold in the apical to basal (A to B) direction in MDCKII-MDR1 cells in the presence of elacridar (GF120918). Moderate inhibition of etoposide efflux by leukotriene C4 (LTC4) was observed in MDCKII-cMOAT cells. Furthermore, etoposide inhibited LTC4 efflux, confirming the involvement of cMOAT. The flux of etoposide in MDCKII-MRP1 cells was similar to that in MDCKII/wt control cells. The current results demonstrate that the secretory transport mechanism of etoposide involves multiple transporters, including Pgp and cMOAT but not MRP1. These results demonstrate that Pgp and cMOAT are involved in the intestinal secretory transport of etoposide. Since the intestinal secretion of etoposide was previously reported in the literature, it also suggests that they may be involved in the in vivo intestinal secretion of etoposide; however, mechanistic in vivo studies are required to confirm this.